Demir, Caner and Yurteri, Begüm and Türkcan, Burcu (2013): Yeniliklerin Dış Ticarete Etkileri Üzerine Mekansal Ekonometrik Bir Analiz: 2002-2009 Türkiye Örneği. Published in: Türkiye Ekonomisinde Dönüşüm ve Yeniden Yapılanma Arayışları (13 June 2013): pp. 71-81.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_77615.pdf Download (671kB) | Preview |
Abstract
This study deals with the interaction between innovations and foreign trade across NUTS2 (Nomenclature of Territorial Units for Statistics–2) regions of Turkey during the time period of 2002–2009. The aim of this study is to deal with the effects of innovations on the foreign trade, by considering the spatial effects across regions. In this context, the export booster and import dimmer effects of innovations are examined through estimating two separate models for export and import. Particularly, the import model has a special importance by investigating whether innovations can be a solution to Turkey’s chronic dependence on imported inputs. Besides, choice of the research sample as NUTS2 level, allows us to examine the clustering tendency of innovations, imports and exports. The evidences show that in both export and import models, innovations have significant and positive effects on dependent variables and this result proves that in Turkey innovations have a boost effect on both variables. In addition to these, the evidences related to testing spatial effect show that there is a clustering tendency for export, import and innovations. Also this result reveals that neighborhood relations are effective on the interaction between regions.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Yeniliklerin Dış Ticarete Etkileri Üzerine Mekansal Ekonometrik Bir Analiz: 2002-2009 Türkiye Örneği |
English Title: | A Spatial Econometric Analysis on the Effects of Innovations on Foreign Trade: 2002-2009 Turkey Case |
Language: | Turkish |
Keywords: | Innovation, Export, Import, Spatial Panel Data Analysis |
Subjects: | C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C2 - Single Equation Models ; Single Variables > C21 - Cross-Sectional Models ; Spatial Models ; Treatment Effect Models ; Quantile Regressions F - International Economics > F1 - Trade > F10 - General O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O3 - Innovation ; Research and Development ; Technological Change ; Intellectual Property Rights > O31 - Innovation and Invention: Processes and Incentives R - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics > R1 - General Regional Economics > R12 - Size and Spatial Distributions of Regional Economic Activity |
Item ID: | 77615 |
Depositing User: | Dr. Caner Demir |
Date Deposited: | 21 Mar 2017 05:35 |
Last Modified: | 28 Sep 2019 02:03 |
References: | Anselin,L. (2003), “Spatial Externalities”, International Regional Science Review, 26,2: 147 – 152. Anselin,L. (2003), “Spatial Externalities, Spatial Multipliers, and Spatial Econometrics”. International Regional Science Review, 26, 2: 153-166 Antonelli, C. (2008), Localised Technological Change – Towards the Economics of Complexity. Routledge Studies in Global Competition, USA and Canada. Bertschek, I. (1995), ‘Product and Process Innovation as a Response to Increasing Imports and Foreign Direct Investment’, The Journal of Industrial Economics, vol. 43, No. 4, ss. 341 – 35 Caldera, A. (2010), “Innovation and Exporting: Evidence From Spanish Manufacturing Firms”, Review of World Economics, Volume 146, Number 4, ss. 657-689. Claver, N.D. ve Castejon, C.F. (2006), “External Economies as a Mechanism of Agglomeration in OECD Manufacturing”. University of Zaragoza. European Commission. (2006), “Constructing Regional Advantage: Principles – Perspectives – Policies”. Brussels. Freeman, C. ve Soete, L. (2003), Yenilik İktisadı, (Çev. Ergun Türkcan). Türkiye Bilimsel ve Teknik Araştırma Kurumu. Ankara. Greenhalgh, C. (1990), “Innovation and Trade Performance in the United Kingdom”. The Economic Journal. Vol. 100. No.400. ss. 105-118. Grossman, G.M. ve Helpman, E. (1990), “Trade, Innovation and Growth”. The American Economic Review. Vol. 80. No.2, ss. 86 – 91. Grossman, G. M., ve Helpman, E. (1991), “Quality Ladders in The Theory of Growth”, Review of Economic Studies 58, ss43-61. Hsiao, Cheng (2002), “Analysis of Panel Data”, West Nyack, Ny, USA: Cambridge University Press. LeSage, James P., Econometrics Toolbox, http://www.spatial-econometrics.com/html/download.html (Erişim 30.12.2011) Marx, K. (1867), Kapital - Birinci Cilt. Çev. Alaattin Bilgi (2009), Sol Yayınları, Ankara. Maskus, K.E. ve Penubarti, M. (1995), “How Trade-Related are Intellectual Property Rights?”. Journal of International Economics. Vol 39: 3-4. ss. 227-248. OECD, (2009), “Regions Matter: Economic Recovery, Innovation and Sustainable Growth”. Santacreu, A.M. (2011), “Innovation, Diffusion and Trade: Theory and Measurement”. MPRA Paper No 35311. http://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/35311/ (Erişim: 30.12.2011). Schumpeter, J.A. (1942), Kapitalizm Sosyalizm ve Demokrasi, Çev. Hasan İlhan (2007), Alter Yayıncılık. Şen, A., Çelebioğlu F. Ve Altay H. (2009), “Bilgi ve TeknolojiDeğişkenlerinin Ticaret Hadleri Üzerine Etkisi”, Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi İİBF Dergisi, Cilt 14, Sayı:2, ss. 361-374 TÜİK, “İller Bazında İhracat ve İthalat Verileri”. http://www.tuik.gov.tr Türk Patent Enstitüsü, “1995 – 2009 İller Bazında Patent, Endüstriyel Tasarım, Faydalı Model ve Marka Verileri”. http://www.turkpatent.gov.tr |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/77615 |