Hännikäinen, Jari (2014): Multi-step forecasting in the presence of breaks.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_55816.pdf Download (447kB) | Preview |
Abstract
This paper analyzes the relative performance of multi-step forecasting methods in the presence of breaks and data revisions. Our Monte Carlo simulations indicate that the type and the timing of the break affect the relative accuracy of the methods. The iterated method typically performs the best in unstable environments, especially if the parameters are subject to small breaks. This result holds regardless of whether data revisions add news or reduce noise. Empirical analysis of real-time U.S. output and inflation series shows that the alternative multi-step methods only episodically improve upon the iterated method.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Multi-step forecasting in the presence of breaks |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | structural breaks, multi-step forecasting, intercept correction, real-time data |
Subjects: | C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C2 - Single Equation Models ; Single Variables > C22 - Time-Series Models ; Dynamic Quantile Regressions ; Dynamic Treatment Effect Models ; Diffusion Processes C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C5 - Econometric Modeling > C53 - Forecasting and Prediction Methods ; Simulation Methods C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C8 - Data Collection and Data Estimation Methodology ; Computer Programs > C82 - Methodology for Collecting, Estimating, and Organizing Macroeconomic Data ; Data Access |
Item ID: | 55816 |
Depositing User: | Dr. Jari Hännikäinen |
Date Deposited: | 08 May 2014 13:43 |
Last Modified: | 09 Oct 2019 14:42 |
References: | Aruoba SB. 2008. Data revisions are not well-behaved. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking 40: 319–340. Bao Y. 2007. Finite-sample properties of forecasts from the stationary first-order autoregressive model under a general error distribution. Econometric Theory 23: 767–773. Brown BW, Mariano RS. 1989. Measures of deterministic prediction bias in nonlinear models. International Economic Review 30: 667–684. Chevillon G, Hendry DF. 2005. Non-parametric direct multi-step estimation for forecasting economic processes. International Journal of Forecasting 21: 201–218. Clements MP, Galvao AB. 2013. Real-time forecasting of inflation and output growth with autoregressive models in the presence of data revisions. Journal of Applied Econometrics 28: 458–477. Clements MP, Hendry DF. 1996a. Intercept corrections and structural change. Journal of Applied Econometrics 11: 475–494. Clements MP, Hendry DF. 1996b. Multi-step estimation for forecasting. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics 58: 657–684. Clements MP, Hendry DF. 1998. Forecasting Economic Time Series. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK. Clements MP, Hendry DF. 2006. Forecasting with breaks. In Handbook of Economic Forecasting, Vol. 1., Elliott G, Granger CWJ, Timmermann A (eds). Elsevier: Amsterdam; 605–657. Croushore D. 2011. Frontiers of real-time data analysis. Journal of Economic Literature 49: 72–100. Eklund J, Kapetanios G, Price S. 2013. Robust forecast methods and monitoring during structural change. Manchester School 81: 3–27. Elliott G, Timmermann A. 2008. Economic forecasting. Journal of Economic Literature 46: 3–56. Findley DF. 1985. Model selection for multi-step-ahead forecasting. In Proceedings of the Seventh Symposium on Identification and System Parameter Estimation, Baker HA, Young PC (eds). Pergamon: Oxford; 1039–1044. Giacomini R, Rossi B. 2010. Forecast comparisons in unstable environments. Journal of Applied Econometrics 25: 595–620. Giacomini R, White H. 2006. Tests of conditional predictive ability. Econometrica 74: 1545–1578. Hoque A, Magnus JR, Pesaran B. 1988. The exact multi-period mean square forecast error for the first-order autoregressive model. Journal of Econometrics 39: 327–346. Hännikäinen J. 2014. Selection of an estimation window in the presence of data revisions and recent structural breaks. Tampere Economic Working Paper, No. 92, University of Tampere. Downloadable at http://tampub.uta.fi/handle/10024/94782 Ing C-K. 2003. Multistep prediction in autoregressive processes. Econometric Theory 19: 254–279. Jacobs JPAM, van Norden S. 2011. Modeling data revisions: measurement error and dynamics of “true” values. Journal of Econometrics 161: 101–109. Mankiw NG, Shapiro MD. 1986. News or noise: an analysis of GNP revisions. Survey of Current Business 66: 20–25. Marcellino M, Stock JH, Watson MW. 2006. A comparison of direct and iterated multistep AR methods for forecasting macroeconomic time series. Journal of Econometrics 135: 499–526. McConnell MM, Perez-Quiros G. 2000. Output fluctuations in the United States: what has changed since the early 1980’s? American Economic Review 90: 1464–1476. Pesaran HM, Pick A, Timmermann A. 2011. Variable selection, estimation and inference for multi-period forecasting problems. Journal of Econometrics 164: 173–187. Pesaran MH, Timmermann A. 2005. Small sample properties of forecasts from autoregressive models under structural breaks. Journal of Econometrics 129: 183–217. Rossi B. 2013. Advances in forecasting under instability. In Handbook of Economic Forecasting, Vol. 2., Elliott G, Timmermann A (eds). Elsevier: Amsterdam; 1203–1324. Schorfheide F. 2005. VAR forecasting under misspecification. Journal of Econometrics 128: 99–136. Sims CA, Zha T. 2006. Were there regime switches in U.S. monetary policy? American Economic Review 96: 54–81. Stock JH, Watson MW. 1996. Evidence on structural instability in macroeconomic time series relations. Journal of Business and Economic Statistics 14: 11–30. Stock JH, Watson MW. 2003. Forecasting output and inflation: the role of asset prices. Journal of Economic Literature 41: 788–829. Weiss AA. 1991. Multi-step estimation and forecasting in dynamic models. Journal of Econometrics 48: 135–149. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/55816 |