What Makes People Go to War? Defensive Intentions Motivate Retaliatory and Preemptive Intergroup Aggression

Böhm, Robert and Rusch, Hannes and Gürerk, Özgür (2015): What Makes People Go to War? Defensive Intentions Motivate Retaliatory and Preemptive Intergroup Aggression.

Abstract

Although humans qualify as one of the most cooperative animal species, the scale of violent intergroup conflict among them is unparalleled. Explanations of the underlying motivation to participate in an intergroup conflict, however, remain unsatisfactory. While previous research shows that intergroup conflict increases ‘in-group love’, it fails to identify robust triggers of ‘out-group hate’. Here, we present a controlled laboratory experiment, which demonstrates that ‘out-group hate’ can be provoked systematically. We find direct and causal evidence that the intention to protect the in-group is not only a crucial motivator of ‘out-group hate’ in defensive reactions, but also promotes preemptive offensive actions against out-group threat. Hence, the strength of ‘out-group hate’ depends on whether the own group is perceived to be on the offensive or the defensive side of the conflict. This finding improves our understanding of the escalation of intergroup conflicts and may have important implications for their prevention, as we find in our experiment that removing out-group threat substantially reduces intergroup aggression, leading to full peace.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: intergroup conflict; parochial altruism; in-group love; out-group hate; defense
• Subjects: B - History of Economic Thought, Methodology, and Heterodox Approaches > B5 - Current Heterodox Approaches > B52 - Institutional ; Evolutionary; C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C9 - Design of Experiments > C92 - Laboratory, Group Behavior; N - Economic History > N4 - Government, War, Law, International Relations, and Regulation > N40 - General, International, or Comparative

References

Abbink, K., & de Haan, T. (2014). Trust on the brink of Armageddon: The first-strike game. European Economic Review, 67, 190–196. doi:10.1016/j.euroecorev.2014.01.009

Bar-Tal, D. (2000). Shared beliefs in a society: Social psychological analysis. Sage Publications.

Bernhard, H., Fischbacher, U., & Fehr, E. (2006). Parochial altruism in humans. Nature, 442, 912–915. doi:10.1038/nature04981

Böhm, R., & Rockenbach, B. (2013). The inter-group comparison-intra-group cooperation hypothesis: comparisons between groups increase efficiency in public goods provision. PloS ONE, 8(2), e56152. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0056152

Bornstein, G. (1992). The free-rider problem in intergroup conflicts over step-level and continuous public goods. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 62(4), 597–606.

Bornstein, G. (2003). Intergroup Conflict: Individual, Group, and Collective Interests. Personality & Social Psychology Review (Lawrence Erlbaum Associates), 7(2), 129–145. doi:Article

Bornstein, G., & Ben-Yossef, M. (1994). Cooperation in intergroup and single-group social dilemmas. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 30(1), 52–67.

Brewer, M. B. (2007). The importance of being we: Human nature and intergroup relations. American Psychologist, 62(8), 728–738. doi:doi:10.1037/0003-066X.62.8.728

Burke, B. L., Martens, A., & Faucher, E. H. (2010). Two decades of terror management theory: a meta-analysis of mortality salience research. Personality and Social Psychology Review : An Official Journal of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc, 14(2), 155–95. doi:10.1177/1088868309352321

Burton-Chellew, M. N., Ross-Gillespie, A., & West, S. A. (2010). Cooperation in humans: competition between groups and proximate emotions. Evolution and Human Behavior, 31(2), 104–108. doi:10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2009.07.005

Burton-Chellew, M. N., & West, S. A. (2012). Pseudocompetition among groups increases human cooperation in a public-goods game. Animal Behaviour, 84(4), 947–952. doi:10.1016/j.anbehav.2012.07.019

Choi, J.-K., & Bowles, S. (2007). The coevolution of parochial altruism and war. Science, 318(5850), 636–40. doi:10.1126/science.1144237

Clausewitz, C. von. (1832). Vom Kriege (1st ed.). Hinterlassene Werke.

Crofoot, M. C., & Gilby, I. C. (2012). Cheating monkeys undermine group strength in enemy territory. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 109(2), 501–5. doi:10.1073/pnas.1115937109

De Dreu, C. K. W., Greer, L. L., Handgraaf, M. J. J., Shalvi, S., Van Kleef, G. A., Baas, M., … Feith, S. W. W. (2010). The neuropeptide oxytocin regulates parochial altruism in intergroup conflict among humans. Science, 328(5984), 1408–1411.

Fischbacher, U. (2007). z-Tree: Zurich toolbox for ready-made economic experiments. Experimental Economics, 10(2), 171–178. doi:10.1007/s10683-006-9159-4

Fry, D. P., & Söderberg, P. (2013). Lethal aggression in mobile forager bands and implications for the origins of war. Science, 341(6143), 270–3. doi:10.1126/science.1235675

Gat, A. (2009). So Why Do People Fight? Evolutionary Theory and the Causes of War. European Journal of International Relations, 15(4), 571–599. doi:10.1177/1354066109344661

Glowacki, L., & Wrangham, R. W. (2013). The role of rewards in motivating participation in simple warfare. Human Nature, 24(4), 444–60. doi:10.1007/s12110-013-9178-8

Greiner, B. (2004). An online recruitment system for economic experiments. In K. Kremer & V. Macho (Eds.), Forschung und wissenschaftliches Rechnen 2003 (GWDG Beric., pp. 79–93). Göttingen: Gesellschaft für Wissenschaftliche Datenverarbeitung.

Halevy, N., Bornstein, G., & Sagiv, L. (2008). “In-group love” and “out-group hate” as motives for individual participation in intergroup conflict: A new game paradigm. Psychological Science, 19(4), 405–411.

Halevy, N., Weisel, O., & Bornstein, G. (2012). “In-Group Love” and “Out-Group Hate” in Repeated Interaction Between Groups. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 25(2), 188–195. doi:10.1002/bdm.726

Jonas, E., & Fritsche, I. (2013). Destined to die but not to wage war: How existential threat can contribute to escalation or de-escalation of violent intergroup conflict. American Psychologist, 68(7), 543–558.

Keeley, L. H. (1997). War before civilization: The myth of the peaceful savage. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

Kelly, R. C. (2005). The evolution of lethal intergroup violence. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 102(43), 15294–8. doi:10.1073/pnas.0505955102

Kitchen, D., & Beehner, J. (2007). Factors affecting individual participation in group-level aggression among non-human primates. Behaviour, 144(12), 1551–1581. doi:10.1163/156853907782512074

Kosterman, R., & Feshbach, S. (1989). Toward a measure of patriotic and nationalistic attitudes. Political Psychology, 10(2), 257–274.

Leibbrandt, A., & Sääksvuori, L. (2012). Communication in intergroup conflicts. European Economic Review, 56(6), 1136–1147. doi:10.1016/j.euroecorev.2012.05.003

Levy, J. S. (2011). Declining Power and the Preventive Motivation for War. World Politics, 40(01), 82–107. doi:10.2307/2010195

Mackie, D. M., Devos, T., & Smith, E. R. (2000). Intergroup emotions: Explaining offensive action tendencies in an intergroup context. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79(4), 606–616.

McDonald, M. M., Navarrete, C. D., & Van Vugt, M. (2012). Evolution and the psychology of intergroup conflict: the male warrior hypothesis. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences, 367(1589), 670–9. doi:10.1098/rstb.2011.0301

Puurtinen, M., Heap, S., & Mappes, T. (2014). The joint emergence of group competition and within-group cooperation. Evolution and Human Behavior. doi:10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2014.11.005

Rusch, H. (2013). Asymmetries in altruistic behavior during violent intergroup conflict. Evolutionary Psychology, 11(5), 973–993.

Rusch, H. (2014a). The evolutionary interplay of intergroup conflict and altruism in humans: A review of parochial altruism theory and prospects for its extension. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 281(1794), 20141539–20141539. doi:10.1098/rspb.2014.1539

Rusch, H. (2014b). The two sides of warfare : An extended model of altruistic behavior in ancestral human intergroup conflict. Human Nature, 25(3), 359–77. doi:10.1007/s12110-014-9199-y

Rusch, H., Leunissen, J. M., & van Vugt, M. (2015). Historical and experimental evidence of sexual selection for war heroism. Evolution and Human Behavior. doi:10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2015.02.005

Selten, R. (1967). Die Strategiemethode zur Erforschung des eingeschränkt rationalen Verhaltens im Rahmen eines Oligopolexperiment. In H. Sauermann (Ed.), (pp. 136–168). Tübingen: J. C. B. Mohr (Paul Siebeck).

Simunovic, D., Mifune, N., & Yamagishi, T. (2013). Preemptive strike: An experimental study of fear-based aggression. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 49(6), 1120–1123. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2013.08.003

Stephan, W. G., & Stephan, C. W. (2000). An integrated threat theory of prejudice. In S. Oskamp (Ed.), Reducing prejudice and discrimination (pp. 23–45). Mahwah, NJ US: Erlbaum Associates.

Struch, N., & Schwartz, S. H. (1989). Intergroup aggression: Its predictors and distinctness from in-group bias. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56, 364–373.

Weisel, O., & Böhm, R. (n.d.). “Ingroup love” and “outgroup hate” in intergroup conflict between natural groups. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology.