Benazzo, Piero (2010): Equity Criteria as Instrument to Ensure Sustainability of Pareto or Kaldor-Hicks Efficiency: A Correlation Hidden by Sources of Confounding as Key for Sorting Out the Global Economic Crisis. Published in: Economics & Management , Vol. 15, (22 April 2010): pp. 12-17.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_23678.pdf Download (45kB) | Preview |
Abstract
The hypothesis is that Pareto and Kaldor-Hicks Efficiency have an aspect of sustainability in relation to inequality. The analysis finds efficient situations reached increasing inequality as diminishing in the long term effective demand in a larger measure than counterbalancing increases thanks to total factor productivity growth. Equity and efficiency in welfare economics, rather than being quite contrasting objectives, are as such related and mutually necessary. As such countries are called to implement redistributive policies together with Kaldor-Hicks movements. These would make some parts of the economic agents less well off, while they would reinstate effective demand on the demand side. This latter increases output and wealth throughout the economy for all economic agents in general. Redistributive policies increase also imports, benefiting third countries and remunerating therefore their potential free-rider behaviour. The concerned demand side policies, requiring cooperation and redistribution, call the international institutions to coordinate their action for harmonizing such policies and restrain free-rider behaviour.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Equity Criteria as Instrument to Ensure Sustainability of Pareto or Kaldor-Hicks Efficiency: A Correlation Hidden by Sources of Confounding as Key for Sorting Out the Global Economic Crisis |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | paradigm; inequality; total factor productivity growth; confounding; pareto efficiency; kaldor-hicks efficiency; cost-benefit analysis; effective demand; sustainability; sustainable development; global economy |
Subjects: | E - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics > E1 - General Aggregative Models > E12 - Keynes ; Keynesian ; Post-Keynesian D - Microeconomics > D6 - Welfare Economics > D63 - Equity, Justice, Inequality, and Other Normative Criteria and Measurement I - Health, Education, and Welfare > I3 - Welfare, Well-Being, and Poverty > I31 - General Welfare, Well-Being D - Microeconomics > D3 - Distribution > D33 - Factor Income Distribution C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C0 - General O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O3 - Innovation ; Research and Development ; Technological Change ; Intellectual Property Rights > O33 - Technological Change: Choices and Consequences ; Diffusion Processes E - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics > E0 - General > E01 - Measurement and Data on National Income and Product Accounts and Wealth ; Environmental Accounts E - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics > E2 - Consumption, Saving, Production, Investment, Labor Markets, and Informal Economy > E21 - Consumption ; Saving ; Wealth D - Microeconomics > D3 - Distribution > D31 - Personal Income, Wealth, and Their Distributions D - Microeconomics > D6 - Welfare Economics > D61 - Allocative Efficiency ; Cost-Benefit Analysis A - General Economics and Teaching > A1 - General Economics > A10 - General O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O1 - Economic Development > O11 - Macroeconomic Analyses of Economic Development B - History of Economic Thought, Methodology, and Heterodox Approaches > B4 - Economic Methodology > B40 - General J - Labor and Demographic Economics > J3 - Wages, Compensation, and Labor Costs > J31 - Wage Level and Structure ; Wage Differentials O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O4 - Economic Growth and Aggregate Productivity > O43 - Institutions and Growth F - International Economics > F0 - General > F02 - International Economic Order and Integration E - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics > E1 - General Aggregative Models > E19 - Other O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O1 - Economic Development > O12 - Microeconomic Analyses of Economic Development |
Item ID: | 23678 |
Depositing User: | Piero Benazzo |
Date Deposited: | 29 Jul 2010 00:52 |
Last Modified: | 27 Sep 2019 16:42 |
References: | Barro, Robert J. (2008). Inequality and Growth Revisited. Working Papers on Regional Economic Integration 11, Asian Development Bank. Benazzo, Piero (2009). Unraveling the World Crisis: Redistribution versus Public Expenditure. Working paper, www.ssrn.com/abstract=1519811. Benazzo, Piero (2010). Confounding in the Interaction of the Global Financial Crisis with the Real Sector: Economic Fundamentals and effect of Redistribution on the Keynesian Multiplier. Conference Paper – International Conference on Critical Issues in Business and Economics, Gümüshane, Turkey, November 2009, www.ssrn.com/abstract=1553048. Bhaduri, Amit, (2003). Structural Change and Economic Development: on the Relative Roles of Effective Demand and the Price Mechanism in a ‘Dual’ Economy”. Rethinking Development Economics, edited by Ha-Joon Chang (Antherm Press). Caselli, Francesco & Gennaioli, Nicola (2005). Credit Constraints, Competition, and Meritocracy. Journal of the European Economic Association, MIT Press, vol. 3(2-3), pages 679-689, 04/05. Galbraith, James K. (2008). Inequality, unemployment and growth: New measures for old controversies. Journal of Economic Inequality. Springer, Vol. 7(2), pages 189-206, June. Krugman, Paul R. (2007). The conscience of a liberal. W.W. Norton & Co., New York. Lewis, W. Arthur (1954). Economic development with unlimited supplies of labour. Manchester School 22: 139- 191. Sen, Amartya (1981). Ingredients of Famine Analysis: Availability and Entitlements. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, MIT Press, vol. 96(3), pages 433-64, August. Sylos Labini, Paolo (1981). On the concept of the optimum rate of profit. Essays in Honour of Edward Lipinski, (North Holland, Amsterdam). Zerbe Jr., Richard (2004). Should moral sentiments be incorporated into benefit-cost analysis; An example of longterm discounting,. Policy Sciences, Springer, vol 37(3), pages 305-318, December. Zerbe Jr., Richard O., Bauman, Yoram and Finkle, Aaron (2006). An Aggregate Measure for Benefit Cost Analysis. Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 58(3), pages 449-461, June. Zerbe Jr., Richard O. and Bellas, Allen S. (2006). A Primer for Benefit-Cost Analysis. Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar Publishing, Inc. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/23678 |