Financial Development and Growth: Panel Cointegration Evidence from South-Eastern and Central Europe

Stojkoski, Viktor and Popova, Kristina (2016): Financial Development and Growth: Panel Cointegration Evidence from South-Eastern and Central Europe.

Abstract

Ever since Schumpeter, macroeconomists have argued that financial development has a large and direct effect on the long run wealth of a nation. In this paper, we empirically investigate this relationship for a panel of 16 South-Eastern and Central European countries over the period 1995-2014 by employing a state-of-the-art panel cointegration technique. We find that financial development has a positive effect on the income per capita. The effect is statistically robust to other estimation methods and is economically large since it is almost twice the size of the gross capital formation. Nevertheless, the panel cointegration tests indicate a possibility of an endogenous relationship between the phenomena.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: panel-cointegration, financial development, economic growth
• Subjects: C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C2 - Single Equation Models ; Single Variables > C23 - Panel Data Models ; Spatio-temporal Models; C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C5 - Econometric Modeling > C51 - Model Construction and Estimation; E - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics > E5 - Monetary Policy, Central Banking, and the Supply of Money and Credit > E50 - General; O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O1 - Economic Development > O11 - Macroeconomic Analyses of Economic Development; O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O4 - Economic Growth and Aggregate Productivity > O47 - Empirical Studies of Economic Growth ; Aggregate Productivity ; Cross-Country Output Convergence; O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O5 - Economywide Country Studies > O52 - Europe

References

Arestis, P., & Demetriades, P. (1997). Financial development and economic growth: Assessing the evidence*. The Economic Journal, 107(442), 783-799.

Beck, T., & Levine, R. (2004). Stock markets, banks, and growth: Panel evidence. Journal of Banking & Finance, 28(3), 423-442.

Bittencourt, M. (2012). Financial development and economic growth in Latin America: Is Schumpeter right?. Journal of Policy Modeling, 34(3), 341-355.

Boulila, G., & Trabelsi*, M. (2004). The causality issue in the finance and growth nexus: empirical evidence from Middle East and North African countries. Review of Middle East Economics and Finance, 2(2), 123-138.

Breitung, J. (1999). The local power of some unit root tests for panel data (No. 1999, 69). Discussion Papers, Interdisciplinary Research Project 373: Quantification and Simulation of 13 Economic Processes.

Dudian, M., & Popa, R. A. (2013). Financial development and economic growth in Central and Eastern Europe. Theoretical and Applied Economics, 20(8), 59-68.

De Gregorio, J., & Guidotti, P. E. (1995). Financial development and economic growth. World development, 23(3), 433-448.

Goldsmith, R. (1969). Financial structure and economic development. New Haven: Yale University Pres.

Granger, C. W., & Newbold, P. (1974). Spurious regressions in econometrics. Journal of econometrics, 2(2), 111-120.

Herzer, D., Strulik, H., & Vollmer, S. (2012). The long-run determinants of fertility: one century of demographic change 1900–1999. Journal of Economic Growth, 17(4), 357-385.

Herzer, D., & Vollmer, S. (2012). Inequality and growth: evidence from panel cointegration. The Journal of Economic Inequality, 10(4), 489-503.

Im, K. S., Pesaran, M. H., & Shin, Y. (2003). Testing for unit roots in heterogeneous panels. Journal of econometrics, 115(1), 53-74.

Johansen, S. (1988). Statistical analysis of cointegration vectors. Journal of economic dynamics and control, 12(2), 231-254..

Johansen, S. (2000). Modelling of cointegration in the vector autoregressive model. Economic modelling, 17(3), 359-373.

Jones, C. I. (1995). Time series tests of endogenous growth models. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 495-525.

Kao, C., & Chiang, M. H. (1999). On the estimation and inference of a cointegrated regression in panel data. Available at SSRN 1807931.

Kao, C., & Chiang, M. H. (1999). On the estimation and inference of a cointegrated regression in panel data. Available at SSRN 1807931.

Kar, M., Nazlıoğlu, Ş., & Ağır, H. (2011). Financial development and economic growth nexus in the MENA countries: Bootstrap panel granger causality analysis. Economic Modelling, 28(1), 685-693.

King, R. G., & Levine, R. (1993). Finance and growth: Schumpeter might be right. The quarterly journal of economics, 717-737.

King, R. G., & Levine, R. (1993). Finance, entrepreneurship and growth. Journal of Monetary economics, 32(3), 513-542.

Levine, R., & Renelt, D. (1992). A sensitivity analysis of cross-country growth regressions. The American economic review, 942-963.

Levine, R. (1997). Financial development and economic growth: views and agenda. Journal of economic literature, 688-726.

Levin, A., Lin, C. F., & Chu, C. S. J. (2002). Unit root tests in panel data: asymptotic and finite-sample properties. Journal of econometrics, 108(1), 1-24.

Levine, R. (2005). Finance and growth: theory and evidence. Handbook of economic growth, 1, 865-934.

Lütkepohl, H. (2007). General-to-specific or specific-to-general modelling? An opinion on current econometric terminology. Journal of Econometrics, 136(1), 319-324.

Maddala, G. S., & Wu, S. (1999). A comparative study of unit root tests with panel data and a new simple test. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and statistics, 61(S1), 631-652.

Odhiambo, N. M. (2009). Finance-growth-poverty nexus in South Africa: a dynamic causality linkage. The Journal of Socio-Economics, 38(2), 320-325.

Pedroni, P. (1999). Critical values for cointegration tests in heterogeneous panels with multiple regressors. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and statistics, 61(S1), 653-670.

Pedroni, P. (2000). Fully modified OLS for heterogeneous cointegrated panels. Advances 14 in Econometrics. 15, 93130.

Pedroni, P. (2001). Purchasing power parity tests in cointegrated panels.Review of Economics and Statistics, 83(4), 727-731.

Pedroni, P. (2004). Panel cointegration: asymptotic and finite sample properties of pooled time series tests with an application to the PPP hypothesis. Econometric theory, 20(03), 597-625.

Pedroni, P. (2007). Social capital, barriers to production and capital shares: implications for the importance of parameter heterogeneity from a nonstationary panel approach. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 22(2), 429-451.

Levine, R., & Zervos, S. (1998). Stock markets, banks, and economic growth. American economic review, 537-558.

Rajan, R. G., & Zingales, L. (2003). The great reversals: the politics of financial development in the twentieth century. Journal of financial economics, 69(1), 5-50.

Romer, P. (1989). Endogenous technological change (No. w3210). National Bureau of Economic Research.

Schumpeter, J. A. (1934). The theory of economic development: An inquiry into profits, capital, credit, interest, and the business cycle (Vol. 55). Transaction publishers.

Shan, J., & Morris, A. (2002). Does financial development 'lead' economic growth? International Review of Applied Economics, 16(2), 153-168.

Sinha, D., & Macri, J. (2001). Financial development and economic growth: the case of eight Asian countries.

Stock, J. H., & Watson, M. W. (1988). Testing for common trends. Journal of the American statistical Association, 83(404), 1097-1107.

Yucel, F. (2009). Causal relationships between financial development, trade openness and economic growth: the case of Turkey. Journal of Social sciences, 5(1), 33-42.

Wagner, M., & Hlouskova, J. (2009). The performance of panel cointegration methods: results from a large scale simulation study. Econometric Reviews, 29(2), 182-223.

Wood, A. (1993). Financial development and economic growth in Barbados: causal evidence. Savings and Development, 379-390.