Municipal mergers and special provisions of local council members in Japan

Hirota, Haruaki and Yunoue, Hideo (2011): Municipal mergers and special provisions of local council members in Japan. Published in: The Japanese Political Economy , Vol. 40, No. 3-4 (2 October 2014): pp. 96-116.

Abstract

The number of municipalities in Japan has decreased from 3,232 in 1999 to 1,820 in 2006 because of municipal mergers, called Heisei-no-Daigappei. This paper estimates the political choices of local council members in Japan’s municipal mergers. In Japan, being a local council member is a full-time job. The local council has “veto powers” over local administration. Since the wage for a local council member is quite high, council members like to keep their seats. The jobs of local council members are affected by municipal mergers, as preferential treatment and penalties are delivered by the central government to the local government in municipal mergers. In our results, merged municipalities apply “Special Provisions” for local council members because of the size of the municipality. The choice of municipality is also affected by the national government’s political power. In addition, Special Provisions lead to additional fiscal burdens. These fiscal burdens will transfer to the whole country because “the Local Allocation Tax grants system” (abbreviated as LAT grants), a national grants system, works well in Japan. The municipalities that choose the Special Provisions exploit the benefits from other municipalities without any additional costs. Our results show that the central government induces the free-rider problem in Japan.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: municipal mergers, local council size, intergovernmental relations, free riding
• Subjects: H - Public Economics > H7 - State and Local Government ; Intergovernmental Relations > H77 - Intergovernmental Relations ; Federalism ; Secession; H - Public Economics > H1 - Structure and Scope of Government > H11 - Structure, Scope, and Performance of Government; D - Microeconomics > D7 - Analysis of Collective Decision-Making > D72 - Political Processes: Rent-Seeking, Lobbying, Elections, Legislatures, and Voting Behavior

References

Baqir, R. (2002). Districting and government overspending. Journal of Political Economy, 110, 1318–1354.

Bodkin, R. G., Conklin, D. W. (1971). Scale and other determinants of municipal government expenditures in Ontario: A quantitative analysis. International Economic Review, 12, 65–81.

Bradbury, J. C., Crain, W.M. (2001). Legislative organization and government spending: Cross-country evidence. Journal of Public Economics, 82, 309–325.

Bradbury, J. C., Stephenson, F. (2003). Local government structure and public expenditures. Public Choice, 115, 185–198.

Dolley, B., Byrnes, J., Crase, L. (2007). Is bigger better? Local government amalgamation and the south Australian rising to the challenge inquiry, Economic Analysis & Policy, 37(1), 1-14.

Egger, P., Koethenbuerger, M. (2010). Government spending and legislative organization: Quasi-experimental evidence from Germany. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 2(4), 200–212.

Geys, B., Heinemann, F., Kalb, A., (2007). Local governments in the wake of demographic change: efficiency and economics of scale in German municipalities, ZEW discussion paper No.07-036.

Hanes, N. (2003). Amalgamation impact on local public expenditures in Sweden.Working Paper. Umeå University.

Hirota, H. (2007). Verification of municipal incorporation with discrete choice model. Planning Administration, 30(4), 75–81 (In Japanese).

Hirota, H., Yunoue, H. (2009). Municipal mergers and local government expenditure. Evidence from Heisei municipal mergers in Japan. Mimeo (In Japanese).

Hirota, H., Yunoue, H. (2011). Do municipal mergers affect local council expenditures? Evidence from municipal mergers in Japan. Annual Journal of Japanese Local Public Finance, 18, 62–84 (In Japanese).

Hirsch, W. (1959). Expenditure implications of metropolitan growth and consolidation. Review of Economics and Statistics, 41, 232–241.

Hirsch, W. (1965). Cost functions of an urban government service: Refuse collection. Review of Economics and Statistics, 47, 87–93.

Ihori, T. (2009). Political decentralization and fiscal reconstruction in Japan. In S. Ichimura & R. Bahl (Eds), Decentralization policies in Asian development (Ch. 3, pp. 55–83). Singapore: World Scientific.

Jordahl, H., Liang, C-Y. (2010). Merged municipalities, higher debt: On free-riding and the common pool problem in politics. Public Choice, 143, 157–172.

Kawamura, K. (2010). Political attitudes, local elections and municipals mergers in Japan. Tokyo: Bokutakusha. (In Japanese).

Kawaura, A. (2009). Self-serving mayors and local government consolidations in Hokkaido, mimeo.

Nelson, M. A. (1992). Municipal amalgamation and the growth of the local public sector in Sweden. Journal of Regional Science, 32, 39–53.

Saito, S., Yunoue, H. (2009). The reform of Japanese local governments. In Ichimura, S., & R. Bahl (Eds), Decentralization Policies in Asian Development (Ch. 11, pp. 265–280). Singapore: World Scientific.

Sørensen, R. L. (2006). Local government consolidations: The impact of political transaction costs. Public Choice, 127, 75–95.

Sumi, E., (2000). Hojokin no Chiiki Haibun ni Okeru Seiji Kanryo Youin no Kensyo, Mita Gakkai Zasshi 93(1), 33–50 (In Japanese).

Tyrefors Hinnerich, B. (2009). Do merging local governments free ride on their counterparts when facing boundary reform? Journal of Public Economics, 93, 721–728.

Walzer, N. (1972). Economies of scale and municipal police services: The Illinois experience. Review of Economics and Statistics, 60, 431–470.

Yunoue, H. (2005). Influences of bureaucrats on special local allocation tax grants, Public Choice Studies, 45, 24–44 (In Japanese).