School Performance Evaluation under the Voucher System: the Case of Chile

Bronfman, Javier (2007): School Performance Evaluation under the Voucher System: the Case of Chile. Published in: The Wagner Review , Vol. XIV, No. 1 (2007): pp. 77-86.

Abstract

Education plays an important role in the economic and social development of countries. Myriad studies show that education is one of the best ways to offer increased socioeconomic opportunities, social mobility and wages. Not only is universal education important but more significant is the quality of the education. In an attempt to offer higher-quality educational options, Chile has introduced a voucher system. Vouchers are simply the induction of incentives as market forces into education to improve educational results. Introducing these incentives creates competition in student recruitment, directly influenced by the academic results of the school – ideally allowing only those institutions with good results to survive “in the market” and closing those schools that cannot “compete” against higher quality establishments. Unfortunately, sufficient data do not yet exist to fully endorse the claim that vouchers impact “the market” in this form. This study will use the empirical evidence that the Chilean case provides and try to determine if this voucher system works as the free-market theory claims.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: Education, Vouchers, Chile
• Subjects: I - Health, Education, and Welfare > I2 - Education and Research Institutions > I21 - Analysis of Education; I - Health, Education, and Welfare > I2 - Education and Research Institutions > I24 - Education and Inequality; I - Health, Education, and Welfare > I2 - Education and Research Institutions > I28 - Government Policy

References

Aedo, C. y O. Larrañaga (1994). “Sistemas de Entrega de los Servicios Sociales: LaExperiencia Chilena” en C. Aedo and O. Larrañaga (eds), Sistemas de Entrega de los Servicios Sociales: Una Agenda para la Reforma. Washington, DC:Interamerican Development Bank.

Angrist, J.D., y Imbens, G.W. (1995), “Two-Stage Least-squares Estimation of Average Causal Effects in Models with Variable Treatment Intensity”, Journal of the American Statistical Association, 90, 431-442.

Angrist, J.D., Imbens, G.W., y Rubin, D.B. (1996), “Identification of Causal Effects Using Instrumental Variables”, Journal of the American Statistical Association, 91, 444-455.

Angrist, J.D., y Krueger, A.B. (1991), “Does Compulsory School Attendance Affect Schooling and Earnings”, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 106, 979-1014.

Bravo, D. (1998). “Competition and Quality of Education: An Assessment of the Chilean Voucher System”. Draft. Department of Economics, Universidad de Chile. November.

Card, D. y A.Krueger (1992). “Does School Quality Matter? Returns to Education and the Characteristics of Public Schools in the United States”. Journal of Political Economy 100, February.

Card, D.E. (1995b) “Using geographic Variation in College Proximity to estimate The return to Schooling”, en Aspect of Labour Market Behaviour: Essays in Honor of John Vanderkamp, eds. L.S. Christofides et al. Toronto: University of Toronto Press. 201-221.

Card, D.E. (2000), “Estimating the return to Schooling: Progress on Some Persistent Econometric Problems”, NBER Working Paper 7769.

Carnoy, M. y P.McEwan (1998). “Is Private Education More Effective and Cost-Effective than Public?. The Case of Chile”. Draft. Stanford University.

Contreras, D. “Evaluating a Voucher system in Chile. Individual, Family and School Characteristics” Documento de trabajo Nº175, Marzo 2001. Departamento de Economía, Universidad de Chile.

Contreras, D. Arzola M. and Bronfman J. “Evaluación del impacto de las subvenciones en el desempeño educacional chileno” Seminario para optar al título de Ingeniero Comercial, 2001. Universidad de Chile.

Contreras, D. Macías V. “Desigualdad educacional en Chile geografía y dependencia”, Cuaderno de Economía, año 39, Nº118, pp 395-421, Diciembre 2001. Departamento de Economía, Universidad de Chile.

Contreras, D.et all “Monetary incentives for teachers and scholl performance: Evidence for Chile” March 2005,Departamento de Economía, Universidad de Chile.

Friedman, M. (1955). “The Role of Government in Education”. In R.A.Solo (ed), Economics and the Public Interest, New Brunswick, N.J., Rutgers University Press.

Friedman, M. (1962). “The Role of Government in Education”. in Milton Friedman, Capitalism and Freedom, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Hanushek, E. (1986). “The Economics of Schooling: Production and Efficiency in Public Schools”. Journal of Economic Literature 24, September.

Hanushek, E. (1996). “School Resources and Student Performance”. In G.Burtless (ed), Does Money Matter? the Effect of School Resources on Student Achievement and Adult Success, the Brookings Institution.

Heckman, J., A.Layne-Farrar y P.Todd (1996). “Does Measured School Quality Really Matter?. An Examination of the Earnings-Quality Relationship”. Working Paper, National Bureau of Economic Research.

Heckman, J.J., y Vytlacil, E.J. (1998) “Instrumental variables methods for the Correlated random Coefficient Model”, Journal of Human Resources, 33:4, 974-1002.

Hedges, L., R.Laine y R.Greenwald (1994). “Does Money Matter? A Meta-Analysis of Studies of the Effects of Differential School Inputs on Student Outcomes”. Educational Researcher 23, April.

Hedges, L. y R.Greenwald (1996). “Have Times Changed? the Relation between School Resources and Student Performance”. En G.Burtless (ed), Does Money Matter? the Effect of School Resources on Student Achievement and Adult Success, the Brookings Institution.

Mizala, A. y P.Romaguera (1998). “Desempeño escolar y elección de colegios: la experiencia chilena”. Center of Applied Economics, Universidad de Chile.

Núñez, I. et all. “Sistema educativo Nacional de Chile: 1993” Ministerio de Educación de Chile y Organización de Estados Iberoamericanos, Santiago, 1993.

Piñera, J (2000). “Un nuevo mundo educacional”.Opinión, Revista 123 Entel Año 5 Nº4.

Quintanilla, X. “Sistema de financiamiento compartido: Una evaluación de su funcionamiento y los efectos en el rendimiento educacional” Seminario de título año 2000, FACEA, Universidad de Chile.

Rodríguez, J. (1988), School achievement and decentralization policy: the Chilean case. Revista de Análisis Económico, 3, 1. ILADES.

Sanhueza, C. “Rendimiento educacional, desigualdad y brecha de desempeño publico privado” Seminario de título año 1999, FACEA, Universidad de Chile.

Schiefelbein, E. (1992). “Análisis del SIMCE y sugerencias para mejorar su impacto en la calidad”. En S.Gómez (ed), La realidad en cifras. Estadísticas Sociales. Flacso/INE.

West, E. (1997). “Education Vouchers in Principle and Practice: A Survey”. The World Bank Research Observer, Vol.12.

Witte, J. (1996). “School Choice and Student Performance”. En H.Ladd (ed), Holding Schools Accountable. Performance-Based Reform in Education. The Brookings Institution, Washington. g Paper N°4978. National Bureau of Economic Research.