MAO TAKONGMO, Charles Olivier (2019): Keynesian Models, Detrending, and the Method of Moments.
PDF
MPRA_paper_91709.pdf Download (504kB) |
Abstract
One important question in the Keynesian literature is whether we should detrend data when estimating the parameters of a Keynesian model using the moment method. It has been common in the literature to detrend data in the same way the model is detrended. Doing so works relatively well with linear models, in part because in such a case the information that disappears from the data after the detrending process is usually related to the parameters that also disappear from the detrended model. Unfortunately, in heavy non-linear Keynesian models, parameters rarely disappear from detrended models, but information does disappear from the detrended data. Using a simple real business cycle model, we show that both the moment method estimators of parameters and the estimated responses of endogenous variables to a technological shock can be seriously inaccurate when the data used in the estimation process are detrended. Using a dynamic stochastic general equilibrium model and U.S. data, we show that detrending the data before estimating the parameters may result in a seriously misleading response of endogeneous variables to monetary shocks. We suggest building the moment conditions using raw data, irrespective of the trend observed in the data.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Keynesian Models, Detrending, and the Method of Moments |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | RBC models, DSGE models, Trend. |
Subjects: | C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C1 - Econometric and Statistical Methods and Methodology: General > C12 - Hypothesis Testing: General C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C1 - Econometric and Statistical Methods and Methodology: General > C13 - Estimation: General C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C1 - Econometric and Statistical Methods and Methodology: General > C15 - Statistical Simulation Methods: General E - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics > E1 - General Aggregative Models > E17 - Forecasting and Simulation: Models and Applications E - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics > E5 - Monetary Policy, Central Banking, and the Supply of Money and Credit > E51 - Money Supply ; Credit ; Money Multipliers |
Item ID: | 91709 |
Depositing User: | Dr Charles Olivier MAO TAKONGMO |
Date Deposited: | 28 Jan 2019 10:41 |
Last Modified: | 29 Sep 2019 19:58 |
References: | Amano, R., Ambler, S. & Rebei, N. (2007). The macroeconomic effects of non-zero trend inflation. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, 39(7), 1821 1838. Burnside, C. (1998). Detrending and business cycle facts: A comment. Journal of Monetary Economics, 41(3), 513 532. Calvo, G. A. (1983). Staggered prices in a utility-maximizing framework. Journal of monetary Economics, 12(3), 383 398. Canova, F. (1998). Detrending and business cycle facts. Journal of monetary economics, 41(3), 475 512. Christiano, L., Eichenbaum, M. & Rebelo, S. (2011). When is the government spending multiplier large? Journal of Political Economy, 119(1), 78 121. Christiano, L. J. & Den Haan, W. J. (1996). Small-sample properties of GMM for business-cycle analysis. Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, 14(3), 309 327. Christiano, L. J. & Eichenbaum, M. (1992). Current real-business-cycle theories and aggregate labor-market uctuations. The American Economic Review, 430 450. Cogley, T. (2001). Estimating and testing rational expectations models when the trend specification is uncertain. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 25(10), 1485 1525. Collard, F. & Juillard, M. (2001). A higher-order taylor expansion approach to simulation of stochastic forward-looking models with an application to a nonlinear phillips curve model. Computational Economics, 17(2-3), 125 139. Del Negro, M., Schorfheide, F., Smets, F. & Wouters, R. (2007). On the t of new keynesian models. Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, 25(2), 123 143. Dixit, A. K. & Stiglitz, J. E. (1977). Monopolistic competition and optimum product diversity. The American Economic Review, 297 308. Drautzburg, T. & Uhlig, H. (2011). Fiscal stimulus and distortionary taxation (Tech. Rep.). National Bureau of Economic Research. Gorodnichenko, Y. & Ng, S. (2010). Estimation of DSGE models when the data are persistent. Journal of Monetary Economics, 57(3), 325 340. Hall, A. R. (2005). Generalized method of moments. Oxford University Press Oxford. Hansen, G. D. (1985). Indivisible labor and the business cycle. Journal of monetary Economics, 16(3), 309 327. Hansen, L. P. (1982). Large sample properties of generalized method of moments estimators. Econometrica, 1029 1054. Hodrick, R. J. & Prescott, E. C. (1997). Postwar us business cycles: an empirical investigation. Journal of Money, credit, and Banking, 1 16. Ireland, P. N. (2004). Technology shocks in the new keynesian model. Review of Economics and Statistics, 86(4), 923 936. Iskrev, N. (2008). Evaluating the information matrix in linearized DSGE models. Economics Letters, 99(3), 607 610. Iskrev, N. (2010). Local identification in DSGE models. Journal of Monetary Economics, 57(2), 189 202. Judd, K. L. (1998). Numerical methods in economics. MIT press. King, R. G., Plosser, C. I. & Rebelo, S. T. (1988). Production, growth and business cycles: I. the basic neoclassical model. Journal of monetary Economics, 21(2), 195 232. Kydland, F. E. & Prescott, E. C. (1982). Time to build and aggregate fluctuations. Econometrica, 1345 1370. Lubik, T. A. & Schorfheide, F. (2004). Testing for indeterminacy: an application to us monetary policy. American Economic Review, 190 217. Mao Takongmo, C. O. (2017). Government-spending multipliers and the zero lower bound in an open economy. Review of International Economics, 25(5), 1046 1077. McGrattan, E. R., Rogerson, R. & Wright, R. (1997). An equilibrium model of the business cycle with household production and fiscal policy. International Economic Review, 267 290. Rothenberg, T. J. (1971). Identification in parametric models. Econometrica, 577 591. Schmitt-Grohé, S. & Uribe, M. (2004). Solving dynamic general equilibrium models using a second-order approximation to the policy function. Journal of economic dynamics and control, 28(4), 755 775. Singleton, K. J. (1988). Econometric issues in the analysis of equilibrium business cycle models. Journal of Monetary Economics, 21(2), 361 386. Smets, F. & Wouters, R. (2003). An estimated dynamic stochastic general equilibrium model of the euro area. Journal of the European economic association, 1(5), 1123 1175. Smets, F. & Wouters, R. (2007). Shocks and frictions in us business cycles: A bayesian DSGE approach. The American Economic Review, 97(3), 586 606. Uhlig, H. (1995). A toolkit for analyzing nonlinear dynamic stochastic models easily (Tech. Rep.). Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis. Wallis, K. F. (1974). Seasonal adjustment and relations between variables. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 69(345), 18 31. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/91709 |