A game-theoretic systematic of interactions and dynamics in the conservation and management of spatial ecosystem services

Drechsler, Martin (2023): A game-theoretic systematic of interactions and dynamics in the conservation and management of spatial ecosystem services.

Abstract

Since many ecosystem services involve spatial scales beyond farm size, their preservation and management in agricultural systems depends on the interaction of the landowners. For the analysis of such interactive land use a dynamic generic land-use model is developed that considers different payoff structures in a systematic manner and relates land-use dynamics to payoff structure in a generic manner. A landowner’s own payoff depends on the land use on neighbouring land parcels. The landowners’ payoffs are interpreted in a game-theoretic manner which allows for a game-theoretic classification of the different land-use dynamics generated by the model. The model is analysed to determine the proportion, spatial aggregation and temporal turnover of land-use measures. The model results are applied to a number of cases from the literature in which the management of ecosystem services involves a regional scale, including pollinator conservation, pest control, and coordination incentives for the conservation of species in fragmented landscapes. Four main domains of model behaviour are identified, characterised by the proportions and temporal turnover of land-use measures, and whether the system has one or two stable equilibria. The borders between different domains are characterised by high behaviour-induced spatial aggregation of land-use measures.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: ecosystem services, land use, simulation model, spatial externality
• Subjects: C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C6 - Mathematical Methods ; Programming Models ; Mathematical and Simulation Modeling > C63 - Computational Techniques ; Simulation Modeling; C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C6 - Mathematical Methods ; Programming Models ; Mathematical and Simulation Modeling > C65 - Miscellaneous Mathematical Tools; Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q2 - Renewable Resources and Conservation > Q20 - General; Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q5 - Environmental Economics > Q57 - Ecological Economics: Ecosystem Services ; Biodiversity Conservation ; Bioeconomics ; Industrial Ecology

References

Bamière, L., David, M., Vermont, B., 2013. Agri-environmental policies for biodiversity when the spatial pattern of the reserve matters. Ecological Economics 85, 97–104.

Bareille, F., Zavalloni, M., Raggi, M., Viaggi, D., 2021. Cooperative management of ecosystem services: coalition formation, landscape structure and policies. Environmental and Resource Economics 79, 232–356.

Bareille, F., Zavalloni, M., Viaggi, D., 2023. Agglomeration bonus and endogenous group formation. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 105, 76 – 98.

Bell, A., Zhang, W., 2016. Payments discourage coordination in ecosystem services provision: evidence from behavioral experiments in Southeast Asia. Environmental Research Letters 11, 114024.

Brauchli, K., Killingback, T., Doebeli, M., 1999. Evolution of cooperation in spatially structured populations. Journal of Theoretical Biology 200, 405-417.

Colyvan. M., Justus, J., Regan, H.M., 2011. The conservation game. Biological Conservation 144 1246–1253.

Cong, R.G., Smith, H.G., Olsson, O., Brady, M., 2014. Managing ecosystem services for agriculture: Will landscape-scale management pay? Ecological Economics 99., 53–62.

Drechsler, M., 2023. Improving models of coordination incentives for biodiversity conservation by fitting a multi-agent simulation model to a lab experiment. Journal of Behavioural and Experimental Economics 102, art. 101967.

Drechsler., M., in in review. Insights from Ising models of land-use under economic coordination incentives.

Grogan, K.A., Goodhue, R.E., 2012. Spatial externalities of pest control decisions in the California citrus Industry. Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics 37, 156–179.

Hanski, I. (1999). Metapopulation Ecology. Oxford University Press.

Kremen, C., Williams, N.M., Aizen, M.A., Gemmill-Herren, B., LeBuhn, G., Minckley, R., Packer, L., Potts, S.G., Roulston, T., Steffan-Dewenter, I., Va´ zquez, D.P., Winfree, R., Adams, L., Crone, E.E., Greenleaf, S.S., Keitt, T.H., Klein, A.-M., Regetz, J., Ricketts, T.H., 2007. Pollination and other ecosystem services produced by mobile organisms: a conceptual framework for the effects of land-use change. Ecology Letters 10, 299–314.

Koella, J.C., 2000. The spatial spread of altruism versus the evolutionary response of egoists. Proceedings of the Royal Society B 267, 1979-1985.

Larhsoukanh, S., Wang, C., 2019. Public-private partnership in land compensation for an eco-cultural park: game-theoretical analysis. WIT Transactions on Ecology and the Environment 217, 459–467.

Lewis, D.J., Barham, B.L., Zimmerer, K.S., 2008. Spatial externalities in agriculture: Empirical analysis, statistical identification, and policy implications. World Development 36, 1813–1829.

Lonsdorf, E.V., Koh, I., Ricketts, T., 2020. Partitioning private and external benefits of crop pollination services. People and Nature 2020,2, 811–820.

Millennium Ecosystem Assessment, 2005. Ecosystems and Human Well-being: Biodiversity Synthesis. World Resources Institute

McKensie, A.J., Emery, S.B., Franks, J.R., Whittingham, M.J., 2013. Landscape-scale conservation: collaborative agri-environment schemes could benefit both biodiversity and ecosystem services, but will farmers be willing to participate? Journal of Applied Ecology 50, 1274–1280.

Nguyen, C., Latacz-Lohmann, U., Hanley, N., Schilizzi, S., Iftekhar, S., 2022. Coordination Incentives for landscape-scale environmental management: A systematic review. Land Use Policy 114, 105936.

Nowak, M.A., Sigmund K., 1994. The alternating prisoner’s dilemma. Journal of Theoretical Biology 168, 219-226.

Parkhurst, G.M., Shogren, J.F., 2007. Spatial incentives to coordinate contiguous habitat. Ecological Economics 64, 344–355.

Parkhurst, G.M., Shogren, J.F., Bastian, C., Kivi, P., Donner, J., Smith, R.B.W., 2002. Agglomeration bonus: An incentive mechanism to reunite fragmented habitat for biodiversity conservation. Ecological Economics 41, 305–328.

Qiu, J., 2019. Effects of landscape pattern on pollination, pest control, water quality, flood regulation, and cultural ecosystem services: a literature review and future research prospects. Current Landscape Ecology Reports 4, 113–124.

Singerman, A., Useche, P., 2019. The role of strategic uncertainty in area-wide pest management decisions of Florida citrus growers. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 101, 991–1011.

Stark, H.-U., Helbing, D., Schönhof, M., Hołyst, J.A., 2008. Alternating cooperation strategies in a route choice game: theory, experiments, and effects of a learning scenario. In: A. Innocenti, P. Sbriglia (eds.), Games, Rationality and Behavior, Palgrave MacMillan, Houndmills and New York, pp. 256–273.