The Completion Shift of German Universities of Applied Sciences

Gralka, Sabine and Wohlrabe, Klaus and Bornmann, Lutz (2017): The Completion Shift of German Universities of Applied Sciences.

Abstract

In research on higher education, the evaluation of completion and drop-out rates has generated a steady stream of interest for decades. While most studies only calculate quotes using student and graduate numbers for both phenomena, we propose to also consider the budget available to universities. We transfer the idea of the excellence shift from the research (Bornmann et al., 2017) to the teaching area, and particularly to the completion rate of educational entities. The completion shift shows institutions’ ability to produce graduates as measured against their basic academic teaching efficiency, thereby avoiding the well-known heterogeneity problem in efficiency measurement. Their politically determined focus on education makes German universities of applied science the perfect sample for evaluating this novel method. Using a comprehensive dataset covering the years 2008 to 2013, we show that the shift produces results, which correlate considerably with the results of the standard Data Envelopment Approach (DEA). Thus, we recommend the completion shift as an alternative method of efficiency measurement in the teaching area. Compared to DEA, the computation of the shift is easy and the results are understandable to non-economists.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: Efficiency, Completion Shift, DEA, Students, Universities of Applied Sciences
• Subjects: A - General Economics and Teaching > A2 - Economic Education and Teaching of Economics > A23 - Graduate; D - Microeconomics > D6 - Welfare Economics > D61 - Allocative Efficiency ; Cost-Benefit Analysis; H - Public Economics > H5 - National Government Expenditures and Related Policies > H52 - Government Expenditures and Education; I - Health, Education, and Welfare > I2 - Education and Research Institutions > I21 - Analysis of Education; I - Health, Education, and Welfare > I2 - Education and Research Institutions > I23 - Higher Education ; Research Institutions

References

Agasisti, T., & Dal Bianco, A. (2009). Reforming the university sector: effects on teaching efficiency—evidence from Italy. Higher Education, 57(4), 477.

Agasisti, T., & Gralka, S. (2017). The transient and persistent efficiency of Italian and German universities: A stochastic frontier analysis. CEPIE Working Paper.

Agasisti, T., & Haelermans, C. (2016). Comparing efficiency of public universities among European countries: Different incentives lead to different performances. Higher Education Quarterly, 70(1), 81–104.

Aulck, L., Velagapudi, N., Blumenstock, J., & West, J. (2016). Predicting Student Dropout in Higher Education. arXiv preprint: 1606.06364.

Başkaya, S., & Klumpp, M. (2014). International data envelopment analysis in higher education: how do institutional factors influence university efficiency? Journal of Business and Economics, 5(11), 2085–2090.

Bogetoft, P., & Otto, L. (2010). Benchmarking with Dea, Sfa, and R (Vol. 157). Springer Science & Business Media.

Bornmann, L., Wohlrabe, K., & de Moya Anegon, F. (2017). Calculating the excellence shift: How efficiently do institutions produce highly cited papers? Scientometrics, 112(3), 1859–1864.

Carter, C. F. (1972). The efficiency of universities. Higher Education, 1(1), 77–90.

Charnes, A., Cooper, W. W., & Rhodes, E. (1978). Measuring the efficiency of decision making units. European Journal of Operational Research, 2(6), 429–444.

De Witte, K., & López-Torres, L. (2017). Efficiency in education: a review of literature and a way forward. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 68(4), 339–363.

Destatis. (2016). Hochschulen auf einen Blick 2016. Accessed 31 August 2017

European Commission. (2015). Dropout and Completion in Higher Education in Europe, Annex 1: Literature Review. Education and Culture.

Gralka, S. (2016). Persistent inefficiency in the higher education sector: Evidence from Germany. CEPIE Working Paper 14/17.

Heublein, U. (2014). Student Drop-out from German Higher Education Institutions. European Journal of Education, 49(4), 497–513. doi:10.1111/ejed.12097

Johnes, G., & Johnes, J. (2009). Higher education institutions’ costs and efficiency: Taking the decomposition a further step. Economics of Education Review, 28(1), 107–113.

Johnes, G., & Schwarzenberger, A. (2011). Differences in cost structure and the evaluation of efficiency: the case of German universities. Education Economics, 19(5), 487–499.

Kempkes, G., & Pohl, C. (2010). The efficiency of German universities–some evidence from nonparametric and parametric methods. Applied Economics, 42(16), 2063–2079.

Kyvik, S. (2004). Structural changes in higher education systems in Western Europe. Higher education in Europe, 29(3), 393–409.

Olivares, M., & Wetzel, H. (2011). Competing in the Higher Education Market: Empirical Evidence for Economies of Scale and Scope in German Higher Education Institutions. CESifo Economic Studies, 60(4), 653–680.

Rhaiem, M. (2017). Measurement and determinants of academic research efficiency: a systematic review of the evidence. Scientometrics, 110(2), 581–615.

Sadlak, J. (1978). Efficiency in higher education—concepts and problems. Higher Education, 7(2), 213–220.

Theune, K. (2015). The working status of students and time to degree at German universities. Higher Education, 70(4), 725–752.

Tinto, V. (1975). Dropout from Higher Education: A Theoretical Synthesis of Recent Research. Review of Educational Research, 45(1), 89–125.

Wilson, P. W., & Clemson, S. C. (2013). FEAR: frontier efficiency analysis with R. USA: Department of Economics, Clemson University., 2.

Wissenschaftsrat. Empfehlungen zur Rolle der Fachhochschulen im Hochschulsystem (2010). Berlin. Accessed 30 August 2017