Dietrich, Franz and List, Christian (2012): Mentalism versus behaviourism in economics: a philosophy-of-science perspective.
This is the latest version of this item.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_43231.pdf Download (788kB) | Preview |
Abstract
Behaviourism is the view that preferences, beliefs, and other mental states in socialscientific theories are nothing but constructs re-describing people’s behavioural dispositions. Mentalism is the view that they capture real phenomena, no less existent than the unobservable entities and properties in the natural sciences, such as electrons and electromagnetic fields. While behaviourism has long gone out of fashion in psychology and linguistics, it remains influential in economics, especially in ‘revealed preference’ theory. We aim to (i) clear up some common confusions about the two views, (ii) situate the debate in a historical context, and (iii) defend a mentalist approach to economics. Setting aside normative concerns about behaviourism, we show that mentalism is in line with best scientific practice even if economics is treated as a purely positive science of economic behaviour. We distinguish mentalism from, and reject, the radical neuroeconomic view that behaviour should be explained in terms of people’s brain processes, as distinct from their mental states.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Mentalism versus behaviourism in economics: a philosophy-of-science perspective |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | behaviourism, mentalism, realism, economic models, preferences, beliefs, rationalization, philosophy of science, neuroeconomics |
Subjects: | B - History of Economic Thought, Methodology, and Heterodox Approaches > B0 - General C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C0 - General A - General Economics and Teaching > A1 - General Economics > A11 - Role of Economics ; Role of Economists ; Market for Economists D - Microeconomics > D0 - General > D03 - Behavioral Microeconomics: Underlying Principles D - Microeconomics > D0 - General N - Economic History > N0 - General A - General Economics and Teaching > A1 - General Economics > A12 - Relation of Economics to Other Disciplines D - Microeconomics > D0 - General > D01 - Microeconomic Behavior: Underlying Principles A - General Economics and Teaching > A1 - General Economics > A14 - Sociology of Economics B - History of Economic Thought, Methodology, and Heterodox Approaches > B4 - Economic Methodology > B41 - Economic Methodology |
Item ID: | 43231 |
Depositing User: | Franz Dietrich |
Date Deposited: | 12 Dec 2012 16:47 |
Last Modified: | 11 Oct 2019 07:48 |
References: | Aumann, R., and Brandenburger, A. (1995) `Epistemic Conditions for Nash Equilibrium', Econometrica 63(5): 1161-1180. Benabou, R., and J. Tirole (2003) `Intrinsic and Extrinsic Motivation', Review of Economic Studies 70, 489-520. Bennett, M., D. Dennett, P. Hacker, and J. Searle (2007) Neuroscience and Philosophy, New York (Columbia University Press). Bhattacharyya, A., P. K. Pattanaik, and Y. Xu (2011) `Choice, Internal Consistency and Rationality', Economics and Philosophy 27(2): 123-149. Block, N. (1980) `What is Functionalism?' in Readings in Philosophy of Psychology, vol. 1, Cambridge/MA (Harvard University Press), pp. 171-184. Bossert, W., and K. Suzumura (2009) `External Norms and Rationality of Choice', Economics and Philosophy 25: 139-152. Bossert, W., and K. Suzumura (2010) Consistency, Choice, and Rationality, Cambridge/MA (Harvard University Press). Brennan, G., and P. Pettit (2005) The Economy of Esteem, Oxford (Oxford University Press). Camerer, C. F., G. Loewenstein, and D. Prelec (2005) `Neuroeconomics: How Neuroscience Can Inform Economics', Journal of Economic Literature 43(1): 9-64. Camerer, C. F., G. Loewenstein, and M. Rabin (2004) Advances in Behavioral Economics, Princeton (Princeton University Press). Caplin, A., and A. Schotter (eds.) (2008), The Foundations of Positive and Normative Economics, Oxford/New York (Oxford University Press). Chalmers, D. (2010), The Character of Consciousness, Oxford (Oxford University Press). Cherepanov, V., T. Feddersen, and A. Sandroni (2008) `Rationalization', working paper, University of Pennsylvania. Chomsky, N. (1959) `A Review of B. F. Skinner's Verbal Behavior ', Language 35(1): 26-58. Conradt, L., and C. List (eds.) (2009) `Group decision making in humans and animals', theme issue of Philosophical Tansactions of the Royal Society B 364: 717-852. Cozic, M. (2012) `Economie "sans esprit" et donn´ees cognitives', working paper, Institut d'Histoire et de Philosophie des Sciences et des Techniques, Paris. Davidson, D. (1973) `Radical Interpretation', Dialectica 27(3-4): 313-328. Dennett, D. (1987) The Intentional Stance, Cambridge/MA (MIT Press). Dietrich, F. (2012) `Modelling change in individual characteristics: an axiomatic framework', Games and Economic Behavior (in press) Dietrich, F., and C. List (2012a) `A reason-based theory of rational choice', Nous (in press). Dietrich, F., and C. List (2012b) `Where do preferences come from?', International Journal of Game Theory (in press). Edwards, J. M. (2008) `On Behaviorism, Introspection, Psychology and Economics', working paper, University of Paris 1, Panth´eon-Sorbonne. Elster, J. (1998) `Emotions and Economic Theory', Journal of Economic Literature 36(1): 47-74. Fine, A. (1984) `The Natural Ontological Attitude', in J. Leplin (ed.), Philosophy of Science, Berkeley (University of California Press). Fodor, J. A. (1974) `Special sciences (or: The disunity of science as a working hypothesis)', Synthese 28(2): 97-115. Fodor, J. A. (1975) The Language of Thought, Cambridge/MA (Harvard University Press). Geanakoplos, J., and D. Pearce (1989) `Psychological games and sequential rationality', Games and Economic Behavior 1(1): 60-79. Gigerenzer, G., P. M. Todd, and the ABC Research Group (2000) Simple Heuristics That Make Us Smart, New York (Oxford University Press). Graham, G. (2010) `Behaviorism', in E. N. Zalta (ed.), Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2010 Edition), available at: http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2010/entries/behaviorism/ Gul, F., and W. Pesendorfer (2008) `The Case for Mindless Economics', in A. Caplin and A. Schotter (eds.), The Foundations of Positive and Normative Economics, Oxford/New York (Oxford University Press), pp. 3-39. Harre, R. (1970) The principles of scientific thinking, London (Macmillan). Harrison, G. W. (2008) Neuroeconomics: A Critical Reconsideration, Economics and Philosophy 24(3): 303-344. Hausman, D. (1998) `Problems with Realism in Economics', Economics and Philosophy 14: 185-213. Hausman, D. (2000) `Revealed Preference, Belief, and Game Theory', Economics and Philosophy 16: 99-115. Hausman, D. (2008) `Mindless or Mindful Economics: A Methodological Evaluation', in A. Caplin and A. Schotter (eds.), The Foundations of Positive and Normative Economics, Oxford/New York (Oxford University Press), pp. 125-151. Katz, J. J. (1964) `Mentalism in Linguistics', Language 40(2): 124-137. Koszegi, B., and M. Rabin (2007) `Mistakes in Choice-Based Welfare Analysis', American Economic Review 97(2): 477-481. Langendoen, D. T. (1998) `Bloomfield', in R. A. Wilson and F. C. Keil (eds.), The MIT Encyclopedia of Cognitive Science, Cambridge/MA (MIT Press), pp. 90-91. List, C. (1999) `Craig's Theorem and the Empirical Underdetermination Thesis Reassessed', Disputatio 7: 28-39. List, C. (2003) `Are Interpersonal Comparisons of Utility Indeterminate', Erkenntnis 58: 229-260. List, C., and P. Menzies (2009) `Non-reductive physicalism and the limits of the exclusion principle', Journal of Philosophy CVI (9): 475-502. List, C. (2011) `Free will, determinism, and the possibility of doing otherwise', Nous (forthcoming). List, C., and P. Pettit (2011) Group Agency: The Possibility, Design, and Status of Corporate Agents, Oxford (Oxford University Press). List, C., and K. Spiekermann (2012) `Methodological Individualism and Holism in Political Science: A Reconciliation', working paper, London School of Economics, available at: http://personal.lse.ac.uk/list/PDF-files/IndividualismHolism.pdf Loewenstein, G. (2000) `Emotions in Economic Theory and Economic Behavior', American Economic Review 90(2): 426-432. Mandler, M., P. Manzini, and M. Mariotti (2012) `A million answers to twenty questions: Choosing by checklist', Journal of Economic Theory 147: 71-92. Manzini, P., and M. Mariotti (2007) `Sequentially Rationalizable Choice', American Economic Review 97(5): 1824-1839. Manzini, P., and M. Mariotti (2012) `Moody choice', working paper, University of St Andrews. Maxwell, G. (1962) `On the Ontological Status of Theoretical Entities', in H. Feigl and G. Maxwell (eds.), Scientific Explanation, Space, and Time; Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science, Volume III, Minneapolis (University of Minnesota Press). Mongin, P. (2011) `La théorie de la décision et la psychologie du sens commun', Social Science Information 50(3-4): 351-374. Moore, J. (2001) `On Distinguishing Methodological from Radical Behaviorism', European Journal of Behavior Analysis 2: 221-244. Musgrave, A. (1989) `Noa's Ark -- Fine for Realism', The Philosophical Quarterly 39(157): 383-398. Pettit, P. (1991) `Decision Theory and Folk Psychology', in M. Bacharach and S. Hurley (eds.), Foundations of Decision Theory: Issues and Advances, Oxford (Blackwell), pp. 147-175. Pinker, S. (1994). The Language Instinct: How the Mind Creates Language, New York (William Morrow). Putnam, H. (1975) `Philosophy and our mental life', in Mind, Language and Reality, Cambridge (Cambridge University Press). Quine, W. V. (1948) `On What There Is', Review of Metaphysics 2: 21-38. Quine, W. V. (1960) Word and Object, Cambridge/MA (MIT Press). Quine, W. V. (1975) `Empirically Equivalent Systems of the World', Erkenntnis 9: 313-328. Richter, M. K. (1966) `Revealed Preference Theory', Econometrica 34(3): 635-645. Romer, P. M. (2000) `Thinking and Feeling', American Economic Review 90(2): 439-443. Samuelson, P. (1938) `A Note on the Pure Theory of Consumer's Behaviour', Economica (New Series) 5(17): 61-71. Sen, A. K. (1971) `Choice Functions and Revealed Preference', Review of Economic Studies 38(3): 307-317. Sen, A. K. (1993) `Internal Consistency of Choice', Econometrica 61(3): 495-521. Shapere, D. (1982) `The Concept of Observation in Science and Philosophy', Philosophy of Science 49(4): 485-525. Simon, H. A. (1956) `Rational choice and the structure of the environment', Psychological Review 63(2): 129-138. Suzumura, K., and Y. Xu (2001) `Characterizations of Consequentialism and Nonconsequentialism', Journal of Economic Theory 101(2): 423-436. Tomasello, M. (1995) `Language is Not an Instinct', Cognitive Development 10: 131-156. van Fraassen, B. C. (1980) The Scientific Image, Oxford (Oxford University Press). Wakker, P. (2010) Prospect Theory: For Risk and Ambiguity, Cambridge (Cambridge University Press). Woodward, J. (2011) `Scientific Explanation', in E. N. Zalta (ed.), Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Winter 2011 Edition), available at: http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2011/entries/scientific-explanation/ |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/43231 |
Available Versions of this Item
-
Mentalism versus behaviourism in economics: a philosophy-of-science perspective. (deposited 16 Apr 2012 12:50)
- Mentalism versus behaviourism in economics: a philosophy-of-science perspective. (deposited 12 Dec 2012 16:47) [Currently Displayed]