Hedonic Adaptation and the Persistence of Suffering: A Model-Based Approach to Theodicy

Diaz Sanchez, Jose Luis (2025): Hedonic Adaptation and the Persistence of Suffering: A Model-Based Approach to Theodicy.

Abstract

Hedonic adaptation—the tendency to return to a baseline level of well-being after changes in life circumstances—offers a new perspective on theodicy, the attempt to reconcile suffering with a benevolent, omnipotent, and omniscient God. Since perceived suffering tends to revert to baseline, reductions in actual suffering may provide only temporary relief. This paper develops a simplified theoretical model, drawing on economic methods, to analyze how perceived suffering evolves over time, whether adjusting adaptation speeds could reduce distress, and what this reveals about the normative limits of benevolent intervention. The model demonstrates a structural trade-off: while slower adaptation may extend relief, it can also intensify distress during hardship. These dynamics lend support to soul-making theodicies by showing how persistent suffering fosters resilience and moral growth, and they echo free will theodicies by portraying adaptation as a built-in human feature, shaped by evolutionary pressures. At the same time, it challenges interventionist theodicies by emphasizing that suffering may persist despite benevolent efforts. It thereby invites greater attention to the recurrence of suffering, not only its intensity, as a concern for theodical reflection.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: Hedonic adaptation; perceived suffering; philosophy of religion; economic modeling; normative constraints.
• Subjects: A - General Economics and Teaching > A1 - General Economics > A12 - Relation of Economics to Other Disciplines; B - History of Economic Thought, Methodology, and Heterodox Approaches > B4 - Economic Methodology; D - Microeconomics > D0 - General > D03 - Behavioral Microeconomics: Underlying Principles; D - Microeconomics > D9 - Intertemporal Choice > D91 - Intertemporal Household Choice ; Life Cycle Models and Saving; Z - Other Special Topics > Z1 - Cultural Economics ; Economic Sociology ; Economic Anthropology > Z10 - General; Z - Other Special Topics > Z1 - Cultural Economics ; Economic Sociology ; Economic Anthropology > Z12 - Religion

References

Brickman, Philip, and Donald T. Campbell. 1971. “Hedonic Relativism and Planning the Good Society.” In Adaptation-Level Theory: A Symposium, edited by M. H. Appley, 287–302. New York: Academic Press.

Brickman, Philip, Dan Coates, and Ronnie Janoff-Bulman. 1978. “Lottery Winners and Accident Victims: Is Happiness Relative?” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 36 (8): 917–27.

Clark, Andrew E., Paul Frijters, and Michael A. Shields. 2008. “Relative Income, Happiness, and Utility: An Explanation for the Easterlin Paradox and Other Puzzles.” Journal of Economic Literature 46 (1): 95–144.

Diener, Ed, and Martin E. P. Seligman. 2004. “Beyond Money: Toward an Economy of Well-Being.” Psychological Science in the Public Interest 5 (1): 1–31.

Diener, Ed, Richard E. Lucas, and Christie Napa Scollon. 2006. “Beyond the Hedonic Treadmill: Revising the Adaptation Theory of Well-Being.” American Psychologist 61 (4): 305–14.

Dostoyevsky, Fyodor. 1880. The Brothers Karamazov.

Easterlin, Richard A. 1974. “Does Economic Growth Improve the Human Lot? Some Empirical Evidence.” In Nations and Households in Economic Growth: Essays in Honor of Moses Abramovitz, edited by Paul A. David and Melvin W. Reder, 89–125. New York: Academic Press.

Easterlin, Richard A. 2001. “Building a Better Theory of Well-Being.” Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 45 (3): 289–318.

Frederick, Shane, and George Loewenstein. 1999. “Hedonic Adaptation.” In Well-Being: The Foundations of Hedonic Psychology, edited by Daniel Kahneman, Ed Diener, and Norbert Schwarz, 302–29. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.

Graham, Carol. 2011. The Pursuit of Happiness: An Economy of Well-Being. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.

Hagerty, Michael R., and Ruut Veenhoven. 2003. “Wealth and Happiness Revisited: Growing National Income Does Go with Greater Happiness.” Social Indicators Research 64 (1): 1–27.

Hadot, Pierre. 1998. The Inner Citadel: The Meditations of Marcus Aurelius. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Hausman, Daniel M., and Michael S. McPherson. 2009. “Preference Satisfaction and Welfare Economics.” Economics and Philosophy 25 (1): 1–25.

Hick, John. 1966. Evil and the God of Love. London: Macmillan.

Hick, John. 1976. Death and Eternal Life. San Francisco: Harper and Row.

Inwood, Brad, and Lloyd P. Gerson. 1994. The Epicurus Reader: Selected Writings and Testimonia. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing Company.

Kahneman, Daniel, and Amos Tversky. 1979. “Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision under Risk.” Econometrica 47 (2): 263–91.

Leibniz, Gottfried Wilhelm. 1951. Theodicy: Essays on the Goodness of God, the Freedom of Man, and the Origin of Evil. Translated by E. M. Huggard. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul. Originally published 1710.

Lucas, Richard E., Andrew E. Clark, Yannis Georgellis, and Ed Diener. 2003. “Reexamining Adaptation and the Set Point Model of Happiness: Reactions to Changes in Marital Status.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 84 (3): 527–39.

Lucas, Richard E. 2007. “Long-Term Disability Is Associated with Lasting Changes in Subjective Well-Being: Evidence from Two Nationally Representative Longitudinal Studies.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 92 (4): 717–30.

Lyubomirsky, Sonja, and Lee Ross. 1997. “Hedonic Consequences of Social Comparison: A Contrast of Happy and Unhappy People.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 73 (6): 1141–57.

Nesse, Randolph M., and George C. Williams. 1994. Why We Get Sick: The New Science of Darwinian Medicine. New York: Vintage Books.

Parro, Francisco. 2021. “The Problem of Evil: An Economic Approach.” Kyklos 74 (4): 527–51.

Phillips, D. Z. 2004. The Problem of Evil and the Problem of God. Minneapolis: Fortress Press.

Pihlström, Sami. 2013. Taking Evil Seriously. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

Plantinga, Alvin. 1974. God, Freedom, and Evil. Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans.

Rayo, Luis, and Gary S. Becker. 2007. “Habits, Peers, and Happiness: An Evolutionary Perspective.” American Economic Review 97 (2): 487–91.

Rowe, William L. 1979. “The Problem of Evil and Some Varieties of Atheism.” American Philosophical Quarterly 16 (4): 335–41.

Schultz, Wolfram. 1998. “Predictive Reward Signal of Dopamine Neurons.” Journal of Neurophysiology 80 (1): 1–27.

Smart, J. J. C., and Bernard Williams. 1973. Utilitarianism: For and Against. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Stevenson, Betsey, and Justin Wolfers. 2008. “Economic Growth and Subjective Well-Being: Reassessing the Easterlin Paradox.” Brookings Papers on Economic Activity 2008 (1): 1–87.

Swinburne, Richard. 1998. Providence and the Problem of Evil. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Trakakis, Nick. 2007. The God Beyond Belief: In Defence of William Rowe's Evidential Argument from Evil. Dordrecht: Springer.