Jurdziak, Leszek (2006): Lignite price negotiation between opencast mine and power plant as a two-stage, two-person, cooperative, non-zero sum game. Published in: Proceedings of the 8th International Symposium Continuous Surface Mining , Vol. ISBN 3, No. Department of Mining Engineering III, RWTH Aachen University (24 September 2006): pp. 469-476.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_1600.pdf Download (350kB) | Preview |
Abstract
Based on the simple model of the deposit the methodology of finding the optimal solution for bilateral monopoly (BM) of lignite mine and power plant is shown taking into account pit optimisation. It is proposed to treat lignite price negotiation as a kind of game. In the first stage (cooperative) both sides should select the ultimate pit maximising joint profits of BM and in the second one (competitive) the agreement should be achieved regarding profit division. This can be realised through side payments or by establishing the lignite transfer price. Lack of cooperation and opportunism can lead to the suboptimal solution – excavation of the smaller pit. Due to information asymmetry realisation of the optimal solution is more probably in vertically integrated firms. Dynamic adjustments of LOM BM plan to short-term changes of energy market using optimisation, BM model, game theory and their valuation as real options is the new direction of further re-search.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Institution: | Institute of Mining Engineering at Wroclaw University of Technology |
Original Title: | Lignite price negotiation between opencast mine and power plant as a two-stage, two-person, cooperative, non-zero sum game |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | bilateral monopoly; co-operative game; price negotiation; non-zero sum game; Pareto optimal solution; lignite price; power plant; lignite mine; pit optimisation; optimal ultimate pit; pit phases; |
Subjects: | L - Industrial Organization > L2 - Firm Objectives, Organization, and Behavior > L22 - Firm Organization and Market Structure D - Microeconomics > D8 - Information, Knowledge, and Uncertainty > D82 - Asymmetric and Private Information ; Mechanism Design D - Microeconomics > D4 - Market Structure, Pricing, and Design > D43 - Oligopoly and Other Forms of Market Imperfection D - Microeconomics > D8 - Information, Knowledge, and Uncertainty > D86 - Economics of Contract: Theory C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C7 - Game Theory and Bargaining Theory > C78 - Bargaining Theory ; Matching Theory D - Microeconomics > D2 - Production and Organizations > D24 - Production ; Cost ; Capital ; Capital, Total Factor, and Multifactor Productivity ; Capacity L - Industrial Organization > L1 - Market Structure, Firm Strategy, and Market Performance > L13 - Oligopoly and Other Imperfect Markets D - Microeconomics > D7 - Analysis of Collective Decision-Making > D74 - Conflict ; Conflict Resolution ; Alliances ; Revolutions L - Industrial Organization > L1 - Market Structure, Firm Strategy, and Market Performance > L11 - Production, Pricing, and Market Structure ; Size Distribution of Firms L - Industrial Organization > L1 - Market Structure, Firm Strategy, and Market Performance > L14 - Transactional Relationships ; Contracts and Reputation ; Networks Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q3 - Nonrenewable Resources and Conservation > Q31 - Demand and Supply ; Prices L - Industrial Organization > L7 - Industry Studies: Primary Products and Construction > L72 - Mining, Extraction, and Refining: Other Nonrenewable Resources C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C7 - Game Theory and Bargaining Theory > C71 - Cooperative Games L - Industrial Organization > L9 - Industry Studies: Transportation and Utilities > L94 - Electric Utilities |
Item ID: | 1600 |
Depositing User: | Leszek JURDZIAK |
Date Deposited: | 30 Jan 2007 |
Last Modified: | 26 Sep 2019 11:19 |
References: | Blair, R.D. & Kaserman, D.L. (1987). A Note on Bilateral Monopoly and Formula Price Contracts. The American Economic Review; June 77; 3. Jurdziak, L. (2004a). Tandem: lignite opencast mine & power plant as a bilateral monopoly. Mine Planning and Equip-ment Selection, A.A Balkema Publishers. Jurdziak, L. (2004b). The influence of lignite opencast mine optimisation on solution of bilateral monopoly model of lignite mine & power plant in long run (in Polish). Gor-nictwo Odkrywkowe (Opencast Mining) No 7-8. Jurdziak, L. (2005a). Is vertical integration of mines and power plants profitable and for whom? (in Polish). Bulle-tin of Energy Market Regulation Authority No 2(40). Jurdziak, L. (2005b). The influence of ownership and organ-izational structure on operation of bilateral monopoly of lignite mine and power plant (in Polish). The Fourth Lig-nite Mining Congress. Scientific Papers of the Institute of Mining Engineering of the Wroclaw University of Tech-nology No 112, Conferences No 44, Wroclaw. Jurdziak, L. (2006a). Negotiation between lignite mine and power plant as co-operational, two-stage, two-person game with non-zero sum (in Polish). Energetyka (Electric Energy Industry), No 2. Jurdziak, L. (2006b in press). Nash bargaining solution and the split of profit in bilateral monopoly of lignite opencast mine and power plant. Part one: theoretical foundations and Part two: applications in strategic and tactical nego-tiations (in Polish). Gornictwo Odkrywkowe (Opencast Mining). Jurdziak, L. & Kawalec, W. (2004). Sensitivity analysis of lignite ultimate pit size and its parameters on change of lignite base price (in Polish). Mining and geology VII. Scientific Papers of the Institute of Mining Engineering of the Wroclaw University of Technology No 106, Studies and Research No 30, Wroclaw. Kawalec, W. (2004). Short-term scheduling and blending in lignite open-pit mine with BWEs. Mine Planning and Equipment Selection, A.A Balkema Publishers. Straffin, P.D. (2004). Game theory (in Polish), Scientific Publisher Scholar. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/1600 |