Modal verbs and politeness strategies in political discourse

Boicu, Ruxandra (2007): Modal verbs and politeness strategies in political discourse. Published in: Analele Universităţii din Bucureşti (Limbi şi literaturi străine) , Vol. LVII, No. 1/2008 (2008): pp. 15-28.

Abstract

ABSTRACT

This research consists in the analysis of one of Ashley Mote’s political speeches, from the point of view of the speaker’s use of the modal verbs that contribute to the mitigation or the aggravation of the illocutionary forces released by the speech acts they belong to. The analysis focuses on the two main semantic values of modal verbs in English, the epistemic and the deontic. Mote’s discursive strategies are mainly underlain by directive speech acts, due to their ”competitive” character (Leech 1983), while ”convivial” acts (commissive and expressive) are not manifest in his speech. According to Searle, commissive acts can be successful only if the speaker meets the preliminary condition of credibility. The politician’s independent status does not enable him to perform successful commissive acts. In exchange, in his speech all the directive acts that contain modal verbs are potential face-threatening acts. By their intrinsic meaning, modal verbs attenuate the illocutionary force of the directive speech acts in both ways. Due to context, their pragmatic meaning either mitigates this force through positive or negative politeness (Brown and Levinson 1987) or aggravates it using the same resources. The same speech act may mitigate and so protect Mote’s political allies faces, while aggravating and so damaging his political opponents’ faces. There is an interesting control of the modals meaning gradation, in the analyzed text.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: Keywords: modality, deontic, epistemic, mitigation, aggravation
• Subjects: A - General Economics and Teaching > A1 - General Economics > A12 - Relation of Economics to Other Disciplines; A - General Economics and Teaching > A1 - General Economics > A13 - Relation of Economics to Social Values; F - International Economics > F6 - Economic Impacts of Globalization; F - International Economics > F6 - Economic Impacts of Globalization > F64 - Environment; F - International Economics > F6 - Economic Impacts of Globalization > F66 - Labor; J - Labor and Demographic Economics > J6 - Mobility, Unemployment, Vacancies, and Immigrant Workers; J - Labor and Demographic Economics > J6 - Mobility, Unemployment, Vacancies, and Immigrant Workers > J61 - Geographic Labor Mobility ; Immigrant Workers; J - Labor and Demographic Economics > J7 - Labor Discrimination; J - Labor and Demographic Economics > J7 - Labor Discrimination > J71 - Discrimination

References

BIBLIOGRAPHICAL REFERENCES

Bally, Charles, 1932, Linguistique générale et linguistique française, Paris, Leroux.

Brown, Penelope, Levinson, Stephen C., 1987, Politeness: Some Universals in Language,Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.

Culioli, A, 1979, « Valeurs modales et opérations énonciatives » in Modèles linguistiques, Lille,Tome1, Fasc. 2, P.U. Lille, pp. 39-59.

Ducrot, Oswald, 1993, "À quoi sert le concept de modalité ?". In N. Dittmar & A. Reich (eds.). Modalité et acquisition des Langues, Berlin, Walter de Gruyter, pp. 11-129.

Groefsema, M., C.J. Fox and N. Obeid, 1991 “Can, May, Must and Should: A division of Labour”, in LAGB, Somerville College, Oxford.

Halliday, M.A.K.,1970, “Functional diversity in language as seen from a consideration of modality and mood in English”. Foundations of Language 6 (3).

Palmer, F.R., 1979, Modality and the English Modals, London and New York, Longman.

Perkins, Michael, R., 1983, Modal Expressions in English, London, Frances Pinter.

Von Wright, E.H., 1951, An Essay in Modal Logic, Amsterdam, North Holland.

Walton, A., 1988, The Pragnmtics of English Modal Verbs, PhD. Dissertation, University of London.

BIBLIOGRAPHY

Benveniste, Émile, 1969, Problèmes de linguistique générale, Paris, Gallimard.

Benveniste, Émile, 2001, « L’appareil formel de l’énonciation » in Vlad Alexandrescu (ed.), Pragmatique et théorie de l’énonciation : choix de textes, Bucureşti, Editura Universităţii din Bucureşti.

Bidu-Vrânceanu, A., et al., 2001, Dicţionar general de ştiinţe ale limbii, Bucureşti, Ed.Ştiinţifică.

Chilton, Paul, Christina Schäffner, 2005, “Discurso y politica” in T. A. van Dijk (ed.). El discurso como interacción social. Estudios sobre el discurso, Barcelona, Gedisa, pp. 206-235.

Cristea, Teodora, 1982, “Les modalités en français contemporain” in De la linguistique à la didactique, Bucureşti : T.U.B, pp. 98-113.

Cruse, Alan, 2000, Meaning in Language: An Introduction to Semantics and Pragmatics,London, Oxford University Press.

Ducrot, O., & Schaeffer, 1969, Noul dicţionar enciclopedic al ştiinţelor limbajului, Bucureşti,Edit. Babel.

Fairclough, Norman, 2001, Language and Power, London, Longman.

García-Pastor, M. D., 2001, Pragmatics and the 2000 US Elections, Valencia, University of Valencia, SellMonographs 10.

Goffman, Erving, 1974, Les rites d’interaction, Paris, Minuit.

Ghiglione, Rodolphe, 1994, « Paroles de meeting » in A. Trognon, J. Larrue (eds.), Pragmatique du discours politique, Paris, Armand Colin.

Gosselin, Laurent, 2005, Temporalité et modalité, Bruxelles, Editions Duculot.

Halliday, M.A.K., 1994, An Introduction to Functional Grammar (SecondEdition), London,Edward Arnold.

Halliday, M.A.K., 2005, Studies in English Language, London, NY, Continuum.

Hoffman, Th. R., 1993, Realms of Meaning, New York, Longman.

Ionescu-Ruxăndoiu, Liliana, 2003, Limbaj şi comunicare, Bucureşti, Ed. All.

Kerbrat-Orecchioni, Catherine, 1988, Echanges sur la conversation, Paris, Editions du CNRS.

Kerbrat-Orecchioni, Catherine ; 1980, L’énonciation. De la subjectivité dans le langage, Paris,Armand Colin.

Kerbrat-Orecchioni, Catherine ; 1992, Les intéractions verbales, Paris, Armand Colin.

Leech, Geoffrey, N., 1987, Meaning and the English Verb, London and New York, Longman.

Leech, Geoffrey, N., 1983, Principles of Pragmatics, London and New York, Longman.

Lyons, John, 1977, Semantics 2, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.

Lyons, John, 1995, Introducere în lingvistica teoretică, Bucureşti : Ed. Ştiinţifică.

Palmer, F. R., 2001, Mood and Modality, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.

Tuţescu, Mariana, 2005, L'auxiliation de modalité : dix auxi-verbes modaux, Bucureşti,Editura Universităţii din Bucureşti.

Valor, Luïsa Gea, 2000, A Pragmatic Approach to Politeness and Modality in the Book Review Articles, Valencia , Sell Monographs 6, Universidad de Valencia.

Van Dijk, Teun, A.,1977, Text and Context: Explorations in the Semantics and Pragmatics of Discourse, London, New York, Longman.

Van Dijk, Teun A., 2000, Ideology: A Multidisciplinary Approach, London, Sage.

Vion, Robert., 2004, ”Modalités, modalisations et discours représentés”, Langages 156, pp.396-409.

X x x 2005, Gramatica limbii române, Bucureşti, Editura Academiei