Wages & income mobility in Indian labour market: the post-reform scenario

Ray, Jhilam and Majumder, Rajarshi (2012): Wages & income mobility in Indian labour market: the post-reform scenario.

Abstract

Improvement in the living conditions of workers is an important objective of development planners and India is no exception. The crux of this lies in returns from work, or wage level. While non-wage aspects are important, wage level is the most pertinent indicator of condition of workers and increase in real wage level signals improvement in condition of labour market. Though most studies compare wages at different points of time from cross-sectional data, they provide an aggregative view without control for variables that are particular to the household/family. Contrary to this, intergenerational mobility in wage income following life cycle theory observes direction & quantum of movement of workers’ wage relative to their parents, therefore filtering out household characteristics, and providing better measure of workers’ conditions and its trends over time. Another important aspect that can be explored by looking at intergenerational wage mobility is related to the issue of equality. Stickiness of wage income with respect to parental income leads to persistence of income inequality across generations and questions the notional objective of equity in opportunity and openness of any society. Historically some groups are belonging to lower strata of society due to economic and or social discrimination leading to lower income and asset possession as well as capability formation which excluded them from the process of capability formation and income-earning. This exclusion and backwardness surpass the boundary of the current generation and spills over to successive generations as well. As a result Intergenerational Mobility is very low among backward classes. Also of importance is to enquire whether economic liberalization and structural reforms have had any impact on the intergenerational income mobility – has mobility today more than that in the 1990s? In this paper we explore these issues, throwing light on a hitherto neglected area of research in Indian labour market studies – intergenerational income mobility, desegregated across social classes and comparing pre-reform and post-reform results. We observe that wage income mobility between generations have been generally low in India. Though such stickiness over generations is declining over time, especially in the post-reform period, stickiness is still higher for excluded social classes. Improvement over the last decade has occurred mainly for the scheduled castes and not for the tribals who are much more spatially isolated and hence outside the orbit of economic dynamics.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: Intergenerational Mobility; wage; social class; income persistence, India
• Subjects: J - Labor and Demographic Economics > J6 - Mobility, Unemployment, Vacancies, and Immigrant Workers > J62 - Job, Occupational, and Intergenerational Mobility; J - Labor and Demographic Economics > J3 - Wages, Compensation, and Labor Costs > J31 - Wage Level and Structure ; Wage Differentials

References

Becker, G.S. and N. Tomes (1979), “An Equilibrium Theory of the Distribution of Income and Intergenerational Mobility.” Journal of Political Economy, 87(6), 1153-1189. Becker,

G.S. and N. Tomes (1986), “Human Capital and the Rise and Fall of Families.” Journal of Labor Economics, 4, S1-S39. Bjorklund,

A. and M. Jantti (2000), “Intergenerational Mobility of Socio-economic Status in Comparative Perspective.” Nordic Journal of Political Economy, 26(1), 3-33.

Black, Sandra E., Devereux, Paul J., and Salvanes, Kjell G., (2003), “Why the Apple Doesn’t Fall Far: Understanding Intergenerational Transmission of Human Capital,” IZA Discussion Paper No. 926, November 2003.

Bowles, Samuel and Herbert Gintis (2002) – “The Inheritance of Inequality”, The Journal of Economic Perspectives, Vol. 16, No. 3 (Summer, 2002), pp. 3-30.

Corak, Miles (ed). (2004) : Generational Income Mobility in North America and Europe, Book published by Cambridge University Press ISBN 0 521 82760 4

Driver, Edwin D. (1962) – “Caste and Occupational Structure in Central India”, Social Forces, Vol. 41, No. 1 (Oct., 1962), pp. 26-31

Erikson, R. and J.H. Goldthorpe (1992), The Constant Flux: A Study of Class Mobility in Industrial Societies, Oxford: Clarendon Press.

Erikson, R. and J.H. Goldthorpe (2002), “Intergenerational Inequality: A Sociological Perspective”, The Journal of Economic Perspectives, Vol. 16, No. 3 (Summer, 2002), pp. 31-44.

Gang, Ira N. & Zimmermann, Klaus F., (1999), “Is Child like Parent? Educational Attainment and Ethnic Origin”, IZA Discussion Papers No. 57, 1999

Mazumder, B. (2001), “Earnings Mobility in the US: A New Look at Intergenerational Inequality.” Center for Labor Research, University of California, Berkeley, Working Paper No. 34, March.

Ray, Jhilam and Majumder, Rajarshi (2010), “Educational and occupational mobility across generations in india: social and regional dimensions” . The Indian Journal of Labour Economics, Vol. 53, No. 4, 2010

Solon, G.R. (1992), “Intergenerational Income Mobility in the United States.” American Economic Review, 82(3), 393-408.

Solon, G.R. (1999), “Intergenerational Mobility in the Labour Market”, in Orley C. Ashenfelter and Devid Card, Eds., Handbook of Labour Economics, Vol 3A. Amsterdam: North Holland, 1999,pp 1761-1800

Solon, G.R. Lee, Chul-In ( 2006) : “Trends in Intergenerational Income Mobility”.,NBER working Paper, http:/www.nber.org/papers/ w12007.

Srinivasan, K., and Kumar, Sanjay. “Economic and Caste Criteria in Definition of Backwardness.” Economic and Political Weekly, 34 (16 October 1999): 3052-3057.

Takahiro Ito. 2007. “Caste Discrimination and Transaction Costs in the Labor Market: Evidence from Rural North India”, Discussion Paper Series No.200, Institute of Economic Research, Hitotsubashi University, Japan

Vaid, Divya.(2007) “ Caste and Class in India – An Analysis” Paper for CIQLE Workshop, Sept. 2007

World Bank (2000), “World Development Report 2000-2001: Attacking Poverty”, World Bank.