Müller, Tobias and Boes, Stefan (2016): Disability Insurance Benefits and Labor Supply Choices: Evidence from a Discontinuity in Benefit Awards.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_70957.pdf Download (739kB) | Preview |
Abstract
This paper explores the effects of disability insurance (DI) benefits on the labor market decision of existing DI beneficiaries using a fuzzy regression discontinuity (RD) design. We identify the effect of DI benefits on the decision of working full-time, part-time or staying out of the labor force by exploiting a discontinuity in the DI benefit award rate above the age of 55. Overall, our results suggest that the Swiss DI system creates substantial lock-in effects which heavily influence the labor supply decision of existing beneficiaries: the benefit receipt increases the probability of working part-time by about 41%-points, decreases the probability of working full-time by about 42%-points but has little or no effects on the probability of staying out of the labor force for the average beneficiary. Therefore, DI benefits induce a shift in the labor supply of existing beneficiaries in the sense that they reduce their work intensity from working full-time to part-time which adds a possible explanation for the low DI outflow observed all across the OECD.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Disability Insurance Benefits and Labor Supply Choices: Evidence from a Discontinuity in Benefit Awards |
English Title: | Disability Insurance Benefits and Labor Supply Choices: Evidence from a Discontinuity in Benefit Awards |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | Disability insurance benefits; Labor market participation; Fuzzy regression discontinuity design Endogenous switching models; Maximum simulated likelihood |
Subjects: | C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C3 - Multiple or Simultaneous Equation Models ; Multiple Variables > C35 - Discrete Regression and Qualitative Choice Models ; Discrete Regressors ; Proportions C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C3 - Multiple or Simultaneous Equation Models ; Multiple Variables > C36 - Instrumental Variables (IV) Estimation J - Labor and Demographic Economics > J2 - Demand and Supply of Labor > J22 - Time Allocation and Labor Supply |
Item ID: | 70957 |
Depositing User: | Tobias Müller |
Date Deposited: | 25 Apr 2016 15:01 |
Last Modified: | 27 Sep 2019 01:38 |
References: | Angrist, J. D. & Pischke, J.-S. (2009), Mostly Harmless Econometrics - An Empiricist's Companion, Princeton University Press. Autor, D. H. & Duggan, M. G. (2003), The Rise in Disability Rolls and the Decline in Unemployment, The Quarterly Journal of Economics, vol. 118 (1), 157-205. Bhat, C. (2001), Quasi-random maximum simulated likelihood estimation of the mixed multinomial logit model, Transportation Research, B 35, 677-693. Bound, J. (1989), The health and earnings of rejected disability insurance applicants, American Economic Review, vol. 79 (3), 482-503. Bound, J. & Burkhauser, R. V. (1999), Economic analysis of transfer programs targeted on people with disabilities. In: Ashenfelter, O., Card, D. (Eds.), Handbook of Labor Economics, vol. 3C. North-Holland, Amsterdam. Burkhauser, R. V., Daly M. C., McVicar D., Wilkins R. (2013), Disability Benefit Growth and Disability Reform in the U.S.: Lessons from Other OECD Nations, Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco, Working Paper Series. Bunch, D. (1991), Estimability in the multinomial probit model, Transportation research, B 25, 1-12. Cai, L. (2010), The relationship between health and labour force participation: Evidence from a panel data simultaneous equation model, Labour Economics, vol. 17(1), 77-90. Cameron, A. C. & Trivedi, P. K. (2005), Microeconometrics: Methods and Applications, First edition. Cambridge University Press, 516-519. Campolieti, M. (2004), Disability Insurance Benefits and Labor Supply: Some Additional Evidence, Journal of Labor Economics, vol. 22 (4), 863-889. Cappellari, L. & Jenkins, S. P. (2006), Calculation of multivariate normal probabilities by simulation with applications to maximum simulated likelihood estimation, IZA Discussion Paper, No. 2112. Chen, S. & Van der Klaauw, W. (2008), The work disincentive effects of the disability insurance program in the 1990s, Journal of Econometrics, vol. 142, 757-784. De Jong, P., Lindeboom, M., & Van der Klaauw, B. (2011). Screening disability insurance applications. Journal of the European Economic Association, 9(1), 106-129. Eugster, B., & Deuchert, E. (2015). Crawling up the cash cliff? Behavioral responses to a disability insurance reform. Working paper. Federal Social Insurance Office (FSIO) (2014), Statistiken zur Sozialen Sicherheit, IV-Statistik 2013: http://www.bsv.admin.ch/dokumentation/zahlen/00095/00442/ Federal Social Insurance Office (FSIO) (2013), Merkblätter, 4.01 - Leistungen der IV: http://www.ahv-iv.info/andere/00134/00186/index.html?lang=de Federal Social Insurance Office (FSIO) (2013), Merkblätter, 4.06 - Das IV-Verfahren: http://www.ahv-iv.info/andere/00134/00186/index.html?lang=de French, E., & Song, J. (2014). The effect of disability insurance receipt on labor supply. American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, 6(2), 291-337. Frutos, E. M. L., & Castello, J. V. (2015). Equal health, equal work? The role of disability benefits in employment after controlling for health status. The European Journal of Health Economics, 16(3), 329-340. Gastwirth, J. L. (1972), On the decline of male labor force participation, Monthly Labor Review, vol. 95 (10), 44-46. Geweke, J. (1991), Efficient simulation from multivariate normal and Student-t distributions subject to linear constraints, in E. M. Keramidas, ed., Computer Science and Statistics: Proceedings of the Twenty-Third Symposium on the Interface, Interface Foundation of North America, Inc., Fairfax, 571-578. Geweke, J., Keane M., Runkle D. (1994), Alternative computational approaches to inference in the multinomial probit model, The review of economics and statistics, 609-632. Gouriéroux Ch. & Monfort A. (1991), Simulation Based Inference in Models with Heterogeneity, Annales d'Économie et de Statistique, vol. 20/21, pp. 69-107. Gruber, J. (2000), Disability Insurance Benefits and Labor Supply, Journal of Political Economy, vol. 108 (6), 1162-1183. Gruber, J., Kubik, J. D. (1997), Disability Insurance Rejection Rates and the Labor Supply of Older Workers, Journal of Public Economics, vol. 64, 1-23. Hajivassiliou, V., McFadden, D., Ruud, P. (1994), Simulation of multivariate normal rectangle probabilities and their derivatives: Theoretical and computational results, Journal of Econometrics, vol. 72, 85-134. Hajivassiliou, V. & McFadden, D. (1998), The Method of Simulated Scores for the Estimation of LDV Models, Econometrica, vol. 66, 863-896. Hammersley, J. & Morton, K. (1956), A new Monte Carlo technique: Antithetic variates, Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society, vol. 52, 449-474. Karlström, A. M. P. & Svensson, I. (2008), The Employment Effect of Stricter Rules for Eligibility for DI: Evidence from a Natural Experiment in Sweden, Journal of Public Economics, Vol. 92 (10-11), 2071-2082. Kauer, L. (2014). The Effect of Cutting Disability Insurance Benefits on Labor Supply in Households. Department of Economics, University of St. Gallen. Keane, M. (1990), Four essays in empirical macro and labor economics, PhD Thesis, Brown University. Keane, M. (1994), A computationally practical simulation estimator for panel data, Econometrica, vol. 62, 95-116. Lee, K. W. (2015). Optimal disability insurance with unobservable skill heterogeneity. Journal of Public Economics, 122, 94-109. Lee, D. S. & Lemieux, T. (2009), Regression Discontinuity Designs in Economics, National Bureau of Economic Research, No. w14723. Marie, O., & Castello, J. V. (2012). Measuring the (income) effect of disability insurance generosity on labour market participation. Journal of Public Economics, 96(1), 198-210. Marschak, J. (1960), Binary choice constraints on random utility indications, in K. Arrow, Stanford Symposium on Mathematical Methods in the Social Sciences. Standford University Press, 312-329. McCrary, J. (2008), Manipulation of the Running Variable in the Regression Discontinuity Design: A Density Test, Journal of Econometrics, February 2008, 142 (2), 698-714. Miranda, A. & Rabe-Hesketh, S. (2006), Maximum likelihood estimation of endogenous switching and sample selection models for binary, ordinal, and count variables, Stata Journal, vol. 6 (3), 285-308. Moore, T. J. (2015). The employment effects of terminating disability benefits. Journal of Public Economics, 124, 30-43. OECD (2009), OECD Employment Outlook, Pathways onto (and off) Disability Benefits: Assessing the Role of Policy and Individual Circumstances. OECD Publishing. OECD (2010), Sickness, Disability and Work: Breaking the Barriers - A Synthesis of Findings across OECD countries. Paris. OECD Publishing. Roodman, D. (2011), Fitting Fully Observed Recursive Mixed-Process Models with cmp, Stata Journal, vol. 11 (2), 159-206. Shu, P. (2015). Asset accumulation and labor force participation of disability insurance applicants. Journal of Public Economics, 129, 26-40. Staubli, S. (2011), The impact of stricter criteria for disability insurance on labor force participation, Journal of Public Economics, vol. 95 (9-10), 1223-1235. Stock, J. H. & Yogo, M. (2005), Testing for weak instruments in linear IV regression, National Bureau of Economic Research, NBER Technical Working Paper No. 284. Swisher, I. G. (1973), The disabled and the decline in men's labor force participation, Monthly Labor Review, vol. 96 (11), 53. Swiss Household Panel (2014), FORS Surveys, Swiss Household Panel: http://forscenter.ch/en/our-surveys/swiss-household-panel/ Train, E. K. (2009), Discrete Choice Methods with Simulation, Second Edition. Cambridge University Press. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/70957 |