The growth conundrum: Paul Romer’s endogenous growth

Schilirò, Daniele (2019): The growth conundrum: Paul Romer’s endogenous growth. Published in: International Business Research , Vol. 12, No. 10 (September 2019): -10.

Abstract

The explanation and causes of economic growth, the problem of convergence of per capita income among different economies, the low productivity growth in many advanced economies, and the presence of disrupting technological innovations remain at th e center of the debate among economists. The present contribution analyzes the endogenous growth theory of Paul Romer and discusses its features and content through Romer’s main works on the topic. This study on Romer’s work highlights the existence and im portance of increasing returns in the process of growth, the key role of knowledge, the ideas as non rival goods, the existence of externalities, the endogeneity of technological change, and the primary role of human capital, especially in research activity. Institutions, such as property rights are important as well. The state also has a decisive role in education and the research sector. Another relevant aspect is that economic growth and technological change are closely interconnected; they cannot be separated. Romer’s theory of endogenous technological change ties the development of new ideas and economic growth to the number of people working in the knowledge sector. New ideas, being non rival and partially excludable, are fundamental for growth since they make everyone producing physical goods and services more productive. Finally, Romer’s endogenous growth highlights the factors that provide incentives for knowledge creation; thus, his theory can also be considered a significant contribution to the theory of the knowledge-based economy.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: endogenous growth; technical change; human capital; knowledge accumulation; externalities; property rights
• Subjects: D - Microeconomics > D6 - Welfare Economics > D62 - Externalities; I - Health, Education, and Welfare > I2 - Education and Research Institutions > I20 - General; J - Labor and Demographic Economics > J2 - Demand and Supply of Labor > J24 - Human Capital ; Skills ; Occupational Choice ; Labor Productivity; O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O3 - Innovation ; Research and Development ; Technological Change ; Intellectual Property Rights > O30 - General; O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O4 - Economic Growth and Aggregate Productivity > O40 - General

References

[1] Acemoglou, D., Johnson, S., & Robinson, J. A. (2005). Institutions as a fundamental cause of long-run growth. In P. Aghion and S. N. Durlauf (Eds.), Handbook of economic growth (Vol. IA). Amsterdam: Elsevier, 386-472.

[2] Arrow, K. (1962). The economics implications of learning by doing. Review of Economic Studies, 29(3), 155–173.

[3] Barro, R. J. (1991). A cross-country study of growth, saving, and government. In B. Douglas Bernheimand and John Shoven (Eds.), National Saving and Economic Performance. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 269–301.

[4] Barro, R. J., & Sala-i-Martin, X. (1992). Convergence. Journal of Political Economy, 100 (2), 223–251.

[5] Barro, R., & Sala-i-Martin, X. (2003). Economic Growth (2nd ed.). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

[6] Capolupo, R. (2009). The new growth theories and their empirics after twenty years. Economics: The Open-Access, Open-Assessment E-Journal, 3 (2009-1), 1–72.

[7] Cass, D. (1965). Optimum growth in an aggregative model of capital accumulation. Review of Economic Studies, 32(3), 233–240.

[8] Dixit, A. & Stiglitz, J. E. (1977). Monopolistic competition and optimum product diversity. American Economic Review, 67(3), 297-308.

[9] Easterly, W., & Levine, R. (2001). It’s not factor accumulation: Stylized facts and growth. World Bank Economic Review, 15(2), 177–219.

[10] Ethier, W. J. (1982). National and international returns to scale in the modern theory of international trade. American Economic Review, 72(3), 389–405.

[11] Grossman, G. M. & Helpman, E. (1989). Product development and international trade. Journal of Political Economy, 97(6), 1261–1283.

[12] Grossman, G. M. & Helpman, E. (1990). Comparative advantage and long-run growth. American Economic Review, 80(4), 796–815.

[13] Grossman, G. M. & Helpman, E. (1991). Quality ladders in the theory of growth. The Review of Economic Studies, 58(1), 43–61.

[14] Grossman, G. M. & Helpman, E. (1994). Endogenous innovation in the theory of growth. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 8(1), 23-44.

[15] Helpman, E., & Krugman, P. R. (1985). Market structure and foreign trade: Increasing returns, imperfect competition, and the international economy. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.

[16] Hall, R. E., & Jones, C. I. (1999). Why do some countries more output produce so much more output per worker than others? Quarterly Journal of Economics, 114(1), 83–116.

[17] Kaldor, N. (1957). A model of economic growth. Economic Journal, 67(268), 591–624.

[18] Koopmans, T. C. (1965). On the concept of optimal economic growth. In The economic approach to development planning (pp. 225–287). Chicago, Ill.: Rand McNally.

[19] Jones, C. I. (2019). Paul Romer: Ideas, nonrivalry, endogenous growth. The Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 121(3), 859–833.

[20] Lucas, R. (1988). On the mechanism of economic development, Journal of Monetary Economics, 22(1), 3–42.

[21] Mankiw, N. G., Romer, D., & Weil, D. N. (1992). A contribution to the empirics of economic growth. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, CVII(2), 407–437.

[22] Pack, H. (1994). Endogenous growth theory: Intellectual appeal and empirical shortcomings. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 8(1), 55–72.

[23] Quah, D. T. (1993). Empirical cross-section dynamics for economic growth. European Economic Review, 37(2–3), 426–434.

[24] Ramsey, F. (1928). A mathematical theory of saving. Economic Journal, 38(152), 543–559.

[25] Rivera-Batiz, L. A., Romer, P. (1991). Economic integration and endogenous growth. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 106(2), 531–555.

[26] Romer, P. (1986a). Increasing returns and long-run growth. Journal of Political Economy, 94(5), 1002–1037.

[27] Romer, P. (1986b). Cake eating, chattering and jumps: Existence results for variational problems. Econometrica, 54(4), 897–908.

[28] Romer, P. (1987). Growth based on increasing returns due to specialization. American Economic Review, 77(2), 56–62.

[29] Romer, P. (1990). Endogenous technological change. Journal of Political Economy, 98(5), Part 2, S71–S102.

[30] Romer, P. (1993). Ideas gaps and object gaps in economic development. Journal of Monetary Economics, 32(3), 543–573.

[31] Romer, P. (1994). The origins of endogenous growth. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 8(1), 3–22.

[32] Schilirò, D. (2012). Knowledge-based economies and the institutional environment. Theoretical and Practical Research in Economic Fields, 3(1), 42–50.

[33] Schilirò, D. (2017). A glance at Solow’s growth theory. Journal of Mathematical Economics and Finance, 3(2), 83–103.

[34] Schumpeter, J. A. (1942). Capitalism, socialism and democracy. New York, NY: Harper.

[35] Solow, R. (1956). A contribution to the theory of economic growth. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 70(1), 65–94. https://doi.org/10.2307/1884513

[36] Solow, R. (1957). Technical change and the aggregate production function. Review of Economics and Statistics. 39(3), 312–320. doi:10.2307/1926047

[37] Temple, J. (1999). The new growth evidence. Journal of Economic Literature, 37(1), 112–156. doi:10.1257/jel.37.1.112

[38] Young, A. [Allyn]. (1928). Increasing returns and economic progress. Economic Journal, 38(152), 527–542.

[39] Young, A. [Alwyn]. (1991). Learning by doing and the dynamic effects of international trade. Quarterly Journal of Economics 106(2), 369–406.