Patent policy, invention and innovation in the theory of Schumpeterian growth

Klein, Michael (2024): Patent policy, invention and innovation in the theory of Schumpeterian growth.

Abstract

I develop an endogenous growth model that separates firm decisions to invent, patent, and commercialize new innovations. I use the model to examine how multiple dimensions of patent policy impact economic growth by shaping these relative incentives. I pay particular attention to the role of patenting requirements that dictate how far along the development process an inventor must progress to obtain a patent. The model formalizes how strengthening such requirements generates competing effects on economic growth; stronger requirements reduce ex ante research incentives by increasing the expected cost of patenting, but increase ex post incentives to fully develop patented inventions into commercial innovations by decreasing the additional cost associated with commercialization. Overall, my analysis supports the use of patenting requirements as an effective policy tool to improve economic outcomes by shifting incentives away from invention in the pursuit of patents and towards the development of commercial innovations.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: Patent policy; Patenting requirements; Invention; Innovation; Economic growth
• Subjects: O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O3 - Innovation ; Research and Development ; Technological Change ; Intellectual Property Rights > O31 - Innovation and Invention: Processes and Incentives; O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O3 - Innovation ; Research and Development ; Technological Change ; Intellectual Property Rights > O34 - Intellectual Property and Intellectual Capital; O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O4 - Economic Growth and Aggregate Productivity > O43 - Institutions and Growth

References

Acs, Z. J. and Sanders, M. (2012). Patents, knowledge spillovers, and entrepreneurship. Small Business Economics, 39 (4), 801–817.

Aghion, P. and Howitt, P. (1992). A model of growth through creative destruction. Econometrica, 60 (2), 323–51.

Basu, S. (2019). Are price-cost markups rising in the united states? a discussion of the evidence. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 33 (3), 3–22.

Bilir, L. K. (2014). Patent laws, product life-cycle lengths, and multinational activity. American Economic Review, 104 (7), 1979–2013.

Burk, D. L. and Lemley, M. A. (2003). Policy levers in patent law. Virginia Law Review, pp. 1575– 1696.

Chen, X. and Shao, Y. (2020). Product life-cycle, knowledge capital, and comparative advantage. Review of international economics, 28 (1), 252–278.

Chu, A. C. (2009). Effects of blocking patents on R&D: A quantitative DGE analysis. Journal of Economic Growth, 14 (1), 55–78.

Chu, A. C. (2022). Patent policy and economic growth: A survey. The Manchester School, 90 (2), 237–254.

Chu, A. C., Cozzi, G., Fan, H., Furukawa, Y. and Liao, C.-H. (2019). Innovation and inequality in a monetary Schumpeterian model with heterogeneous households and firms. Review of Economic Dynamics, 34, 141–164.

Chu, A. C., Cozzi, G., Fan, H., Pan, S. and Zhang, M. (2020). Do stronger patents stimulate or stifle innovation? the crucial role of financial development. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, 52 (5), 1305–1322.

Chu, A. C., Cozzi, G., Furukawa, Y. and Liao, C.-H. (2017). Inflation and economic growth in a Schumpeterian model with endogenous entry of heterogeneous firms. European Economic Review, 98, 392–409.

Chu, A. C., Cozzi, G. and Galli, S. (2012). Does intellectual monopoly stimulate or stifle innovation? European Economic Review, 56 (4), 727–746.

Chu, A. C., Furukawa, Y. and Ji, L. (2016). Patents, R&D subsidies, and endogenous market structure in a Schumpeterian economy. Southern Economic Journal, 82 (3), 809–825. 39

Chu, A. C., Furukawa, Y., Mallick, S., Peretto, P. and Wang, X. (2021). Dynamic effects of patent policy on inno- vation and inequality in a schumpeterian economy. Economic Theory, 71, 1429–1465.

Cohen, W. M., Goto, A., Nagata, A., Nelson, R. R. and Walsh, J. P. (2002). R&D spillovers, patents and the incentives to innovate in Japan and the United States. Research Policy, 31 (8-9), 1349–1367.

Cotropia, C. A. (2009). The folly of early filing in patent law. Hastings LJ, 61, 65.

Cozzi, G. and Galli, S. (2014). Sequential R&D and blocking patents in the dynamics of growth. Journal of Economic Growth, 19 (2), 183–219.

Cozzi, G. and Galli, S. (2017). Should the government protect its basic research? Economics Letters, 157, 122– 124.

Deng, Y. (2011). A dynamic stochastic analysis of international patent application and renewal processes. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 29 (6), 766–777.

Dyer, T. A., Glaeser, S., Lang, M. H. and Sprecher, C. (2024). The effect of patent disclosure quality on innovation. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 77 (2-3), 101647.

Fagerberg, J. (2005). Innovation: A guide to the literature. In J. Fagerberg, D. C. Mowery and R. R. Nelson (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Innovation, Oxford University Press.

Gersbach, H., Sorger, G. and Amon, C. (2018). Hierarchical growth: Basic and applied research. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 90, 434–459.

Grossman, G. M. and Helpman, E. (1991). Quality ladders in the theory of growth. The Review of Economic Studies, 58 (1), 43–61.

Grossman, G. M. and Oberfield, E. (2022). The elusive explanation for the declining labor share. Annual Review of Economics, 14 (1), 93–124.

Gutiérrez, G. and Philippon, T. (2017). Declining Competition and Investment in the US. Tech. rep., National Bureau of Economic Research.

Hall, B., Helmers, C., Rogers, M. and Sena, V. (2014). The choice between formal and informal intellectual property: a review. Journal of Economic Literature, 52 (2), 375–423.

Impullitti, G. (2010). International competition and US R&D subsidies: A quantitative welfare analysis. International Economic Review, 51 (4), 1127–1158.

Jones, C. I. and Williams, J. C. (2000). Too much of a good thing? The economics of investment in R&D. Journal of Economic Growth, 5 (1), 65–85. 40

Karabarbounis, L. and Neiman, B. (2014). The global decline of the labor share. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 129 (1), 61–103.

Kishi, K. (2018). A patentability requirement and industry-targeted R&D. Macroeconomic Dynamics, 22 (4), 719–753.

Kishi, K. (2019). Technology diffusion, innovation size, and patent policy. European Economic Review, 118, 382–410.

Klein, M. A. (2020). Secrecy, the patent puzzle and endogenous growth. European Economic Review, 126, 103445.

Klein, M. A. (2022). The reward and contract theories of patents in a model of endogenous growth. European Economic Review, p. 104178.

Klein, M. A. and S ̧ener, F. (2023). Product innovation, diffusion and endogenous growth. Review of Economic Dynamics, 48, 178–201.

Klein, M. A. and Yang, Y. (2024). Blocking patents, rent protection and economic growth. Review of Economic Dynamics, 52, 1–20.

Koléda, G. (2008). Promoting innovation and competition with patent policy. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 18 (3-4), 433–453.

Lemley, M. A. (2008). Ignoring patents. Mich. St. L. Rev., p. 19.

Lemley, M. A. (2016). Ready for patenting. B.U.L. Rev., 96, 1171.

Mattes, E., Stacey, M. C. and Marinova, D. (2006). Surveying inventors listed on patents to investigate determinants of innovation. Scientometrics, 69 (3), 475–498.

Michelacci, C. (2003). Low returns in r&d due to the lack of entrepreneurial skills. The Economic Journal, 113 (484), 207–225.

O’donoghue, T. and Zweimüller, J. (2004). Patents in a model of endogenous growth. Journal of Economic Growth, 9 (1), 81–123.

Roin, B. N. (2005). The disclosure function of the patent system (or lack thereof). Harvard Law Review.

Schumpeter, J. A. (1939a). Business cycles: a theoretical, historical and statistical analysis of the capitalist process. McGraw Hill Book Company.

Schumpeter, J. A. (1939b). The Theory of Economic Development. Harvard University Press. 41

Segerstrom, P. S., Anant, T. C. and Dinopoulos, E. (1990). A Schumpeterian model of the product life cycle. The American Economic Review, pp. 1077–1091.

Sichelman, T. (2009). Commercializing patents. Stan. L. Rev., 62, 341.

Suzuki, K. and Kishimoto, S. (2023). Leading patent breadth, endogenous quality choice, and economic growth. Working Paper.

Torrisi, S., Gambardella, A., Giuri, P., Harhoff, D., Hoisl, K. and Mariani, M. (2016). Used, blocking and sleeping patents: Empirical evidence from a large-scale inventor survey. Research policy, 45 (7), 1374–1385.

Walsh, J. P., Lee, Y.-N. and Jung, T. (2016). Win, lose or draw? the fate of patented inventions. Research Policy, 45 (7), 1362–1373.

Webster, E. and Jensen, P. H. (2011). Do patents matter for commercialization? The Journal of Law and Economics, 54 (2), 431–453.

Yang, Y. (2018). On the optimality of IPR protection with blocking patents. Review of Economic Dynamics, 27, 205–230.