Куда идти: двадцать четыре тезиса

Polterovich, Victor (2014): Куда идти: двадцать четыре тезиса. Published in: ACTUAL PROBLEMS OF ECONOMICS , Vol. 66, No. 3 (23 October 2014): pp. 7-16.

Abstract

Abstract The article deals with the basic elements of a rational strategy of economic development of Russia in the modern circumstances. The analysis shows that the current state of confrontation between Russia and the United States will last long enough. Trying to shorten the period of forced partial isolation, Russia should use it to restore growth and to prepare for further integration with Europe. We need to debug the credit system, to complete the creation of the NIS, as well as systems of indicative planning and continuing education, and to improve the administration in accordance with the principles of the theory of "developmental state." Implementing import substitution, we should seek to production diversification, based on the expansion of domestic consumption of goods produced from natural resources. It is necessary to ensure the dissemination of the technologies available at leading Russian companies in the whole country, and accelerate the transition to innovative development. To solve these problems, one needs a modern science sector, containing all the intermediate links between basic and applied research. Strengthening the rule of law, respect for the opposition, improving the investment climate - this strategy is the best response to foreign political pressure, the key to Russia's strategic security.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• English Title: Where to go: twenty four theses
• Language: Russian
• Keywords: middle income trap, national innovation system, indicative planning, integration, regional development agency, diversification, science sector, strategic security
• Subjects: D - Microeconomics > D0 - General > D02 - Institutions: Design, Formation, Operations, and Impact; H - Public Economics > H1 - Structure and Scope of Government > H11 - Structure, Scope, and Performance of Government; O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O4 - Economic Growth and Aggregate Productivity > O43 - Institutions and Growth; P - Economic Systems > P2 - Socialist Systems and Transitional Economies > P21 - Planning, Coordination, and Reform

References

Arnold E. et al.The Role of Industrial Research Institutes in the National Innovation System. VINNOVA - Swedish Governmental Agency for Innovation Systems. 2007.

Docquier F. and H. Rapoport. Globalization, Brain Drain, and Development. Journal of Economic Literature 2012, 50:3, 681–730.

Eichengreen B., D. Park, B. K. Shin. Growth Slowdowns Redux: New Evidence on the Middle-Income Trap. Working Paper 18673. National Bureau of Economic Research. Cambridge, MA, 2013.

Gill I. and H. Kharas. An East Asian renaissance : ideas for economic growth. The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development / The World Bank. Washington DC, 2007.

Johnson C. (1999). The Developmental State: Odyssey of a Concept. In: ≪The Developmental State≫. Woo-Cumings M. (ed.). Ithaca, N.Y.:Cornell University Press. P. 32–60.

Kharas H. and H. Kohli. What Is the Middle Income Trap, Why do Countries Fall into It, and How Can It Be Avoided? Global Journal of Emerging Market Economies, 2011, Vol.3, Issue 3, 281–289.

Voskoboynikov I. and L. Solanko. When high growth is not enough: Rethinking Russia’s pre-crisis economic performance. Bank of Finland, BOFIT, 2014

Zhang L. et al.The human capital roots of the middle income trap: the case of China. Agricultural Economics, 2013,Vol. 44, 151–162.

Бунин И. М. (ред.). Гражданское общество – ресурс развития России. Аналитический доклад. Центр политических технологий. М.: 2013.

Денисова И. А. Система подготовки кадров как звено модернизационной политики. В. кн. Полтерович В. М. (отв. ред.). Стратегия модернизации российской экономики. Санкт-Петербург.: Алитейя, 2010.

Доклад о состоянии гражданского общества в Российской Федерации за 2012 год. Общественная палата Российской Федерации. М.:2012

Б.В. Кузнецов (ред). Очерки модернизации российской промышленности. Поведение фирм. М.: Изд. дом ВШЭ, 2014.

Никитчанова Е. В., Ахмед И. И.,. Бекшоков А. А. Практика корпоративного управления в российских компаниях с госучастием: сильные и слабые стороны. Управленческие науки. №1(10).2014.

Овчарова, Л.Н. (рук. авт. колл.). Динамика монетарных и немонетарных характеристик уровня жизни российских домохозяйств за годы постсоветского развития : аналитический доклад. М : Фонд «Либеральная Миссия», 2014. — 108 с.

О реформе образования, ее итогах и перспективах. Заявление Ученого совета филологического факультета МГУ имени М. В. Ломоносова http://www.philol.msu.ru/pdfs/o-reforme-obrazovaniya_philol2012.pdf

Полтерович В. М. Промышленная политика: рецепты или институты? Журнал Новой экономической ассоциации, №2(22), 2014. С.190-195.

Полтерович В. М. Региональные институты модернизации. Экономическая наука современной России, 2011, № 4(55), 17-29.

Полтерович В. М. Реформа РАН: экспертный анализ. Общественные науки и современность. Общественные науки и современность. 2014. № 1. С. 5-28.

Полтерович В. М. Элементы теории реформ. М.: Экономика. С. 410-413

«Россия в цифрах», Росстат, выпуски 2008-2013гг. За пять лет число НКО выросло на 16%.