The Consequences of Working from home on Well-Being: Evidence from the French Workforce

白, 祁明 (2025): The Consequences of Working from home on Well-Being: Evidence from the French Workforce.

Abstract

The global transition to working from home, accelerated by the COVID-19 pandemic, has fundamentally transformed traditional work patterns. In France, where work-life balance is culturally emphasized, this change presents unique challenges This study analyzes data from 66,839 French workers (2010-2015) to explore the impact of remote work on employee well-being, with a particular focus on anxiety levels and work-family balance.Contrary to conventional wisdom, working from home itself does not significantly affect anxiety levels. Instead, well-being is primarily influenced by factors such as age, gender, education level, and family size. Specifically, age exhibits a U-shaped relationship with anxiety, men report lower anxiety levels, higher education is negatively correlated with anxiety, and larger family size is positively correlated with well-being.The impact varies significantly across demographic groups, especially for employees with young children and self-employed individuals. This study reveals nuanced effects of remote work and highlights the moderating role of demographic and occupational factors, contributing to the literature on working from home.It also underscores the importance of France's unique cultural context in shaping working from home experiences. These findings indicate that organizations should implement customized support systems and develop targeted mental health resources, moving away from generic policies to effectively address the diverse needs of employees.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: Working from home, Employee well-being, Anxiety levels, Work-family balance, Cultural context
• Subjects: C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C1 - Econometric and Statistical Methods and Methodology: General; J - Labor and Demographic Economics > J2 - Demand and Supply of Labor > J24 - Human Capital ; Skills ; Occupational Choice ; Labor Productivity; J - Labor and Demographic Economics > J8 - Labor Standards: National and International > J81 - Working Conditions

References

1.Grant, C. A., Wallace, L. M., & Spurgeon, P. C. (2013). An exploration of the psychological factors affecting remote e-workers' job effectiveness, well-being, and work-life balance. Employee Relations, 35(5), 527-546.

2. Diener, E., Lucas, R. E., & Oishi, S. (2018). Advances in subjective well-being research. Nature Human Behaviour, 2 (4), 391-400.

3.Le Feuvre, N., & Lemarchant, C. (2007). Employment, the Family and ‘Work-Life Balance’ in France. In R. Crompton, S. Lewis, & C. Lyonette (Eds.), Women, Men, Work and Family in Europe (pp. 197-216).

4.Anderson, D., & Kelliher, C. (2020). Enforced remote working and the work-life interface during lockdown. Gender in Management: An International Journal, 35(7/8), 677-683.

5.Belzunegui-Eraso, A., & Erro-Garcés, A. (2020). Teleworking in the context of the Covid-19 crisis. Sustainability (Switzerland), 12 (9).

6.Bakaç, C., Zyberaj, J., & Barela, J. C. (2023). Predicting employee telecommuting preferences and job outcomes amid COVID-19 pandemic: a latent profile analysis. Current Psychology, 42 (10), 8680–8695.

7.Mihelić, K. K., & Aleksić, D. (2017). “Dear Employer, Let Me Introduce Myself” – Flow, Satisfaction with Work–Life Balance and Millennials’ Creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 29 (4), 397-408.

8.Elliott, M. (2013). Gender differences in the causes of work and family strain among academic faculty. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 82 (3), 234-245.

9.McDowall, A., & Kinman, G. (2017). The new nowhere land? A research and practice agenda for the "always on" culture. Journal of Organizational Effectiveness: People and Performance, 4(3), 256-266.

10.Allen, T. D., Herst, D. E. L., Bruck, C. S., & Sutton, M. (2000). Consequences associated with work-to-family conflict: A review and agenda for future research. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 5(2), 278–308.

11.Clark, S. C. (2000). Work/family border theory: A new theory of work/family balance. Human Relations, 53(6), 747-770.

12.Le Feuvre, N., & Lemarchant, C. (2007). Employment, the family and “work-life balance” in France. In R. Crompton, S. Lewis, & C. Lyonette (Eds.), Women, men, work and family in Europe (pp. 210-229). Palgrave Macmillan.

13.Beigi, M., Shirmohammadi, M., & Stewart, J. (2018). Flexible work arrangements and work-family conflict: A metasynthesis of qualitative studies among academics. Human Resource Development Review, 17 (3), 314-336.

14.Greenhaus, J. H., & Powell, G. N. (2006). When work and family are allies: A theory of work-family enrichment. Academy of Management Review, 31(1), 72-92.

15.McCloskey, D. W., & Igbaria, M. (2003). Does "Out of Sight" Mean "Out of Mind"? An Empirical Investigation of the Career Advancement Prospects of Telecommuters. Information Resources Management Journal, 16 (2), 19-34.

16.Forret, M. L., & Dougherty, T. W. (2004). Networking behaviors and career outcomes: Differences for men and women? Journal of Organizational Behavior, 22(4), 331-345.

17.Ipsen, C., Kirchner, K., Andersone, N., & Karanika-Murray, M. (2022). Becoming a Distance Manager: Managerial Experiences, Perceived Organizational Support, and Job Satisfaction During the COVID-19 Pandemic. Frontiers in Psychology, 13 , Article 916234.

18.Billett, S. (2011). Subjectivity, self and personal agency in learning through and for work. Journal of Vocational Education & Training, 63 (1), 1-15.

19.Kraut, R. E., Kiesler, S., Boneva, B., Cummings, J., Helgeson, V., & Crawford, A. (1998). Internet paradox: A social technology that reduces social involvement and psychological well-being? American Psychologist , 53(9), 1017-1031.

20.Cain, S. (2013). Quiet: The power of introverts in a world that can't stop talking . Crown Publishing Group.

21.Chung, H., & Tijdens, K. (2013). Working time flexibility components and working time regimes in Europe: Using company-level data across 21 countries. International Journal of Human Resource Management , 24(7), 1418-1434.

22.Charalampous, M., Grant, C. A., Tramontano, C., & Michailidis, E. (2019). Systematically reviewing remote e-workers’ well-being at work: A multidimensional approach. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 28(1), 51-73.

23.Belzunegui-Eraso, Á., & Erro-Garcés, A. (2020). Teleworking in the context of the Covid-19 crisis. Sustainability, 12(9), 3662.

24.Magnini, V. P. (2009). Understanding and reducing work-family conflict in the hospitality industry. Journal of Human Resources in Hospitality & Tourism, 8(2), 119-136.

25.Demerouti, E., Derks, D., Ten Brummelhuis, L. L., & Bakker, A. B. (2014). New ways of working: Impact on working conditions, work-family balance, and well-being. In C. Korunka, & P. Hoonakker (Eds.), The impact of ICT on quality of working life (pp. 123-141).

26.Conway, N., Kiefer, T., Hartley, J., & Briner, R. B. (2014). Doing more with less? Employee reactions to psychological contract breach via target similarity or spillover during public sector organizational change. British Journal of Management, 25(4), 737-754.

27.Hackman, J. R., & Oldham, G. R. (1976). Motivation through the design of work: Test of a theory. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 16(2), 250-279.

28.Chung, H., & van der Lippe, T. (2020). Flexible working, work-life balance, and gender equality: Introduction. Social Indicators Research, 151(2), 365-381.

29.Gajendran, R. S., & Harrison, D. A. (2007). The good, the bad, and the unknown about telecommuting: Meta-analysis of psychological mediators and individual consequences. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(6), 1524-1541.

30.Golden, T. D., Veiga, J. F., & Dino, R. N. (2008). The impact of professional isolation on teleworker job performance and turnover intentions: Does time spent teleworking, interacting face-to-face, or having access to communication-enhancing technology matter? Journal of Applied Psychology, 93(6), 1412-1421.

31.Allen, T. D., Golden, T. D., & Shockley, K. M. (2015). How effective is telecommuting? Assessing the status of our scientific findings. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 16(2), 40-68.