Chau, Tak Wai (2015): Identification through Heteroscedasticity: What If We Have the Wrong Form of Heteroscedasticity?
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_65888.pdf Download (2MB) | Preview |
Abstract
Abstract Klein and Vella (2010) and Lewbel (2012) respectively propose estimators that utilize the heteroscedasticity of the error terms to identify the coefficient of the endogenous regressor in a standard linear model, even when there are no exogenous excluded instruments. The assumptions on the form of heteroscedasticity are different for these two estimators, and whether they are robust to misspecification is an important issue because it is not straightforward how to justify which form of heteroscedasticity is true. This paper presents some simulation results for the finite-sample performance of the two estimators under various forms of heteroscedasticity. The results reveal that both estimators can be substantially biased when the form of heteroscedasticity is of the wrong type, meaning that they lack robustness to misspecification of the form of heteroscedasticity. Moreover, the J statistics of the over-identification test for the Lewbel (2012) estimator has low power under the wrong form of heteroscedasticity in the cases considered. The results suggest that it is not enough for researchers to justify only the existence of heteroscedasticity when using the proposed estimators.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Identification through Heteroscedasticity: What If We Have the Wrong Form of Heteroscedasticity? |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | Instrumental Variable Estimation, Endogeneity, Heteroscedasticity |
Subjects: | C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C1 - Econometric and Statistical Methods and Methodology: General > C13 - Estimation: General C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C3 - Multiple or Simultaneous Equation Models ; Multiple Variables > C31 - Cross-Sectional Models ; Spatial Models ; Treatment Effect Models ; Quantile Regressions ; Social Interaction Models C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C3 - Multiple or Simultaneous Equation Models ; Multiple Variables > C36 - Instrumental Variables (IV) Estimation |
Item ID: | 65888 |
Depositing User: | Tak Wai Chau |
Date Deposited: | 02 Aug 2015 16:12 |
Last Modified: | 27 Sep 2019 06:40 |
References: | Banks, J., Blundell, R., and Lewbel, A. (1997), “Quadratic Engel Curves and Consumer Demand,” Review of Economics and Statistics, 79, 527– 539. Baum, C.F and Schaffer, M. E., (2012) "IVREG2H: Stata module to perform instrumental variables estimation using heteroskedasticity-based instruments," Statistical Software Components S457555, Boston College Department of Economics, revised 02 Apr 2015. Baum, B.F. (2013) "Implementing new econometric tools in Stata," Mexican Stata Users' Group Meetings 2013-09, Stata Users Group. Breusch, T. and Pagan A. (1979) “A Simple Test for Heteroscedasticity and Random Coefficient Variation,” Econometrica, 47, 1287-1294. Chowdhury, M., Bhattacharya, P., Mallick D., and Ulubasoglu, M. (2014) “An Empirical Inquiry into the Role of Sectoral Diversification in Exchange Rate Regime Choice,” European Economic Review, 67, 210-227. Denny, K. and Oppedisano, V. (2013) “The Surprising Effect of Larger Class Sizes: Evidence Using Two Identification Strategies,” Labour Economics, 23, 57-65. Emran, M. and Hou, Z. (2013) “Access to Markets and Rural Poverty: Evidence From Household Consumption in China,” Review of Economics and Statistics, 95(2), 682-697. Emran, M. and Shilpi, S. (2012) “The Extent of the Market and Stages of Agricultural Specialization,” Canadian Journal of Economics, 12, 1125-1153. Farre, L. Klein, R. and Vella, F. (2013) “A parametric control function approach to estimating the returns to schooling in the absence of exclusion restrictions: an application to the NLSY,” Empirical Economics, 44, 111-133. Fernihough, A. (2014). “ivlewbel: Uses heteroscedasticity to estimate mismeasured and endogenous regressor models.” R package version 1.1. http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=ivlewbel Hansen, L (1982) “Large Sample Properties of Generalized Method of Moments Estimators,” Econometrica, 50,1029-1054. Klein, R. and Vella, F. (2009a) “A Semiparametric Model for Binary Response and Continuous Outcomes Under Index Heteroscedasticity,” Journal of Applied Econometrics, 24, 735-762. Klein, R. and Vella, F. (2009b) “Estimating the Return to Endogenous Schooling Decisions via Conditional Second Moments,” Journal of Human Resources, 44(4), 1047-1065. Klein, R. and Vella, F. (2010) “Estimating a class of triangular simultaneous equations models without exclusion restrictions,” Journal of Econometrics, 154, 154-164. Lewbel, A. (2012) “Using Heteroscedasticity to Identify and Estimate Mismeasured and Endogenous Regressor Models,” Journal of Business and Economic Statistics, 30(1), 67-80. Meghir, C., and Robin, J.-M. (1992), “Frequency of Purchase and the Estimation of Demand Systems,” Journal of Econometrics, 53, 53–86. Millimet, D. and Roy, J. (2015) “Empirical Tests of the Pollution Haven Hypothesis When Environmental Regulation is Endogenous,” Journal of Applied Econometrics, forthcoming. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/65888 |
Available Versions of this Item
- Identification through Heteroscedasticity: What If We Have the Wrong Form of Heteroscedasticity? (deposited 02 Aug 2015 16:12) [Currently Displayed]