Are population and international trade the main factors for environmental damage in China?

Vu, Binh (2017): Are population and international trade the main factors for environmental damage in China?

Abstract

This paper investigates whether population and international trade, along with energy consumption, are the main factors for environmental damage in China during the period 1971-2011. The stationary analysis is examined by the Zivot–Andrews unit root test and the ARDL bounds testing approach is used for a long run relationship between the series in the presence of structural breaks. The causality between CO2 emissions, energy consumption, economic growth, population and international trade is examined by the VECM Granger causality technique. Our results show that the selected variables are cointegrated; it means that the long run relationship exists in the presence of structural breaks. The empirical findings indicate that in long run, energy consumption and population increase CO2 emissions, while in short run, energy consumption and international trade decrease CO2 emissions. The VECM causality analysis shows that CO2 emissions Granger cause energy consumption, while energy consumption and population Granger cause trade. The VECM analysis also indicates the feedback hypothesis between trade and CO2 emissions. Policy recommendations are made following the obtained results.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: CO2 emissions; population; international trade; energy consumption.
• Subjects: C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C2 - Single Equation Models ; Single Variables > C22 - Time-Series Models ; Dynamic Quantile Regressions ; Dynamic Treatment Effect Models ; Diffusion Processes; O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O4 - Economic Growth and Aggregate Productivity > O44 - Environment and Growth; Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q4 - Energy > Q43 - Energy and the Macroeconomy; Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q5 - Environmental Economics > Q53 - Air Pollution ; Water Pollution ; Noise ; Hazardous Waste ; Solid Waste ; Recycling; Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q5 - Environmental Economics > Q56 - Environment and Development ; Environment and Trade ; Sustainability ; Environmental Accounts and Accounting ; Environmental Equity ; Population Growth

References

1] World_Bank. World development indicators. 2017; Available from: http://data.worldbank.org/country/china [accessed 10.01.2017]

[2] Li, D. and D. Yang, Does non-fossil energy usage lower CO2 emissions? Empirical evidence from China. Sustainability, 2016. 8(9): 1-11.

[3] Shahbaz, M., Q.M.A. Hye, A.K. Tiwari, and N.C. Leitão, Economic growth, energy consumption, financial development, international trade and CO2 emissions in Indonesia. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2013. 25: 109-121.

[4] Islam, F., M. SHAHBAZ, and M.S. BUTT, Is there an environmental Kuznets curve for Bangladesh? Evidence from ARDL Bounds testing approach. Bangladesh Development Studies, 2013. 36(4): 1-23.

[5] Linh, D.H. and S.-M. Lin, CO2 emissions, energy consumption, economic growth and foreign direct investment in Vietnam. Managing Global Transitions, 2014. 12(3): 219-232.

[6] Tang, C.F. and B.W. Tan, The impact of energy consumption, income and foreign direct investment on carbon dioxide emissions in Vietnam. Energy, 2015. 79: 447-454.

[7] Shahbaz, M., H.H. Lean, and M.S. Shabbir, Environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis in Pakistan: Cointegration and Granger causality. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2012. 16(5): 2947-2953.

[8] Nain, M.Z., W. Ahmad, and B. Kamaiah, Economic growth, energy consumption and CO2 emissions in India: a disaggregated causal analysis. International Journal of Sustainable Energy, 2015: 1-18.

[9] Mohapatra, G. and A.K. Giri, Energy consumption, economic growth and CO2 emissions: Empirical evidence from India. The Empirical Econometrics and Quantitative Economics Letters, 2015. 4(1): 17-32.

[10] Uddin, M.G.S., S.H. Bidisha, and I. Ozturk, Carbon emissions, energy consumption, and economic growth relationship in Sri Lanka. Energy Sources, Part B: Economics, Planning, and Policy, 2016. 11(3): 282-287.

[11] Hossain, S., An econometric analysis for CO2 emissions, energy consumption, economic growth, foreign trade and urbanization of Japan. Low Carbon Economy, 2012. 03(03): 92-105.

[12] Dogan, E. and B. Turkekul, CO2 emissions, real output, energy consumption, trade, urbanization and financial development: testing the EKC hypothesis for the USA. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int, 2016. 23(2): 1203-13.

[13] Jalil, A. and M. Feridun, The impact of growth, energy and financial development on the environment in China: A cointegration analysis. Energy Economics, 2011. 33(2): 284-291.

[14] Bloch, H., S. Rafiq, and R. Salim, Coal consumption, CO2 emission and economic growth in China: Empirical evidence and policy responses. Energy Economics, 2012. 34(2): 518-528.

[15] Alper, A. and G. Onur, Environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis for sub-elements of the carbon emissions in China. Natural Hazards, 2016. 82(2): 1327-1340.

[16] Solarin, S.A. and H.H. Lean, Natural gas consumption, income, urbanization, and CO2 emissions in China and India. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int, 2016. 23(18): 18753-65.

[17] Dickey, D.A. and W.A. Fuller, Distribution of the estimators for autoregressive time series with a unit root. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 1979. 74(366): 427-431.

[18] Kwiatkowski, D., P.C.B. Phillips, P. Schmidt, and Y. Shin, Testing the null hypothesis of stationarity against the alternative of a unit root: How sure are we that economic time series have a unit root?. Journal of Econometrics 1992. 54: 159-178.

[19] Zivot, E. and D.W.K. Andrews, Further evidence on the great crash, the oil-price shock, and the unit-root hypothesis. Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, 1992. 10(3): 151-270.

[20] Pesaran, M.H., Y. Shin, and R.J. Smith, Bounds testing approaches to the analysis of level relationships. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 2001. 16(3): 289-326.

[21] Narayan, P.K. and R. Smyth, Electricity consumption, employment and real income in Australia evidence from multivariate Granger causality tests. Energy Policy, 2005. 33(9): 1109-1116.

[22] Rahman, M.M. and S.A.K. Mamun, Energy use, international trade and economic growth nexus in Australia: New evidence from an extended growth model. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2016. 64: 806-816.

[23] Johansen, S., Statistical analysis of cointegration vectors. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control 1988. 12: 231-254.

[24] Johansen, S., Estimation and hypothesis testing of cointegration vectors in Gaussian vector. Econometrica, 1991. 59(6): 1551-1580.

[25] Lee, C.-C. and M.-S. Chien, Dynamic modelling of energy consumption, capital stock, and real income in G-7 countries. Energy Economics, 2010. 32(3): 564-581.

[26] Granger, C.W.J., Investigating causal relations by econometric models and cross-spectral methods. Econometrica, 1969. 37(3): 424-438.

[27] Sahoo, A.K., N.C. Sahu, D. Sahoo, and B.B. Pradhan, Mineral export and economic growth in India: evidence from VAR model analysis. Mineral Economics, 2014. 27(1): 51-58.

[28] Chiu, C.-L. and T.-H. Chang, What proportion of renewable energy supplies is needed to initially mitigate CO2 emissions in OECD member countries? Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2009. 13(6-7): 1669-1674.