Tsoulfidis, Lefteris (2018): Ricardo’s Theory of Value is Still Alive and Well in Contemporary Capitalism.

PDF
MPRA_paper_85822.pdf Download (976kB)  Preview 
Abstract
The purpose of this article is, on the one hand, to shed light on some significant aspects of Ricardo's theory of value and on the other hand to show that Ricardo's insights about the explanatory power of the relative labour times on the movement of relative prices were in the right direction. For this purpose, Ricardo's theory of value is cast rigorously and in modern terms such that by using detailed intertemporal data from inputoutput tables of two major economies to show that Ricardo's insights are absolutely consistent with the facts.
Item Type:  MPRA Paper 

Original Title:  Ricardo’s Theory of Value is Still Alive and Well in Contemporary Capitalism 
Language:  English 
Keywords:  David Ricardo; Value and distribution, Pricevalue deviations 
Subjects:  B  History of Economic Thought, Methodology, and Heterodox Approaches > B1  History of Economic Thought through 1925 > B12  Classical (includes Adam Smith) B  History of Economic Thought, Methodology, and Heterodox Approaches > B1  History of Economic Thought through 1925 > B14  Socialist ; Marxist B  History of Economic Thought, Methodology, and Heterodox Approaches > B1  History of Economic Thought through 1925 > B16  Quantitative and Mathematical B  History of Economic Thought, Methodology, and Heterodox Approaches > B3  History of Economic Thought: Individuals B  History of Economic Thought, Methodology, and Heterodox Approaches > B4  Economic Methodology B  History of Economic Thought, Methodology, and Heterodox Approaches > B5  Current Heterodox Approaches > B51  Socialist ; Marxian ; Sraffian B  History of Economic Thought, Methodology, and Heterodox Approaches > B5  Current Heterodox Approaches > B52  Institutional ; Evolutionary C  Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C0  General C  Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C1  Econometric and Statistical Methods and Methodology: General C  Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C2  Single Equation Models ; Single Variables C  Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C3  Multiple or Simultaneous Equation Models ; Multiple Variables C  Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C4  Econometric and Statistical Methods: Special Topics C  Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C5  Econometric Modeling C  Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C6  Mathematical Methods ; Programming Models ; Mathematical and Simulation Modeling C  Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C6  Mathematical Methods ; Programming Models ; Mathematical and Simulation Modeling > C67  InputOutput Models D  Microeconomics > D3  Distribution D  Microeconomics > D4  Market Structure, Pricing, and Design D  Microeconomics > D4  Market Structure, Pricing, and Design > D46  Value Theory D  Microeconomics > D5  General Equilibrium and Disequilibrium > D57  InputOutput Tables and Analysis 
Item ID:  85822 
Depositing User:  Lefteris Tsoulfidis 
Date Deposited:  11 Apr 2018 07:15 
Last Modified:  26 Sep 2019 10:01 
References:  Garegnani, P. (1983). "The Classical Theory of Wages and the Role of Demand Schedules in the Determination of Relative Prices", American Economic Review, 73: 30913. Hollander, S. (1985). "On the Substantive Identity of the Ricardian and Neoclassical Conceptions of Economic Organization: the French Connection in British Classicism". In Caravale, G. (ed.) The Legacy of Ricardo. New York: Basil Blackwell. Kurz, H. (2018). "Stigler on Ricardo". Centro Sraffa Working Papers CSWP27, Centro di Ricerche e Documentazione "Piero Sraffa". Mariolis, T. and Tsoulfidis, L. (2016). Modern Classical Economics and Reality: Spectral Analysis of the Theory of Value and Distribution, Tokyo, Springer Verlag. Marshall, A. (1920). Principles of Economics. London: Macmillan. Ricardo, D. (1951a). On the Principles of Political Economy and Taxation, ed. by Sraffa, P. with the collaboration of M. Dobb, The Works and Correspondence of David Ricardo, vol. I, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Ricardo, D. (1951b). The Works and Correspondence of David Ricardo, vol. VIII, ed. by Sraffa, P. with the collaboration of M. Dobb, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Semmler, W. (1984). Competition, Monopoly, and Differential Profit Rates. New York: Columbia University Press. Shaikh, A. (1984). "The Transformation from Marx to Sraffa." In Freeman, A. and Mandel E. (eds.), Ricardo, Marx, and Sraffa. London: Verso. Shaikh A. (2016). Capitalism: Competition, Conflict, Crises. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Smith, A. (1776). The Wealth of Nations, edited by E. Cannan. New York: Random. House 1937. Steedman, I. (1982). "Marx on Ricardo". In Bradley, I. and Howard, M. (eds.) Classical and Marxian Political Economy. London: Macmillan. Steedman, I. and Tomkins, J. (1998). "On Measuring the Deviation of Prices from Values." Cambridge Journal of Economics, 22(3): 37985. Stigler, G. (1958). "Ricardo and the 93 per cent Labor Theory of Value". American Economic Review, 48(3): 35767. Tsaliki, P., Paraskevopoulou, C. and Tsoulfidis, L. (2018). "Unequal Exchange and Absolute Cost Advantage: Evidence from the Trade between Greece and Germany", Cambridge Journal of Economics, https://doi.org/10.1093/cje/bex060. Tsoulfidis, L. (2008). PriceValue Deviations: Further Evidence from InputOutput Data of Japan. International Review of Applied Economics, 22(6): 707–24. Tsoulfidis, L. (2010). Competing Schools of Economic Thought. Heidelberg: Springer Verlag. Tsoulfidis, L. (2013). "Public Debt and J.S. Mill’s Conjecture: A Note". History of Economic Thought and Policy, No 2: 93102. Tsoulfidis, L. (2015) Bullion's Controversies. In Rochon, L.P. and Ross, S. (eds.) Encyclopedia of Central Banking. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar 2015. Tsoulfidis, L. and Maniatis, T. (2002). "Values, Prices of Production, and Market Prices: Some More Evidence from the Greek Economy." Cambridge Journal of Economics 26 (3): 35969. Tsoulfidis, L. and Paitaridis, D. (2016) "Monetary Expressions of Labor Time and Market Prices: Theory and Evidence from China, Japan and Korea," Review of Political Economy, 29(1): 111132. 
URI:  https://mpra.ub.unimuenchen.de/id/eprint/85822 