Consumer Search and Retail Market Structure

Rhodes, Andrew and Zhou, Jidong (2016): Consumer Search and Retail Market Structure.

Abstract

This paper proposes a framework for studying how consumer search frictions affect retail market structure. In our model single-product firms which supply different products can merge to form a multiproduct firm. Consumers wish to buy multiple products and value the one-stop shopping convenience associated with a multiproduct firm. We find that when the search friction is relatively large all firms are multiproduct in equilibrium. However when the search friction is smaller the equilibrium market structure is asymmetric, with single-product and multiproduct firms coexisting. This asymmetric market structure often leads to the weakest price competition, and is the worst for consumers among all possible market structures. Due to the endogeneity of market structure, a reduction in the search friction can increase market prices and decrease consumer welfare.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: consumer search; conglomerate merger; multiproduct pricing; one-stop shopping; retail market structure
• Subjects: D - Microeconomics > D1 - Household Behavior and Family Economics > D11 - Consumer Economics: Theory; D - Microeconomics > D4 - Market Structure, Pricing, and Design > D43 - Oligopoly and Other Forms of Market Imperfection; D - Microeconomics > D8 - Information, Knowledge, and Uncertainty > D83 - Search ; Learning ; Information and Knowledge ; Communication ; Belief ; Unawareness; L - Industrial Organization > L1 - Market Structure, Firm Strategy, and Market Performance > L13 - Oligopoly and Other Imperfect Markets

References

Anderson, S., and R. Renault (1999): Pricing, Product Diversity, and Search Costs: A Bertrand-Chamberlin-Diamond Model, RAND Journal of Economics, 30(4), 719-735.

Armstrong, M., and J. Vickers (2010): Competitive Non-linear Pricing and Bundling, Review of Economic Studies, 77(1), 30-60.

Armstrong, M., J. Vickers, and J. Zhou (2009): Prominence and Consumer Search, RAND Journal of Economics, 40(2), 209-233.

Baughman, G., and K. Burdett (2015): Multiproduct Search Equilibrium, mimeo.

Baumol, W., and E. Ide (1956): Variety in Retailing, Management Science, 3(1), 93-101.

Baye, M., D. Kovenock, and C. de Vries (1992): It Takes Two to Tango: Equilibria in a Model of Sales, Games and Economic Behavior, 4(4), 493-510.

Burdett, K., and K. Judd (1983): Equilibrium Price Dispersion, Econometrica, 51(4), 955-969.

Champsaur, P., and J. Rochet (1989): Multiproduct Duopolists, Econometrica, 57(3), 533-557.

Chen, Z., and P. Rey (2012): Loss Leading as an Exploitative Practice, American Economic Review, 102(7), 3462-3482.

Chen, Z., and P. Rey (2015): A Theory of Conglomerate Mergers, manuscript from private communication.

Church, J. (2008): Conglomerate Mergers, in Issues in Competition Law and Policy, ed. by W. Collins. Chicago: American Bar Association.

Diamond, P. (1971): A Model of Price Adjustment, Journal of Economic Theory, 3(2), 156-168.

Dudey, M. (1990): Competition by Choice: The Effect of Consumer Search on Firm Location Decisions, American Economic Review, 80(5), 1092-1104.

Gilbert, R., and C. Matutes (1993): Product Line Rivalry with Brand Differentiation,Journal of Industrial Economics, 41(3), 223-240.

Johnson, J. (2014): Unplanned Purchases and Retail Competition, mimeo.

Kaplan, G., G. Menzio, L. Rudanko, and N. Trachter (2015): Relative Price Dispersion: Evidence and Theory, mimeo.

Klemperer, P. (1992): Equilibrium Product Lines: Competing Head-to-Head May Be Less Competitive, American Economic Review, 82(4), 740-755.

Lal, R., and C. Matutes (1989): Price Competition in Multimarket Duopolies, RAND Journal of Economics, 20(4), 516-537

Lal, R., and C. Matutes (1994): Retail Pricing and Advertising Strategies, Journal of Business, 67(3), 345-370.

Manez, J., and M. Waterson (2001): Multiproduct Firms and Product Differentiation: A Survey, mimeo.

McAfee, P. (1995): Multiproduct Equilibrium Price Dispersion, Journal of Economic Theory, 67(1), 83-105.

Messinger, P., and C. Narasimhan (1997): A Model of Retail Formats Based on Consumers Economizing on Shopping Time, Marketing Science, 16(1), 1-23.

Moraga-Gonzalez, J., and V. Petrikaite (2013): Search Costs, Demand-Side Economies, and the Incentives to Merge under Bertrand Competition, RAND Journal of Economics, 44(3), 391-424.

Nalebuff, B. (2000): Competing Against Bundles, in Incentives, Organization, and Public Economics, ed. by G. Myles, and P. Hammond. Oxford University Press.

Narasimhan, C. (1988): Competitive Promotional Strategies, Journal of Business, 61(4), 427-449.

Non, M. (2010): Isolation or Joining a Mall? On the Location Choice of Competing Shops, mimeo.

Rhodes, A. (2015): Multiproduct Retailing, Review of Economic Studies, 82(1), 360-390.

Seo, B. (2015): Firm Scope and the Value of One-Stop Shopping in Washington State's Deregulated Liquor Market, mimeo.

Shaked, A., and J. Sutton (1990): Multiproduct Firms and Market Structure, RAND Journal of Economics, 21(1), 45-62.

Shelegia, S. (2012): Multiproduct Pricing in Oligopoly, International Journal of Industrial Organization, 30(2), 231-242.

Stahl, D. (1989): Oligopolistic Pricing with Sequential Consumer Search, American Economic Review, 79(4), 700-712.

Stahl, K. (1982): Location and Spatial Pricing Theory with Nonconvex Transportation Cost Schedules,Bell Journal of Economics, 13(2), 575-582.

Thanassoulis, J. (2011): Is Multimedia Convergence To Be Welcome?, Journal of Industrial Economics, 59(2), 225-253.

Varian, H. (1980): A Model of Sales,American Economic Review, 70(4), 651-659.

Wilson, C. (2011): Ordered Search and Equilibrium Obfuscation, International Journal of Industrial Organization, 28(5), 496-506.

Wolinsky, A. (1983): Retail Trade Concentration due to Consumers' Imperfect Information, Bell Journal of Economics, 14(1), 275-282.

Wolinsky, A. (1986): True Monopolistic Competition as a Result of Imperfect Information, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 101(3), 493-511.

Zhou, J. (2014): Multiproduct Search and the Joint Search Effect, American Economic Review, 104(9), 2918-2939.