Pragmatic identity and alterity in political discourse

Boicu, Ruxandra (2007): Pragmatic identity and alterity in political discourse. Published in: University of Bucharest Review, A Journal of Literary and Cultural Studies , Vol. Vol IX, No. no. 4/2007 : pp. 76-83.

Abstract

The article analyzes a sample of political discourse, namely the speech entitled “We Want Our Country Back”, delivered by the British nationalist, MEP, Ashley Mote. In the communication situation, the audience is made up of conservative, right-wing politicians or supporters, mainly readers of the nationalist “Right Now” magazine. The politician utterer interacts both with the interlocutors present, considered to share the speaker’s national and religious identity and with potential interlocutors that may embody a rejected alterity. The article quotes Mote’s words in order to demonstrate how the politician’s identity is negotiated in discourse through the interplay of hypostases of identity and alterity. Their linguistic manifestations are occurrences of personal deixis and the pragmatic roles that the utterer attributes to himself and to his interlocutors. In political discourse, there is a deep-going opposition between “I”/”We” and “They”. In fact, the relationship is more complex, but it can be reduced to the politician’s acceptance of his allies’ alterity and rejection of his opponents’ alterity. As to the pragmatic roles assigned by the utterer, they make up a ‘drama’ in discourse and the latter becomes the battlefield for power: the persuasive power that relies on the illocutionary forces released by the macro-speech act which a political speech stands for.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: identity, alterity, pragmatic roles, nationalism, speech acts
• Subjects: J - Labor and Demographic Economics > J0 - General > J00 - General; J - Labor and Demographic Economics > J2 - Demand and Supply of Labor; J - Labor and Demographic Economics > J2 - Demand and Supply of Labor > J20 - General; J - Labor and Demographic Economics > J2 - Demand and Supply of Labor > J23 - Labor Demand; J - Labor and Demographic Economics > J6 - Mobility, Unemployment, Vacancies, and Immigrant Workers; J - Labor and Demographic Economics > J7 - Labor Discrimination; J - Labor and Demographic Economics > J7 - Labor Discrimination > J71 - Discrimination; J - Labor and Demographic Economics > J8 - Labor Standards: National and International; J - Labor and Demographic Economics > J8 - Labor Standards: National and International > J82 - Labor Force Composition; J - Labor and Demographic Economics > J8 - Labor Standards: National and International > J83 - Workers' Rights; Z - Other Special Topics > Z1 - Cultural Economics ; Economic Sociology ; Economic Anthropology

References

WORKS CITED

Charaudeau, Patrick. Le discours politique: les masques du pouvoir. Paris : Vuibert,2005.

Hofstede, Geert. Managementul structurilor multiculturale. Bucureşti : Ed. Economică,1996.

Van Dijk, Teun A.. Ideology: A Multidisciplinary Approach. London: Sage, 2000.

Van Dijk, Teun A..”El discurso y el racismo”. El discurso como interacción social. Estudios sobre el discurso. Ed. Teun A. van Dijk . Barcelona: Gedisa, 2005. 101-130.

BIBLIOGRAPHY

Bar-Hillel, Jehoshua. “Indexical Expressions”. Pragmatique et théorie de l’énonciation: choix de textes. Ed. Vlad Alexandrescu. Bucureşti: Editura Universităţii din Bucureşti, 2001.

Benveniste, Emile. Problèmes de linguistique générale. Paris : Gallimard, 1969.

Benveniste, Emile. “L’appareil formel de l’énonciation”. Pragmatique et théorie de l’énonciation : choix de textes. Ed. Vlad Alexandrescu. Bucureşti: Editura Universităţii din Bucureşti, 2001.

Charaudeau, Patrick. Le discours politique: les masques du pouvoir. Paris: Vuibert,2005.

Chilton, Paul, Christina Schaffner. “Discurso y politica”. El discurso como interacción social. Estudios sobre el discurso. Ed.Teun A. van Dijk. Barcelona : Gedisa,2005. 32-76.

De Mulder, Walter, Liliana Tasmowsky. Coherence and Anaphora. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 1996.

Garcia Pastor, Maria D. Pragmatics and the 2000 US Elections : Issues of Politeness and Power in Political Campaign Debates. Valencia: Universidad de Valencia, 2001.

Goffman, Erving. Les rites d’interaction. Paris : Minuit, 1974.

Ghiglione, Rodolphe. “Paroles de meetings”. Pragmatique du discours politique. Ed.Alain Trognon, J. Larrue. Paris: Armand Colin, 1994.

Hofstede, Geert. Managementul structurilor multiculturale. Bucureşti : Ed. Economică,1996.

Ionescu-Ruxăndoiu, Liliana. Limbaj şi comunicare. Bucureşti : Ed. All, 2003.

Kerbrat-Orecchioni, Catherine. Echanges sur la conversation. Editions du CNRS, 1988.

Kerbrat-Orecchioni, Catherine. Les interactions verbales. Paris : Armand Colin, 1992.

Măgureanu, Anca. “Le sujet en pragmatique”. Pragmatique et théorie de l’énonciation: choix de textes. Ed. Vlad Alexandrescu. Bucureşti: Editura Universităţii din Bucureşti, 2001.

Moeschler, Jacques, Anne Reboul. Dicţionar enciclopedic de pragmatică. Cluj-Napoca: Echinox, 1999.

Otaola Olano, Concepción. Análisis lingíiístico del discurso. Madrid: Ediciones Académicos, 2006.

Perkins, Redere Dale. Deixis, Grammar and Culture. Ámsterdam: John Benjamins, 1992.

Reboul, Anne, Jacques Moeschler. Pragmatica, azi. Cluj: Echinox, 2001.

Van Dijk, Teun A.. Ideology: A Multidisciplinary Approach. London: Sage, 2000.

Van Dijk, Teun A.”El discurso y el racismo”. El discurso como interacción social. Estudios sobre el discurso. Ed. Teun A. van Dijk . Barcelona: Gedisa, 2005. 101-130.