Qin, Wei-zhi and Rommeswinkel, Hendrik (2017): Conditionally Additive Utility Representations.
This is the latest version of this item.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_80912.pdf Download (475kB) | Preview |
Abstract
Advances in behavioral economics have made decision theoretic models increasingly complex. Utility models incorporating insights from psychology often lack additive separability, a major obstacle for decision theoretic axiomatizations. We address this challenge by providing a representation theorem for utility functions of the form $u(x,y,z)=f(x,z) + g(y,z)$. We call these representations conditionally additive as they are additively separable only when holding fixed $z$. We generalize the result to spaces with more than three dimensions. We provide axiomatizations for consumption preferences with reference points, as well as consumption preferences over time with dependence across time periods. Our results also allow us to generalize the theory of additive representations to simplexes.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Conditionally Additive Utility Representations |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | utility; representation theorem; additive; conditionally additive; ordered space |
Subjects: | D - Microeconomics > D0 - General > D01 - Microeconomic Behavior: Underlying Principles D - Microeconomics > D0 - General > D03 - Behavioral Microeconomics: Underlying Principles D - Microeconomics > D1 - Household Behavior and Family Economics > D11 - Consumer Economics: Theory |
Item ID: | 80912 |
Depositing User: | Prof. Hendrik Rommeswinkel |
Date Deposited: | 21 Aug 2017 22:15 |
Last Modified: | 27 Sep 2019 05:36 |
References: | Abdellaoui, M. (2009). Rank-Dependent Utility. In Anand, P., Pattanaik, P. K., and Puppe, C., editors, The Handbook of Rational and Social Choice, pages 69-89. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK. Chew, S. H. and Sagi, J. S. (2008). Small worlds: Modeling attitudes toward sources of uncertainty. Journal of Economic Theory, 139(1):1-24. Debreu, G. (1959). Topological Methods in Cardinal Utility Theory. In Arrow, K. J., Karlin, P., and Suppes, P., editors, Mathematial Methods in the Social Sciences, pages 16-26. Stanford University Press, Stanford. Dreze, J. H. and Rustichini, A. (1999). Moral hazard and conditional prefer ences. Journal of Mathematical Economics, 31(2):159-181. Fehr, E. and Schmidt, K. M. (1999). A theory of fairness, competition, and cooperation. The quarterly journal of economics, 114(3):817-868. Gorman, W. M. (1968). The Structure of Utility Functions. The Review of Economic Studies, 35(4):367-390. Herstein, I. N. and Milnor, J. (1953). An Axiomatic Approach to Measurable Utility. Econometrica, 21(2):291-297. Hosszu, M. (1971). On the functional equation F(x+y,z)+F(x,y)=F(x,y+z)+F(y,z). Periodica Mathematica Hungarica, 1:213-216. Karni, E. (1998). The Hexagon Condition and Additive Representation for Two Dimensions: An Algebraic Approach. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 42:393-399. Karni, E. (2006). Subjective expected utility theory without states of the world. Journal of Mathematical Economics, 42(3):325-342. Kydland, F. E. and Prescott, E. C. (1982). Time to Build and Aggregate Fluctuations. Econometrica, 50(6):1345-1370. Munkres, J. (2014). Topology. Pearson, Essex, UK. Neilson, W. S. (2006). Axiomatic reference-dependence in behavior toward others and toward risk. Economic Theory, 28(3):681-692. Puppe, C. (1990). The irrelevance axiom, relative utility and choice under risk. Quiggin, J. (1982). A Theory of Anticipated Utility. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 3:323-343. Reidemeister, K. (1929). Topologische Fragen der Differentialgeometrie. V. Gewebe und Gruppen. Mathematische Zeitschrift, 29(1):427-435. Rohde, K. I. M. (2010). A preference foundation for Fehr and Schmidt's model of inequity aversion. Social Choice and Welfare, 34(4):537-547. Rozen, K. (2010). Foundations of Intrinsic Habit Formation. Econometrica, 78(4):1341-1373. Ryder, H. E. and Heal, G. M. (1973). Optimal Growth with Intertemporally Dependent Preferences. The Review of Economic Studies, 40(1):1-31. Savage, L. J. (1972). The Foundations of Statistics. Courier Corporation. Segal, U. (1989). Anticipated utility: A measure representation approach. Annals of Operations Research, 19(1):359-373. Segal, U. (1992). Additively Separable Representation on Non-convex Sets. Journal of Economic Theory, 56:89-99. Segal, U. (1993). The measure representation: A correction. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 6(1):99-107. Sugden, R. (2003). Reference-dependent subjective expected utility. Journal of Economic Theory, 111(2):172-191. Tversky, A. and Kahneman, D. (1992). Advances in prospect theory: Cumulative representation of uncertainty. Journal of Risk and uncertainty, 5(4):297-323. Vind, K. (1991). Independent preferences. Journal of Mathematical Economics, 20(1):119-135. von Neumann, J. and Morgenstern, O. (1944). Theory of Games and Economic Behavior. Princeton University Press. Wakai, K. (2007). Risk Non-Separability without Force of Habit. Wakker, P. (1993). Counterexamples to Segal's measure representation theorem. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 6(1):91-98. Wakker, P. and Chateauneuf, A. (1993). From local to global additive representation. Journal of Mathematical Economics, 22:523-545. Wakker, P. and Tversky, A. (1993). An axiomatization of cumulative prospect theory. Journal of risk and uncertainty, 7(2):147-175. Wakker, P. P. (1989). Additive Representations of Preferences: A New Foundation of Decision Analysis, volume 4. Springer Science & Business Media. Wang, T. (2003). Conditional preferences and updating. Journal of Economic Theory, 108(2):286-321. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/80912 |
Available Versions of this Item
-
Conditionally Additive Utility Representations. (deposited 06 Apr 2017 13:51)
- Conditionally Additive Utility Representations. (deposited 21 Aug 2017 22:15) [Currently Displayed]