Model of the 2000 Presidential Election: Instrumenting for Ideology

Fernandez, Jose and Cataiefe, Guido (2009): Model of the 2000 Presidential Election: Instrumenting for Ideology.

Abstract

In a spatial model of voting, a voter's utility for a candidate is a function of ideological distance from the candidate and a candidate's quality. Candidate quality can potentially bias the measure of ideological distance in two ways. First, voters may be more drawn to high quality candidates thereby reducing the ideological distance. Second, a candidate's ideological position is a function of rivals�qualities and his own quality. We derive a theoretical model to sign the direction of both biases analytically. Next, using techniques established in the industrial organization literature, we estimate the model using two sets of instrumental variables.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: spatial voting, discrete choice, instrumental variables
• Subjects: C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C3 - Multiple or Simultaneous Equation Models ; Multiple Variables > C35 - Discrete Regression and Qualitative Choice Models ; Discrete Regressors ; Proportions; D - Microeconomics > D7 - Analysis of Collective Decision-Making > D72 - Political Processes: Rent-Seeking, Lobbying, Elections, Legislatures, and Voting Behavior

References

Alvarez, M. and J. Nagler (1998). "Economics, Entitlements and Social Issues: Voter Choice in the 1996 Presidential Election". American Journal of Political Science 42: 1349-63.

Ansolabehere, S. and J. M. Snyder (2000). "Valence politics and equilibrium in spatial election models." Public Choice 103: 327 336.

Aragones, E. and T. Palfrey (2002). "Mixed Equilibrium in a Downsian Model with a Favored Candidate." Journal of Economic Theory 103: 131-61

Aragones, E. and T. Palfrey (2004). "The E¤ect of Candidate Quality on Electoral Equilibrium: An Experimental Study." American Political Science Review 98 : 77-90.

Banks, J. S., and J. Duggan (2005)."The Theory of Probabilistic Voting in the Spatial Model of Elections." In D. Austen-Smith and J. Duggan [Eds.], Social Choice and Strategic Decisions, Heidelberg: Springer.

Callander, S. (2005). "Electoral competition in heterogenous districts." Journal of Political Economy 113: 1116-45.

D. Aspremont, C., Gabszewicz, J.J. and J.F. Thisse(1929). "On Hotelling's stability in competition," Econometrica 47: 1145-150.

Degan, A. (2007). "Candidate valence: Evidence from consecutive presidential elections." International Economic Review 48: 457-82.

Downs, A. (1957). "An Economic Theory of Political Action in a Democracy." Journal of Political Economy 65 : 135-50.

Groseclose, T. (2001) "A Model of Candidate Location When One Candidate Has a Valence Advantage." American Journal of Political Science. 45: 862-86

Hotelling, H. (1929) "Stability in Competition." The Economic Journal 39: 41-57.

Lin, T., M. J. Enelow, and H. Dorussen (1999) "Equilibrium in Multicandidate Probabilistic Spatial Voting." Public Choice 98: 59-82.

Levitt, S. (1996). "How Do Senators Vote? Disentangling the Role of Voter Preferences, Party A¢ liation, and Senator Ideology." The American Economic Review 86: 425-41.

Quinn, K. and A. Martin (2002). "An Integrated Computational Model of Multiparty Electoral Competition." Statistical Science 17: 405-419

McKelvey, R. D., and J. W. Patty (2006). "A Theory of Voting in Large Elections." Games and Economic Behavior 57: 155-180.

McFadden, D. (1973) �Conditional Logit Analysis of Qualitative Choice Behavior, inP. Zarembka (ed.) Frontiers in Econometrics, Academic Press, New York.

Newey, W. (1985) "Maximum Likelihood Estimation testing and conditional moment tests." Econometrica 53: 1047-1070.

Newey,W. (1987) "Efficient Estimation of Limited Dependent Variable Models with Endogenous Explanatory Variables" Journal of Econometrics 36: 230-251.

Schofield, N. (2006) "Equilibria in the spatial stochastic model of voting with party activists" Review of Economic Design 10, 183-203.

Schofield, N. and G. Miller (2003) "Activists and Partisan Realignment." American Political Science Review 97: 245-60.

Schofield, N. and I. Sened (2006). Multiparty Democracy. Cambridge University Press.

Stern, S. (1994) "Two Dynamic Discrete Choice Estimation Problems and Simulation Method Solutions," Review of Economics and Statistics 76(4): 695-702.

Svodoba, E. (2008). "All politics is micro: six political strategists who study what you eat, what you drive, and where you shop. " Fast Company Magazine, October.

Villas-Boas, J. M. and R. S. Winer (1999). "Endogeneity in Brand Choice Models." Management Science Volume 45 , Issue 10: 1324 - 1338.