Personality traits as an engine of knowledge: A quantile regression approach

Polemis, Michael (2018): Personality traits as an engine of knowledge: A quantile regression approach.

Abstract

We use a unique micro-level data set to investigate the impact of personality traits on education. To the best of our knowledge this is the first study shedding light on the contribution of each of the Big Five personality traits on the education decision made by the individuals. Our findings, uncover a significant effect of non-cognitive skills on the level of education. Specifically, we argue that the estimated signs of the non-cognitive skills remain stable across the quantiles. It is shown that people with high emotional stability invest in human capital. Lastly, our model survived robustness checks under the inclusion of two aggregated higher-order factors.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: Non-cognitive skills; Big Five personality traits; Education, Quantiles
• Subjects: C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C3 - Multiple or Simultaneous Equation Models ; Multiple Variables > C31 - Cross-Sectional Models ; Spatial Models ; Treatment Effect Models ; Quantile Regressions ; Social Interaction Models; I - Health, Education, and Welfare > I2 - Education and Research Institutions > I21 - Analysis of Education; I - Health, Education, and Welfare > I2 - Education and Research Institutions > I24 - Education and Inequality

References

Buchinsky M. (1998). “Recent advances in quantile regression models”. Journal of Human Resources, 33(1), 88–126.

Cobb-Clark, D.A., Schurer S. (2012). “The stability of big-five personality traits”, Economics Letters, 115(1): 11-15.

Distante, R., Petrella, I., and Santoro, E. (2018). “Gibrat’s law and quantile regressions: An application to firm growth”, Economics Letters, 164: 5–9

Dwan, T.,Ownsworth, T. (2017). “The Big Five personality factors and psychological well-being following stroke: a systematic review”. Disability and Rehabilitation: 1–12. doi:10.1080/09638288.2017.1419382

Friedman, Schustack, Howard and Miriam (2016). Personality: Classic theories and modern research. Pearson.

Halkos, G., and Polemis, M (2018). “Does market structure trigger efficiency? Evidence for the USA before and after the financial crisis” Munich Personal RePEc Archive, MPRA Paper No. 84511.

Heckman, J,. Pinto, R., and Savelyev, P. (2013). “Understanding the Mechanisms through Which an Influential Early Childhood Program Boosted Adult Outcomes”. American Economic Review, 103(6):2052-2086.

Hoeschler P., Balestra S., Backes-Gellner U., (2018). “The development of non-cognitive skills in adolescence”. Economics Letters. 163: 40-45.

Jones M.C. (1992). Estimating densities, quantiles, quantiles densities and density quantiles. Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics, 44(4), 721-727.

Koenker R. (2005). Quantile regression. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Koenker, R., Bassett, G. Jr (1978). “Regression Quantiles”. Econometrica 46(1): 33-50,

Machado, J.A.F., Mata, J., (2000). “Box–Cox quantile regression and the distribution of firm sizes”. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 15 (3): 253–274.

Raymundo M Campos-Vazquez and Eduardo M Medina-Cortina and Roberto Velez-Grajales, (2018) ''Cognitive ability and economic preferences: evidence from survey and experimental data in Mexico'', Economics Bulletin, 38(3): 1406-1414

Schafer K.C., Schwiebert J. (2018). “The impact of personality traits on wage growth and the gender wage gap”. Bulletin of Economic Research. 70(1): 0307-3378.

Wenqi W. et al. (2017). “Regional ambient temperature is associated with human personality”. Nature Human Behaviour. 1: 890–895.