Ali, Mazhar (2016): Evaluating Advertising Effectiveness of Creative Television Advertisements for High Involvement Products. Published in: PAKISTAN BUSINESS REVIEW (January 2016)
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_72699.pdf Download (108kB) | Preview |
Abstract
This study investigates advertising effectiveness of creative TV advertisements (Ads) for high involvement products. The majority of such studies have been conducted using low involvement products. There is a need to conduct a research to find out the effectiveness of creative advertisements for high involvement products.This study will fill this knowledge gap. This study aimed at measuring the impact of creativity in Ads on Attitude toward Advertisement,Unaided Recall and Purchase intention. It involved 94 university students in an experimental research. Paired sample t-test was used for evaluating creative and control Ads .Data analysis reveals that creative Ads are better than control Ads in generating favorable attitude toward ad and high Ad recall but equally ineffective in persuading customers to buy. Binary logistic regression showed small role of creativity in causing high Ad recall while multiple regression analysis confirmed the supremacy of creative Ads for forming a favorable attitude toward Ad.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Evaluating Advertising Effectiveness of Creative Television Advertisements for High Involvement Products. |
English Title: | "Evaluating Advertising Effectiveness of Creative Television Advertisements for High Involvement Products" |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | Creativity, advertising effectiveness, purchase intention, Aided Recall, Un-aided Recall, Product involvement. |
Subjects: | M - Business Administration and Business Economics ; Marketing ; Accounting ; Personnel Economics > M3 - Marketing and Advertising > M37 - Advertising M - Business Administration and Business Economics ; Marketing ; Accounting ; Personnel Economics > M3 - Marketing and Advertising > M39 - Other |
Item ID: | 72699 |
Depositing User: | Mr. Mazhar Ali |
Date Deposited: | 31 Jul 2016 04:46 |
Last Modified: | 27 Sep 2019 01:22 |
References: | Ahmad, W., & Mahmood, Z. (2011). An Empirical Investigation of the Association between Creative Advertising and Advertising Effectiveness in Pakistan. International Journal of Marketing Studies, 3(2), p32. Amabile, T. (1983) The Social Psychology of Creativity. New York: Springer-Veclay Batra, R., Myers, J. G., & Aaker, D. A. (1996). Advertising management (5th edn.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall. Ang, S. H., Lee, Y. H., & Leong, S. M. (2007). The ad creativity cube: conceptualization and initial validation. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 35(2), 220-232. Belch, G. E., & Belch, M. A. (2004). Advertising and promotion: An integrated marketing communication perspective (6th edn.). Boston, MA: McGraw-Hill. Besemer, S. and O’Quinn, K. (1986) ‘Analyzing Creative Products: Refinement and Test of a Judging Instrument’, Journal of Creative Behavior 20(2): 115–26. Brasini, S., Freo, M., Lezzi, E., & Tassinari, G. (2008). An analysis of the role of liking on the memorial response to advertising. MTISD 2008. Methods, Models and Information Technologies for Decision Support Systems, 1(1), 16-19 Colley, R. H. (1961). Defining advertising goals: For measured advertising results. The Association. Corvi,E & Bonera,M.(2010) The effectiveness of advertising: a literature review, 10TH Global Conference on Business and Economics,, October 15-16, pp. 3-11 Edell, Julie A. and Marian Chapman Burke (1987), "The Power of Feelings in Understanding Advertising Effects," Journal of Consumer Research, 14 (December), 421-433 Geuens, M., & De Pelsmacker, P. (1998). Feelings evoked by warm, erotic, humorous or non-emotional print advertisements for alcoholic beverages.Academy of marketing science review, 1, 1-31. Goldenberg, ]., D. Mazursky, S. Solomon. 1999. The fundamental templates of quality ads. Marketing Sci. 18(3) 333-351. Haberland, G. and Dacin, P.A. (1992) ‘The Development of a Measure to Assess Viewers’ Judgments of the Creativity of an Advertisement: A Preliminary Study’, Advances in Consumer Research 19: 817–25. Hauser, J. R., & Wernerfelt, B. (1990). An evaluation cost model of consideration sets. Journal of consumer research, 393-408. Heckler, S. E., & Childers, T. L. (1992). The role of expectancy and relevancy in memory for verbal and visual information: what is incongruency?. Journal of Consumer Research, 475-492. Jackson, P.W. and Messick, S. (1965) ‘The Person, the Product, and the Response:Conceptual Problems in the Assessment of Creativity’, Journal of Personality 33 (March–December): 309–29. . Krugman, H. E. (1972). Why three exposures may be enough. Journal of Advertising Research, 12 (December), 11-28. Laurent, G., & Kapferer, J. N. (1985). Measuring consumer involvement profiles.Journal of marketing research, 41-53. Lavidge, R. J., & Steiner, G. A. (1961). A model for predictive measurements of advertising effectiveness. The Journal of Marketing, 59-62. MacKenzie, S. B., Lutz, R. J., & Belch, G. E. (1986). The role of attitude toward the ad as a mediator of advertising effectiveness: A test of competing explanations. Journal of marketing research, 130-143. MacKenzie, S. B., & Lutz, R. J. (1989). An empirical examination of the structural antecedents of attitude toward the ad in an advertising pretesting context. The Journal of Marketing, 48-65. Mitchell, A. A. (1986). The effect of verbal and visual components of advertisements on brand attitudes and attitude toward the advertisement.Journal of Consumer Research, 12-24. Petty, R. E., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1986). The elaboration likelihood model of persuasion. Advances in experimental social psychology, 19, 123-205. Pieters, R., Warlop, L., & Wedel, M. (2002). Breaking through the clutter: Benefits of advertisement originality and familiarity for brand attention and memory. Management Science, 48(6), 765-781. Schiffman, L.G. and Kanuk, L.L. (1987), Consumer Behavior, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ Smith, R. E., & Yang, X. (2004). Toward a general theory of creativity in advertising: Examining the role of divergence. Marketing Theory, 4(1-2), 31-58. Smith, R. E., MacKenzie, S. B., Yang, X., Buchholz, L. M., & Darley, W. K. (2007). Modeling the determinants and effects of creativity in advertising.Marketing Science, 26(6), 819-833. Singh, S. N., & Rothschild, M. L. (1983). Recognition as a measure of learning from television commercials. Journal of Marketing Research, 235-248. Singh, S. N., Rothschild, M. L., & Churchill Jr, G. A. (1988). Recognition versus recall as measures of television commercial forgetting. Journal of Marketing Research, 72-80. Sobel, R.S. and Rothenberg, A. (1980) ‘Artistic Creation as Stimulated by Superimposed Versus Separated Visual Images’, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 39 (November): 953–61. Till, B. D., & Baack, D. W. (2005). Recall and persuasion: Does creative advertising matter? Journal of Advertising, 34 (3), 47-57 Thorson, E. and Zhao, X. (1997) ‘Television Viewing Behavior as an Indicator of Commercial Effectiveness’, in William D. Wells (ed.) Measuring Advertising Effectiveness. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Yang, X., & Smith, R. E. (2009). Beyond attention effects: Modeling the persuasive and emotional effects of advertising creativity. Marketing Science,28(5), 935-949. Wells, W.D. (1989) Planning for R.O.I.: Effective Advertising Strategy. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Wiley. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/72699 |