Pegnalver, Domingo (2013): Análisis del impacto social de las inversiones públicas en infraestructuras. La huella social.
This is the latest version of this item.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_47647.pdf Download (151kB) | Preview |
Abstract
The welfare and social peace are the most important concepts when making policy decisions and investment spending of public resources. Currently both welfare and social peace are compromised by the lack of productive capital and excess of speculative capital, the imbalance between suffering cutbacks labor incomes and speculative capital gains. This autor paper proposes and develops a new way for social impact assessment of public investment in infrastructures, the Social Trace, related to the concept of sustainable development as it was defined by Brundtland report. The creation and operation of public infrastructure and its relation to the right to decent work, GDP, inflation and the unemployment rate is the pillar on which this theory rests.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Análisis del impacto social de las inversiones públicas en infraestructuras. La huella social |
English Title: | Social impact assessment of public investments in infrastructures. The social trace |
Language: | Spanish |
Keywords: | public investment, infrastructure, social cost benefit analysis, social CBA, social NPV, inflation, NAIRU, unemployment, social trace. |
Subjects: | E - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics > E2 - Consumption, Saving, Production, Investment, Labor Markets, and Informal Economy > E24 - Employment ; Unemployment ; Wages ; Intergenerational Income Distribution ; Aggregate Human Capital ; Aggregate Labor Productivity E - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics > E2 - Consumption, Saving, Production, Investment, Labor Markets, and Informal Economy > E27 - Forecasting and Simulation: Models and Applications R - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics > R1 - General Regional Economics > R11 - Regional Economic Activity: Growth, Development, Environmental Issues, and Changes R - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics > R1 - General Regional Economics > R13 - General Equilibrium and Welfare Economic Analysis of Regional Economies R - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics > R4 - Transportation Economics > R42 - Government and Private Investment Analysis ; Road Maintenance ; Transportation Planning R - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics > R5 - Regional Government Analysis > R50 - General R - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics > R5 - Regional Government Analysis > R58 - Regional Development Planning and Policy |
Item ID: | 47647 |
Depositing User: | X D P |
Date Deposited: | 18 Jun 2013 15:42 |
Last Modified: | 21 Oct 2019 01:22 |
References: | ASCHAUER D.A. (1989). “Is Public Expenditure Productive?”. Journal of Monetary Economics, 23, 177-200. North-Holland. BICKEL P. et al (2006). Proposal for harmonized guidelines, EU-project developing harmonized approaches for transport costing and project assessment (HEATCO). IER, Stuttgart. BRUISINA F.R., RIENSTRA S.A. and RIETVELD P. (1996). “Economic Impacts of the Construction of a Transport Corridor: A Multi-level and Multi-Approach Case Study for the Construction of the A1 Highway in the Netherlands”. CARIDE M.J. Y GONZÁLEZ X.M. (2003). “Análisis coste-beneficio de la conexión Galicia-Madrid con un servicio ferroviario de alta velocidad”. Universidad de Vigo. CRIHFIELD J. AND PANGGABEAN M. (1995). “Is public infrastructure productive? A metropolitan perspective using new capital stock estimates”, Regional Science and Urban Economics, 25, 607-630. GARCÍA-MILÁ T., Mc GUIRE T. AND Porter R.H. (1996) "The effect of public capital in state-level production functions reconsidered", The Review of Economic and Statistics, LXXVIII, 177-180. HOLTZ-EAKIN, D. (1994) "Public-sector capital and the productivity puzzle", The Review of Economics and Statistics, 76, 12-21. COMPTE. A, RUS G., BETANCOR O., CAMPOS J., EUGENIO J.L., SOCORRO P., MATAS A., RAYMOND J.L., GONZÁLEZ-SAVIGNAT M., BREY R., NOMBELA G. Y BENAVIDES J. (2011). “Evaluación Socioeconómica y Financiera de Proyectos de Transporte (PT2007-001-IAPP). HERNÁNDEZ DE COS P., IZQUIERDO M. Y URTASUN A. (2011). “Una estimación del crecimiento potencial de la economía española”. Documentos Ocasionales nº 1.104. Banco de España. MORENO R. AND LÓPEZ-BAZO E. (2003). “The Impact of Infrastructure on Regional Economic Growth: Some Results on its Spillover Effect”. Universitat de Barcelona. RUS, G. Y V. INGLADA (1993). "Análisis coste-beneficio del tren de alta velocidad". Revista de Economía Aplicada. Vol 1, nº3, pp. 27-48. TURRÓ M. (2011). “La evaluación de proyectos de inversión en transporte por parte de las instituciones financieras internacionales: la experiencia del Banco Europeo de Inversiones”. Cuadernos Económicos de ICE, n. 80. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/47647 |
Available Versions of this Item
-
Análisis del impacto social de las inversiones públicas en infraestructuras. La huella social. (deposited 23 May 2013 00:05)
- Análisis del impacto social de las inversiones públicas en infraestructuras. La huella social. (deposited 18 Jun 2013 15:42) [Currently Displayed]