The Mechanism behind Product Differentiation: An Economic Model

Harashima, Taiji (2017): The Mechanism behind Product Differentiation: An Economic Model.

Abstract

The strategy of product differentiation has been viewed as very important in the field of business administration, but it has not necessarily been viewed as an important source of large differences in firms’ profits in the field of economics. In this paper, this apparent contradiction is examined based on the concepts of “ranking preference and value.” In the proposed model, if a product’s implicit rank is higher, households will purchase the product far more often than competing products even if their qualities are almost identical and the tastes of households are uniformly distributed. Even a slight difference in quality can result in a clear difference in implicit ranks and consequently large differences in firms’ profits. Therefore, the effects of differentiation are amplified by ranking preference, and product differentiation efforts are truly very important for firms.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: Product differentiation; Ranking preference; Ranking value; Monopoly power: Monopoly profits; Marketing strategy
• Subjects: D - Microeconomics > D4 - Market Structure, Pricing, and Design > D42 - Monopoly; D - Microeconomics > D4 - Market Structure, Pricing, and Design > D43 - Oligopoly and Other Forms of Market Imperfection; M - Business Administration and Business Economics ; Marketing ; Accounting ; Personnel Economics > M1 - Business Administration > M10 - General; M - Business Administration and Business Economics ; Marketing ; Accounting ; Personnel Economics > M3 - Marketing and Advertising > M31 - Marketing; M - Business Administration and Business Economics ; Marketing ; Accounting ; Personnel Economics > M3 - Marketing and Advertising > M37 - Advertising

References

Adler, Moshe (1985) “Stardom and Talent,” American Economic Review, Vol. 75, pp. 208–212.

Adler, Moshe (2006) “Stardom and Talent,” in Handbook of the Economics of Art and Culture, Vol. 1, Victor A. Ginsburgh and David Throsby (ed.), North Holland, Amsterdam.

Baines, Annette and Kim Langfield-Smith (2003) “Antecedents to Management Accounting Change: A Structural Equation Approach”, Accounting, Organizations and Society, Vol. 28, pp. 675-698.

Bayly, Karen L., Christopher S. Evans and Alan James Taylor (2006) “Measuring Social Structure: a Comparison of Eight Dominance Indices,” Behavioural Processes, Vol. 73, No. 1, pp. 1-12.

Borghans, Lex and Loek Groot (1998) “Superstardom and Monopolistic Power: Why Media Stars Earn More Than Their Marginal Contribution to Welfare,” Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics, Vol. 154, No. 3, pp. 546–571.

Cannon, Walter, B. (1915) Bodily Changes in Pain, Hunger, Fear and Rage, An Account of Recent Researches into the Function of Emotional Excitement, D. Appleton and Co., New York and London.

De Meyer, Arnoud, Jinichiro Nakane, Jeffrey G. Miller, and Kasra Ferdows (1989) “Flexibility: the Next Competitive Battle: The Manufacturing Futures Survey,” Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 10, No. 2, pp. 135-144.

Fischer, Norman (2002) “Competitive Sport's Imitation of War: Imaging the Completeness of Virtue,” Journal of the Philosophy of Sport, Vol. 29, No. 1, pp. 16-37.

Frank, Robert H. (1985) Choosing the Right Pond: Human Behavior and the Quest for Status, Oxford University Press, New York.

Frank, Robert H. (1991) “Positional Externalities,” in Strategy and Choice, Zeckhauser, R.J. (Ed.), MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.

Frank, Robert H. and Philip J. Cook (1995) The Winner-Take-All Society, The Free Press, New York.

Gabszewicz, Jean and Jacques Thisse (1979) “Price Competition, Quality and Income Disparities,” Journal of Economic Theory, Vol. 20, No. 3, pp. 340-359.

Gabszewicz, Jean and Jacques Thisse (1980), “Entry (and Exit) in a Differentiated Industry,” Journal of Economic Theory, Vol. 22, No. 2, pp. 327-338.

Harashima (2016) “Ranking Value and Preference: A Model of Superstardom,” MPRA (The Munich Personal RePEc Archive) Paper, No. 74626.

Hotelling, Harold (1929) “Stability in competition,” Economic Journal, Vol. 39, pp. 41-57.

James, William (1910) “The Moral Equivalent of War,” in Writings: 1902– 1910, Bruce Kuklick (ed.), 1987, Library of America, New York.

Kotha Suresh and Daniel Orne (1989) “Generic Manufacturing Strategies: A Conceptual Synthesis,” Strategic Management Journal, Vo. 10, pp. 211-231.

Kotha Suresh and Bhatt L. Vadlamani (1995) “Assessing Generic Strategies: An Empirical Investigation of Two Competing Typologies in Discrete Manufacturing Industries,” Strategic Management Journal, Vo. 16, pp. 75-83.

Landau, H. G. (1951) “On Dominance Relations and the Structure of Animal Societies: I. Effect of Inherent Characteristics,” The Bulletin of Mathematical Biophysics, Vol. 13, No. 1, pp 1-19.

Lillis, Anne M. (2002) “Managing Multiple Dimensions of Manufacturing Performance - An Exploratory Study,” Accounting, Organizations and Society, Vol. 27, pp. 497-529.

Miller, Danny (1988) “Relating Porter’s Business Strategies to Environment and Structure: Analysis and Performance Implications,” Academy of Management Review, Vol. 31, No. 2, pp. 280-308.

Porter, Michael E. (1980) Competitive Strategy, Free Press, New York.

Porter, Michael E. (1985) Competitive Advantage, Free Press, New York.

Rosen, S. (1981) “The Economics of Superstars,” American Economic Review, Vol. 71, pp.845–858.

Salop, Steven C. (1979) “Monopolistic Competition with Outside Goods,” Bell Journal of Economics, Vol. 10, No. 1, pp. 141-156.

Santayana, George (1972) “Philosophy on the Bleachers,” in Sport and the Body, Ellen Gerber (ed.), Lea and Febiger, Philadelphia.

Shaked, Avner and John Sutton (1982) “'Relaxing Price Competition through Product Differentiation,” Review of Economic Studies, Vol. 49, pp. 3-14.

Shaked, Avner and John Sutton (1983) “'Natural Oligopolies,” Econometrica, Vol. 51, pp. 1469-1483.

Solnick, Sara J. and David Hemenway (1998) Is More Always Better?: A Survey on Positional Concerns,” Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Vol. 37, pp. 373 – 383.