Instruments of policy analysis. the impact assessment development by public authorities in Romania. Case study

Matei, Ani and Dogaru, Tatiana-Camelia (2011): Instruments of policy analysis. the impact assessment development by public authorities in Romania. Case study. Published in: , Vol. The 19, (15 July 2011)

Abstract

The public authorities are facing real challenges due to the complexity and dynamics of economic and social issues. They must daily assess the available resources and answer to questions such as „is the citizens’ welfare good enough, can it be improved?” „there are the initiatives for the environmental protection adequate?”, „is there a coherent employment system for integrating the graduates on labour market?”, „are the charges pertinent means for improving the social actors’ behaviour?”. These issues as well as many others represent only a part of the problems that must be solved through public intervention.

The economic difficulties often represent the strongest key factor for non-transforming a social issue into the object of a public policy. They are also responsible for imposing to the decision-maker the compulsoriness of choosing to solve certain problems. This choice is never easy and it haggles always a pit of doubt inside the heart of the decision-maker: „is this decision the best choice?”, or „is the selected alternative the best for action?”. Diminishing this dilemma, as well as supporting the decision-maker in order to improve the decision-making process have found their expression in the theorists and practitioners’ efforts to develop the states’ capacity for public policy analysis. There are quite many definitions for public policy analysis in the field literature; they support its duality, namely the public policy analysis represents an approach as well as a methodology for developing and investigating public policy alternatives. Among the well-know instruments of policy analysis, we enumerate the cost-effectiveness analysis, the cost-benefit analysis, and the impact assessment.

In this paper the attention is focusing on impact assessments. Therefore, the objectives of the paper refer to (a) a brief overview on the instruments of policy analysis with a particular focus on the impact assessment and (b) an investigation of the national practice on the development of the impact assessment. In this paper, we shall analyze how the public institutions are using the impact assessment in view to improve the quality and coherence of the policy development process. Therefore, in order to attain our aims, the paper will comprise a theoretical part based on the study of the field literature and European and domestic regulation concerning the impact assessment and an empirical part, related to the analysis of some impact assessments from educational and regional development areas, drawn up by Romanian public authorities during the public policy process.

The conclusions will reveal the progresses made by Romania to use the impact assessments and the possible inconsistencies between the national model and that proposed by the European Commission. As research methodology for achieving the aims, we shall use the following: researching the bibliographical sources, comparative analysis between the European and the domestic legislation regarding the impact assessment, analysis and evaluation of the public policy proposals and other important documents.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: Public policy analysis, cost-benefit analysis, impact assessment, Romania
• Subjects: I - Health, Education, and Welfare > I1 - Health > I18 - Government Policy ; Regulation ; Public Health; D - Microeconomics > D7 - Analysis of Collective Decision-Making > D78 - Positive Analysis of Policy Formulation and Implementation; I - Health, Education, and Welfare > I2 - Education and Research Institutions > I28 - Government Policy

References

Bardach, Eugene. 2000. Practical Guide for Policy Analysis: The Eightfold Path to More Effective Problem Solving. New York: Chatham House Publishers;

Briggs, Sandra , Petersone, Baiba, and Smits, Karlis. 2006. Handbook of methods used in planning public policies and impact appraisal [in Romanian], General Secretariat of Government: Romania;

Ciolan, Lucian, Noel, Hibbert, Radu, Munteanu, and Cătălina, Ulrich. 2009. Handbook for ex-ante impact assessment of education policy [in Romanian]. Bucharest: General Secretariat of the Government;

Drăgan, Gabriela, and Agnes Nicolescu. 2009. Impact assessment – tools for a better regulation of public policies in European Union [in Romanian], Collection of European Institute of Romania, no. 24, Bucharest: European Institute of Romania;

European Commission. 2009. Impact Assessment Guidelines, SEC(2009) 92 Bruxelles: European Commission;

European Commission. 2005. A Handbook for Impact Assessment in the Commission - How to do an Impact Assessment; Bruxelles: European Commission;

European Commission, Impact Assessment of European Commission Policies: Achievements and Prospects Statement of the EEAC Working Group on Governance;

Fischer, Frank, Gerald, Miller, and Mara, Sidney. 2007. Handbook of Public Policy Analysis Theory,Politics and Methods, New York: Taylor&Francis Group;

Geva-May, Iris, and Aaron, Wildavsky. 1997. An Oprational Approach to Policy Analyis: The Craft,Boston: Kluwer;

OECD. 2001. Improving Policy Instruments Through Impact Assessment. SIGMA PAPER, nr.31;

Hirkpatrick, Colin, and David, Parker. 2007. Regulatory impact assessment: towards better regulations?UK: Edward Elgar Publishing;

Government Decision no. 870/2006 regarding the approval of strategy for improving the elaboration,coordination and planning of public policy at central level”;

International Association for Impact Assessment. 2003. What Is Impact Assessment? available online at the website http://www.iaia.org/publicdocuments/special-publications/What%20is%20IA_web.pdf; Social Impact Assessment International Principles, available online at the website http://www.iaia.org/ publicdocuments/special-publications/SP2 .pdf, accessed on 28 March 2011;

Klaus, Jacob, Julia, Hertin, Peter, Hjerp, Claudio, Radaelli, Anne, Meuwese, Oliver, Wolf, Carolina, Pacchi, and Kluas, Rennings. 2008. Improving the Practice of Impact Assessment, EVIA - Evaluating Integrated Impact Assessment;

Peter, Knoepfel, Corinne, Larrue, Frédéric, Varone, and Michael, Hill. 2007. Public Policy Analysis, Great Britain: The Policy Press;

Kotchen, Matthew. 2010. Cost-Benefit Analysis, Encyclopedia of Climate and Weather, second edition,edited by Stephen, Schneider, New York: Oxford University Press, forthcoming;

Lane, Jan-Erik. 2000. The Public Sector. Concepts, Models and Approace, London: Sage;

Lee, Norman, and Colin Kirkpatrick. 2006. Evidence-based policy-making in Europe: an evaluation of EC integrated impact assessments. Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, no. 24;

Matei, Ani. 2003. Public Economy. Economic Analysis of public decision [in Romanian], Bucharest:Economica Publishing House;

Matei, Lucica. 2009. Romanian Public Management Reform, Theoretical and Empirical Studies, Volume 1. Administration and Public Services, Bucharest: Economica Publishing House;

Matei, Lucica, 2006, The Romanian Public Administration facing the Challenges of Integration into the European Union, p. 13, http://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/20024/1/MPRA_paper_20024.pdf;

Matei, Lucica. 2004. Strategii de dezvoltare economică locală. Abordare managerială, Bucureşti: Politeia- SNSPA;

Meuwese, Anne Claartje Margreet. 2008. Impact Assessment in EU lawmaking, Netherlands: Kluwer Law International;

Mishan, Edward, and Euston, Quah. 2007. Cost–Benefit Analysis, a 5-a ediţie, London: Routledge;

OECD. 2008. Building an Institutional Framework for Regulatory Impact Analysis (RIA): Guidance for Policy Makers, Regulatory Policy Division Directorate for Public Governance and Territorial Development, available online on the website http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/44/15/40984990.pdf;

OECD. 2001. Improving Policy Instruments through Impact Assessment, Sigma Papers, no. 31, OECD Publishing, doi: 10.1787/5kml60vnhc6h-en;

Radaelli, Claudio, Bruno, Dente, Jacobs, Scott, Colin, Kirkpatrick, Anne, Meuwese, and Andrea, Renda. 2006. ENBR Handbook „How to perform the DIADEM data collection” www.enbr.org;

Renda, Andrea. 2006. Impact Assessment in the EU- The State of the Art and the Art of the State, Centre for European Policy Studies, Brussels;

Staronova, Katarina. 2007. Mapping of ex-ante Policy Impact Assessment Experiences and Tools in Europe. Resource Book for Practitioners, Bratislava: UNDP/BRC;

The strategy for accelerating public administration reform (2001 - 2004), available online at the website: http://www.gov.ro/upload/articles/100008/reforma-admin-public.pdf, completed by strategy for a better regulation at central level (2008 - 2013) available online at the website: http://www.sgg.ro/docs/File/UPP/doc/proiecte_finale/Strategia_BR_varianta_finala_aprobata_de_Guvern.p df, accessed on 29 March 2011;

Law regarding the national education, republished in Official Journal of Romania no 18/ 10.01.2011;

Law no. 24/2000, regarding the legislative technique for elaborating the legal acts, republished in O.J. of Romania no. 390/9. 06. 2009;

Law no. 315/2004, regarding the regional development in Romania;

Ulrich, Werner. 2002. Public Policy Analysis, in The Informed Student Guide to Management Science, edited by Daellenbach, Hans, and Robert Flood, great Britain: Ed. Thomson Learning, pp. 213-215;

Zomorrodian, Asghar, and Lucica, Matei. 2010. Program Evaluation: Its Significance and Priority for Shaping and Modification of Public Policies: A Comparative Analysis, Proceedings of ASBBS, vol. 17, no. 1 available online at the website http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers. cfm?abstract_id=1715642;

http://europeandcis.undp.org/pia/show/D598A880-F203-1EE9-B2CB788F94470CC4;

http://www.sgg.ro/index.php?politici_publice_upp;

http://ageconsearch.umn.edu/bitstream/17815/1/ar730131.pdf;

http://www.mcsi.ro/Minister/Despre-MCSI/Unitatea-de-Politici-Publice/Cadrul-juridic/HG-nr-870_2006;

http://www.sgg.ro/docs/File/UPP/doc/manual%20pentru%20evaluarea%20exante%20a%20impactului%20 politicilor%20educationale.pdf.