Innovation and FDI: Does the Target of Intellectual Property Rights Matter?

Chen, Hung-Ju (2019): Innovation and FDI: Does the Target of Intellectual Property Rights Matter?

Abstract

This paper develops a North-South product-cycle model with innovation and foreign direct investment (FDI) to analyze the influences from strengthening intellectual property rights (IPR) protection. Innovation occurs in the North while imitation happens in the South. Southern firms can imitate either goods produced in the North or goods produced by multinationals in the South. We find that if the target of strengthening IPR protection is Northern-produced goods, then such a policy change reduces the innovation rate and raises the North-South relative wage in the long run. However, the effects on the long-run innovation rate and the North-South relative wage reverse if its target is Southern-produced goods by multinationals. As for the pattern of production, strengthening IPR protection raises the long-run extents of FDI and Southern production imitating goods produced by multinationals while reducing the long-run extents of Northern production and Southern production imitating goods produced in the North, regardless of the target of stronger IPR protection. In addition to examining the long-run effects of strengthening IPR protection, we also analyze its effects during the transitional dynamics. The quantitative analysis indicates that the two strengthening-IPR-protection policies cause welfare losses for both Northern and Southern consumers if we consider the accumulated effects during the transitional dynamics.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: FDI; Imitation; Innovation; IPR; R&D.
• Subjects: E - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics > E5 - Monetary Policy, Central Banking, and the Supply of Money and Credit > E52 - Monetary Policy; F - International Economics > F2 - International Factor Movements and International Business > F23 - Multinational Firms ; International Business; O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O3 - Innovation ; Research and Development ; Technological Change ; Intellectual Property Rights > O31 - Innovation and Invention: Processes and Incentives

References

Aghion, P., Howitt, P., 2009. Endogenous growth theory. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.

Chen, H.-J., 2015a. Intellectual Property Rights and Skills Accumulation: A Product-cycle Model of FDI and Outsourcing. Journal of Macroeconomics 46, 328-343.

Chen, H.-J., 2015b. Innovation and intellectual property rights in a product-cycle model of skills accumulation. Review of International Economics 23, 320-344.

Chen, H.-J., 2018. Innovation and imitation: Effects of intellectual property rights in a product-cycle model of skills accumulation. Macroeconomic Dynamics 22, 1475-1509.

Chu, A.C., Peng, S.-K., 2011. International intellectual property rights: Effects on growth, welfare and income inequality. Journal of Macroeconomics 33, 276-287.

Cozzi, G., Impullitti, G., 2016. Globalization and wage polarization. The Review of Economics and Statistics 98, 984-1000.

Dinopoulos, E., Segerstrom, P., 1999. A Schumpeterian model of protection and relative wages. American Economic Review 89, 450-472.

Dinopoulos, E., Segerstrom, P., 2010. Intellectual property rights, multinational firms and economic growth. Journal of Development Economics 92, 13-27.

Glass, A.J., Saggi, K., 2001. Innovation and wage effects of international outsourcing. European Economic Review 45, 67-86.

Glass, A.J., Saggi, K., 2002. Intellectual property rights and foreign direct investment. Journal of International Economics 56, 387-410.

Glass, A.J., 2004. Outsourcing under imperfect protection of intellectual property. Review of International Economics 12, 867-884.

Glass, A.J., Wu, X., 2007. Intellectual property rights and quality improvement. Journal of Development Economics 82, 393-415.

Grossman, G.M., Helpman, E., 1991a. Quality ladders and product cycles. Quarterly Journal of Economics 106, 557-586.

Grossman, G.M., Helpman, E., 1991b. Endogenous product cycles. Economic Journal 101, 1214-1229.

Grossman, G.M., Helpman, E., 1991c. Innovation and growth in the global economy. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.

Grossman, G.M., Helpman, E., 1991d. Quality ladders in the theory of growth. Review of Economic Studies 58, 43-61.

Lin, H.C., 2019. North-South harmonization of intellectual property rights: Who wins, who loses? DOI: 10.13140/RG.2.2.24277.22244

Parello, C.P., 2008. A North-South model of intellectual property rights protection and skill accumulation. Journal of Development Economics 85, 253-281.

Segerstrom, P., 1998. Endogenous growth without scale effects. American Economic Review 88, 1290-1310.

Segerstrom, P., Anant, T., Dinopoulos, E., 1990. A Schumpeterian model of the product life cycle. American Economic Review 80, 1077-1091.

Tanaka, H., Iwaisako, T., 2014. Intellectual property rights and foreign direct investment: A welfare analysis. European Economic Review 67, 107-124.

Tanaka, H., Iwaisako, T., Futagami, K., 2007. Dynamic analysis of innovation and international transfer of technology through licensing. Journal of International Economics 73, 189-212.

Vernon, R., 1966. International investment and international trade in the product cycle. Quarterly Journal of Economics 80, 190-20.