General Constrained Dynamic Models in Economics - General Dynamic Theory of Economic Variables - Beyond Walras and Keynes

Glötzl, Erhard and Glötzl, Florentin and Richters, Oliver and Binter, Lucas (2023): General Constrained Dynamic Models in Economics - General Dynamic Theory of Economic Variables - Beyond Walras and Keynes.

Abstract

For more than 100 years economists have tried to describe economics in analogy to physics, more precisely to classical Newtonian mechanics. The development of the Neoclassical General Equilibrium Theory has to be understood as the result of these efforts. But there are many reasons why General Equilibrium Theory is inadequate: 1. No genuine dynamics. 2. The assumption of the existence of utility functions and the possibility to aggregate them to one “master” utility function. 3. The impossibility to describe situations as in “Prisoners Dilemma”, where individual optimization does not lead to a collective optimum. This book aims at overcoming these problems. It illustrates how not only equilibria of economic systems, but also the general dynamics of these systems can be described in close analogy to classical mechanics. To this end, this book makes the case for an approach based on the concept of constrained dynamics, analyzing the economy from the perspective of “economic forces” and “economic power” based on the concept of physical forces and the reciprocal value of mass. Realizing that accounting identities constitute constraints in the economy, the concept of constrained dynamics, which is part of the standard models of classical mechanics, can be applied to economics. Therefore, it is reasonable to denote such models as General Constraint Dynamic Models (GCD-Models) Such a framework allows understanding both Keynesian and neoclassical models as special cases of GCD-Models in which the power relationships with respect to certain variables are one-sided. As mixed power relationships occur more frequently in reality than purely one-sided power constellations, GCD-models are better suited to describe the economy than standard Keynesian or Neoclassic models. A GCD-model can be understood as “Continuous Time”, “Stock Flow Consistent”, “Microfounded”, where the behaviour of the agents is described with a general differential equation for every agent. In the special case where the differential equations can be described with utility functions, the behaviour of every agent can be understood as an individual optimization strategy. He thus seeks to maximize his utility. However, while the core assumption of neoclassical models is that due to the “invisible hand” such egoistic individual behaviour leads to an optimal result for all agents, reality is often defined by “Prisoners Dilemma” situations, in which individual optimization leads to the worst outcome for all. One advantage of GCD-models over standard models is that they are able to describe also such situations, where an individual optimization strategy does not lead to an optimum result for all agents. In conclusion, the big merit and effort of Newton was, to formalize the right terms (physical force, inertial mass, change of velocity) and to set them into the right relation. Analogously the appropriate terms of economics are economic force, economic power and change of variables. GCD-Models allow formalizing them and setting them into the right relation to each other.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: Stephen Smale, Problem 8, macroeconomic models, constraint dynamics, GCD, DSGE, out-of-equilibrium dynamics, Lagrangian mechanics, stock flow consistent, SFC, demand shock, supply shock, price shock, intertemporal utility function
• Subjects: A - General Economics and Teaching > A1 - General Economics > A12 - Relation of Economics to Other Disciplines; B - History of Economic Thought, Methodology, and Heterodox Approaches > B1 - History of Economic Thought through 1925 > B13 - Neoclassical through 1925 (Austrian, Marshallian, Walrasian, Stockholm School); B - History of Economic Thought, Methodology, and Heterodox Approaches > B4 - Economic Methodology > B41 - Economic Methodology; B - History of Economic Thought, Methodology, and Heterodox Approaches > B5 - Current Heterodox Approaches > B59 - Other; C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C0 - General > C02 - Mathematical Methods; C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C3 - Multiple or Simultaneous Equation Models ; Multiple Variables > C30 - General; C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C5 - Econometric Modeling > C54 - Quantitative Policy Modeling; C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C6 - Mathematical Methods ; Programming Models ; Mathematical and Simulation Modeling > C60 - General; E - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics > E1 - General Aggregative Models > E10 - General

References

Arrow, Kenneth J., und Gerard Debreu. 1954. „Existence of an Equilibrium for a Competitive Economy“. Econometrica 22 (3): 265–90.

BarBosa-FilHo, N. N. H. 2004. „A Simple Model of Demand-Led Growth and Income Distribution“. Revista EconomiA 5 (3): 17–154.

Barbosa-Filho, Nelson H. 2004. „A simple model of demand-led growth and income distribution“. Revista Economia 5 (3): 117–54. https://anpec.org.br/revista/vol5/vol5n3p117_154.pdf.

Blanchard, Olivier, und Gerhard Illing. 2009. Makroökonomie. München [u.a.]: Pearson Studium.

Böhm-Bawerk, Eugen. 1914. „Macht oder ökonomisches Gesetz?“ Zeitschrift für Volkswirtschaft, Sozialpolitik und Verwaltung 23: 205–71.

Cooper, J. B., und T. Russell. 2011. „On the mathematics of thermodynamics“. http://arxiv.org/abs/1102.1540.

Cooper, James B. 2010. „On Paul Samuelson, Lind and the holy grail equation“. Internationale Mathematische Nachrichten 213: 1–5.

Cvitanic, Jaksa, und Jianfeng Zhang. 2014. Contract Theory in Continuous-Time Models. Berlin: Springer Berlin.

Flannery, Martin Raymond. 2011. „D’Alembert–Lagrange analytical dynamics for nonholonomic systems“. Journal of Mathematical Physics 52 (3): 032705. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3559128.

Foley, Duncan K. 1986. Understanding Capital : Marx’s Economic Theory. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.

Giza, Wojciech. 2013. „Adam Smiths unsichtbare Hand und das Gefangenendilemma“. Orientierungen zur Wirtschafts- und Gesellschaftspolitik 135 (1): 47–50.

Glötzl, Erhard. 1999. „Das Wechselfieber der Volkswirtschaften: Anamnese, Diagnose, Therapie“. Zeitschrift für Sozialökonomie 36: 9–15. https://drive.google.com/file/d/1-XlWpalDwDdVfZYUvB1FAZG-51f0Ib-_/view.

———. 2009. „Über die langfristige Entwicklung von Schulden und Einkommen“. In Die Finanzkrise als Chance, herausgegeben von Franz Hörmann und Herbert R. Haeseler, 115–42. Orac Wirtschaftspraxis. Wien: LexisNexis. https://drive.google.com/file/d/1SVBzNSHRX3IpewuiQ-yE1RVlzujR1vdt/view?usp=sharing.

———. 2015. „Why and How to overcome General Equilibrium Theory“. MPRA Paper 66265. https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/66265/1/MPRA_paper_66265.pdf.

———. 2018. „D´Alembert’s Principle and equivalent or similar principles“. https://docs.google.com/document/d/1nCQ4IfX3VTqCybo1AhXZQCygEYD4DIn4/edit.

———. 2022. „A simple General Constrained Dynamics (GCD) model for demand, supply and price shocks“. https://www.dropbox.com/s/2h8o3rg0r4b008b/Macroeconomic%20GCD%20Modelle%20A%2CB%2CC%20FINAL%20Version%202.docx?dl=0.

———. 2023a. The Theory of the Evolution of Everything: From the Origin of Life to the Market Economy - Beyond Darwin - On the Origin of Species in a Broader Sense. Principia.

———. 2023b. Tractatus logico oeconomicus - Theorie der Finanzkrisen - Ökonomie in der Sprache der Logik. 1. Aufl. Bd. 3. Principia.

Glötzl, Erhard, und Lucas Binter. 2022. „GCDconfigurator, GitHub“. https://github.com/lbinter/gcd.

Glötzl, Erhard, Florentin Glötzl, und Oliver Richters. 2019. „From Constrained Optimization to Constrained Dynamics: Extending Analogies between Economics and Mechanics“. Journal of Economic Interaction and Coordination 14 (3): 623–42. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11403-019-00252-7.

Glötzl, Erhard, und Oliver Richters. 2021a. „Analytical Helmholtz Decomposition and Potential Functions for many n-dimensional unbounded vector fields“. https://arxiv.org/abs/2102.09556.

———. 2021b. „Helmholtz Decomposition and Rotation Potentials in n-dimensional Cartesian Coordinates“. https://arxiv.org/abs/2012.13157v2.

Godley, Wynne, und M. Lavoie. 2012. Monetary economics: an integrated approach to credit, money, income, production and wealth. 2nd ed. Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire ; New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

Kaldor, Nicholas. 1956. „Alternative Theories of Distribution“. The Review of Economic Studies 23 (2): 83–100.

Kümmel, Reiner. 2011. The Second Law of Economics: Energy, Entropy, and the Origins of Wealth. New York: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-9365-6.

Marglin, Stephen A. 1987. Growth, Distribution and Prices. Harvard Economic Studies 155. Harvard University Press. http://books.google.com.au/books/about/Growth_Distribution_and_Prices.html?id=ruIjuKgzoL4C.

Mirowski, Philip. 1989. More Heat than Light: Economics as Social Physics, Physics as Nature’s Economics. Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press.

Nash, John. 1951. „Non-Cooperative Games“. The Annals of Mathematics 54 (2): 286. https://doi.org/10.2307/1969529.

Redman, Deborah. 1993. „Adam Smith and Isaac Newton“. Scottish Journal of Political Economy 40 (2). http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1467-9485.1993.tb00651.x/abstract.

Richters, Oliver. 2021. „Modeling the Out-of-Equilibrium Dynamics of Bounded Rationality and Economic Constraints“. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 188 (August): 846–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2021.06.005.

Richters, Oliver, und Erhard Glötzl. 2020. „Modeling Economic Forces, Power Relations, and Stock-Flow Consistency: A General Constrained Dynamics Approach“. Journal of Post Keynesian Economics 43 (2): 281–97. https://doi.org/10.1080/01603477.2020.1713008.

Rothschild, Kurt W. 2002a. „The absence of power in contemporary economic theory“. The Journal of Socio-Economics 31 (5): 433–42.

———. 2002b. „The absence of power in contemporary economic theory“. The Journal of Socio-Economics 31 (5): 433–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1053-5357(02)00207-X.

Russell, Bertrand. 1938. Power: A New Social Analysis. London: Goerge Allen & Unwin.

Sannikov, Yuliy. 2007. „Games with Imperfectly Observable Actions in Continuous Time“. Econometrica 75 (5): 1285–1329. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0262.2007.00795.x.

Sen, Amartya K. 1963. „Neo-Classical and Neo-Keynesian Theories of Distribution“. Economic Record 39 (85): 53–64. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-4932.1963.tb01459.x.

Smale Institute. 2003. „Smale Institute Mathematics & Computation“. 2003. http://www.smaleinstitute.com/problem.html.

Smale, Steve. 1991. „Dynamics Retrospective: Great Problems, Attempts That Failed“. Physica D: Nonlinear Phenomena 51 (1–3): 267–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-2789(91)90238-5.

———. 1997. „Mathematical Problems for the Next Century“. Fields Institute, Toronto, Juni. http://www.smaleinstitute.org/problem.html.

———. 1998. „Mathematical problems for the next century“, reprinted in V. Arnold, M. Atiyah, P. Lax, B. Mazur: Mathematics: Frontiers and Perspectives 2000, American Mathematical Society 2000, 2: 7–15.

Smith, Adam. 1776. An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations. 5th, 1904. Aufl. London: Methuen & Co., Ltd.

———. 1795. „Essays on Philosophical Subjects“. In History of Astronomy. London.

Smith, Eric, und Duncan K. Foley. 2008. „Classical Thermodynamics and Economic General Equilibrium Theory“. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control 32 (1): 7–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jedc.2007.01.020.

Taylor, Lance. 1991. Income Distribution, Inflation, and Growth: Lectures on Structuralist Macroeconomic Theory. MIT Press.

Walras, Léon. 1874. Éléments d’économie politique pure; ou, Théorie de la richesse sociale. Lausanne.

Yuliy Sannikov. 2012. In 10th World Congress of Econometric Society, Princeton University.