Incremental Innovation by Heterogeneous Incumbents and Economic Growth: relationship between two sources of growth

Ohki, Kazuyoshi (2025): Incremental Innovation by Heterogeneous Incumbents and Economic Growth: relationship between two sources of growth.

Abstract

In this paper, we construct a tractable endogenous growth model that incorporates both incremental innovation by heterogeneous incumbents and innovation by entrants. Our model features two endogenous sources of growth: quality improvement (vertical growth) and expansion in the variety of goods (horizontal growth). We then examine the policy effects of a subsidy for incremental innovation by incumbents and a subsidy for innovation by entrants on the overall economic growth rate, as well as on the relationship between the two sources of growth. Our model confirms that incumbents with higher profit flows tend to engage in incremental innovation for a longer duration and incur greater innovation costs, which is consistent with both Schumpeter's hypothesis and the findings of Christensen (1997) Additionally, the model generates counterintuitive results that are not commonly found in the conventional literature. First, a subsidy for incremental innovation by incumbents may reduce the entry of new firms. Second, a subsidy for innovation by entrants may have a negative effect on the overall economic growth rate.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: Economic Growth, \&D, In-house model, Firm-Heterogeneity, Innovation by Incumbents, IPR policy, Incremental Innovation, Sustaining Innovation
• Subjects: O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O3 - Innovation ; Research and Development ; Technological Change ; Intellectual Property Rights > O31 - Innovation and Invention: Processes and Incentives; O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O3 - Innovation ; Research and Development ; Technological Change ; Intellectual Property Rights > O32 - Management of Technological Innovation and R&D; O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O3 - Innovation ; Research and Development ; Technological Change ; Intellectual Property Rights > O33 - Technological Change: Choices and Consequences ; Diffusion Processes; O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O3 - Innovation ; Research and Development ; Technological Change ; Intellectual Property Rights > O34 - Intellectual Property and Intellectual Capital; O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O4 - Economic Growth and Aggregate Productivity > O41 - One, Two, and Multisector Growth Models

References

Acemoglu, D., Akcigit, U., 2012, Intellectual property rights policy, competition and innovation, Journal of the European Economic Association 10(1), 1--42.

Acemoglu, D., Cao, D., 2015, Innovation by entrants and incumbents, Journal of Economic Theory 157, 255--294.

Aghion, P., Harris, C., Howitt, P., Vickers, J., 2001, Competition, imitation and growth with step-by-step innovation, Review of Economic Studies 68(3), 467--492.

Aghion, P., Harris, C. and Vickers, J., 1997, Competition and growth with step-by-step innovation: an example, European Economic Review 41(3--5), 771--782.

Aghion, P. and Howitt, P., 1992, A model of growth through creative destruction, Econometrica 60(2), 323--351.

Akcigit, U. and Kerr, W., 2018, Growth through heterogeneous innovations, Journal of Political Economy 126(4), 1374--1443.

Arrow, K. J., 1962, The economic implications of learning by doing. The review of economic studies, 29(3), 155--173.

Basu, S., 1996, Procyclical productivity: increasing returns or cyclical utilization? Q J Econ 111, 719--751

Bartelsman, E.J. and Doms, M., 2000, Understanding productivity: lessons from longitudinal microdata, Journal of Economic Literature 38(3), 569--594.

Bessen, J., 2008, The value of US patents by owner and patent characteristics. Research Policy, 37(5), 932--945.

Christensen, C., 1997, The innovator's dilemma: when new technologies cause great firms to fail, Boston, Massachusetts, USA: Harvard Business School Press.

Chu, A. C., 2011, The welfare cost of one-size-fits-all patent protection. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 35(6), 876--890.

Chu, A. C., 2022, Patent policy and economic growth: A survey. The Manchester School, 90(2), 237--254.

Chu, A., Cozzi, G., Furukawa, Y., Liao, C.H, 2017. Inflation and economic growth in a Schumpeterian model with endogenous entry of heterogeneous firms," European Economic Review, 98(C), 392-409.

Chu, A., Cozzi, G., Fang, H., Furukawa, Y., Liao, C.H., 2019. Innovation and Inequality in a Monetary Schumpeterian Model with Heterogeneous Households and Firms, Review of Economic Dynamics, 34, 141--164.

Chu, A. C., Cozzi, G., and Galli, S., 2012, Does intellectual monopoly stimulate or stifle innovation?, European Economic Review, 56(4), 727--746.

Chu, A. C., and Peretto, P. F., 2023, Innovation and inequality from stagnation to growth, European Economic Review, 160, 104615.

Cohen, W.M., 1995, Empirical studies of Innovative Activity, Handbook of the Economics of Innovation and Technological Change, 182--264.

Cohen, W.M., Levin R.C., 1989, Empirical studies of Innovation and Market Structure, Handbook of Industrial Organization, 1059--1107.

Connolly, M. and Peretto P. F., 2003. Industry and the family: two engines of growth. Journal of Economic Growth, 8, 115--148.

Denicolo, V. and Zanchettin, P., 2012, Leadership cycles in a quality-ladder model of endogenous growth, Economic Journal, 122, 618--650.

Dixit, A., Stiglitz, J., 1977, Monopolistic competition and optimum product diversity, The American Economic Review, 67(3), 297--308.

Dinopoulos, E., and Thompson, P., 1998, Schumpeterian growth without scale effects, Journal of Economic Growth, 3(4), 313--335.

Etro, F., 2004, Innovation by leaders, Economic Journal 114(495), 281--303.

Foster, L., Haltiwanger, J. C., and Krizan, C. J., 2001. Aggregate productivity growth: Lessons from microeconomic evidence. In New developments in productivity analysis, University of Chicago Press, 303--372.

Futagami K., Iwaisako T., 2007, Dynamic analysis of patent policy in an endogenous growth model, Journal of Econommic Theory, 132 (1), 306--334

Goh, A. T., and Olivier, J., 2002, Optimal patent protection in a two-sector economy. International Economic Review, 43(4), 1191--1214.

Grossman, G., Helpman, E., 1991, Innovation and Growth in the Global Economy, MIT Press.

Hillenbrand, P., Kiewell, D., Miller-Cheevers, R., Ostojic, I., & Springer, G. (2019). Traditional company, new businesses: The pairing that can ensure an incumbent's survival. McKinsey & Company, 28.

Howitt, P., 1999, Steady endogenous growth with population and R\&D inputs growing, Journal of Political Economy, 107(4), 715--730.

Iwaisako, T., 2020, Welfare effects of patent protection in a semi-endogenous growth model. Macroeconomic Dynamics, 24(3), 708--728.

Iwaisako, T., and Futagami, K., 2003, Patent policy in an endogenous growth model. Journal of Economics, 239--258.

Iwaisako, T., Ohki, K., 2019, Innovation by Heterogeneous Leaders, The Scandinavian Journal of Economics 121(4), 1673--1704

Jones, C.I., Williams, J.C., 2000, Too much of a good thing? the economics of investment in R\&D. Journal of Economic Growth 5, 65--85

Kiedaisch, C. 2015, Intellectual property rights in a quality-ladder model with persistent leadership, European Economic Review 80(C), 194--213.

Klette, T.J., Kortum, S., 2004, Innovating Firms and Aggregate Innovation, Journal of Political Economy, 112(5), 986--1018.

Ledezma, I. 2013, Defensive Strategies in Quality Ladders,Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control 37, 176--194.

Li, C. W., 2001, On the policy implications of endogenous technological progress. The Economic Journal, 111(471), 164--179.

Lucas Jr, R. E., 1988, On the mechanics of economic development. Journal of monetary economics, 22(1), 3--42.

Melitz, M., 2003, The impact of trade on intra-industry reallocations and aggregate industry productivity, Econometrica, 71, 1695--1725.

Minniti, A., Parello, C., and Segerstrom, P. S., 2013, A Schumpeterian Growth Model with Random Quality Improvements,Economic Theory 52, 755--791.

Norrbin, S.C., 1993, The relation between price and marginal cost in US industry: a contradiction. Journal of Political Economy 101, 1149--1164.

Ohki, K., 2023, Disruptive Innovation by Heterogeneous Incumbents and Economic Growth: When do incumbents switch to new technology? Journal of Mathematical Economics 107, 102859.

Parello, C., 2019, R\&D policy and competition in a Schumpeterian growth model with heterogeneous firms, Oxford Economic Papers, 71(1) 187--202.

Peretto, P. F., 1996, Sunk costs, market structure, and growth. International Economic Review, 895--923.

Peretto, P, 1998, Technological change and population growth, Journal of Economic Growth 3 (4), 283--311.

Peretto, P. F., 2003, Fiscal policy and long-run growth in R\&D-based models with endogenous market structure, Journal of Economic Growth, 8, 325--347.

Peretto, P. F., 2007, Corporate taxes, growth and welfare in a Schumpeterian economy, Journal of Economic Theory, 137(1), 353--382.

Peretto, P. F., and Connolly, M., 2007, The manhattan metaphor. Journal of Economic Growth, 12, 329--350.

Romer, P. M., 1986, Increasing returns and long-run growth. Journal of political economy, 94(5), 1002--1037.

Romer, P. M., 1990, Endogenous technological change. Journal of political Economy, 98(5, Part 2), S71--S102.

Saito, Y., 2017, Effects of patent protection on economic growth and welfare in a two-R\&D-sector economy. Economic modelling, 62, 124--129.

Segerstrom, P., Anant, T C A and Dinopoulos, E., 1990, A Schumpeterian Model of the Product Life Cycle, American Economic Review, 80(5), 1077--1091.

Segerstrom, P. S., 2007, Intel Economics,International Economic Review 48, 247--280.

Segerstrom, P. S. and Zornierek, J. M., 1999, The R\&D Incentives of Industry Leaders,International Economic Review 40, 745--766.

Smulders, S. and and Van de Klundert, T, 1995, Imperfect competition, concentration and growth with firm-specific R\&D, European Economic Review, 39(1), 139--160.

Small and Medium Enterprise Agency, 2023, White Paper on Small and Medium Enterprises in Japan.

Thompson, P., Waldo, D., 1994, Growth and Trustified Capitalism, Journal of Monetary Economics 34, 455--462.

World-Bank, 2023, World bank indicators. Report, Washington

Young, A., 1998, Growth without scale effects, Journal of political economy, 106(1), 41--63.