KOUADIO, Hugues and DESDOIGTS, Alain (2012): Déforestation, migrations, saturation et réformes foncières: La Côte d’Ivoire entre résilience rurale et litiges fonciers.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_49938.pdf Download (355kB) | Preview |
Abstract
In the tropics, land transactions remain today carried out within the framework of custom and therefore constitute uncompleted sales, which it is often argued hinders investment and rural economic resilience. The Ivory Coast is no exception to the rule. Nevertheless, the absence of proper land titles has not prevented the Ivory Coast from becoming the first world producer of cocoa. This paper shows how the process of colonization of the land by internal and foreign migrants, encouraged and supported by the Ivorian State since independence, has led to the persual of an agrarian transition where small-holding migrants with the most fragile land tenure status take seriously the influence of the life cycle of tree crops when planning various types of investments for their land. Moreover, they tend, ceteris paribus, to invest more resources into their fields and to set up good agronomic practices. If this settlement dynamic enabled rural communities to steer towards a resilient agriculture, the absence of clearly defined property rights along with demographic pressure and land saturation has however led to a Malthusian crisis, curbing the green revolution.
En dépit des nombreuses lois promulguées, depuis l'État colonial en 1935 jusqu'à l'État indépendant en 1998, le droit coutumier qui ne bénéficie plus d'aucune protection juridique, et sa gestion collective et informelle du foncier rural fait de la résistance. En 2009, 98% des transactions foncières s'effectuent toujours dans le cadre de la coutume et constituent pour beaucoup d'entre elles des "ventes inachevées." L'absence de titres de propriété n'a pourtant pas empêché la Côte d'Ivoire de devenir le premier producteur mondial de cacao. Cette étude montre comment le processus de déforestation et de colonisation de la terre par des migrants allochtones et allogènes encouragés et soutenus par l'État ivoirien depuis son indépendance, a engagé le pays dans une transition agraire en incitant les paysans au statut foncier le plus fragile, à investir et à mettre en oeuvre les bonnes pratiques agronomiques. L'absence de droits de propriété clairement définis associée à la pression démographique et à la saturation foncière ont cependant favorisé l'émergence de conflits fonciers. Les litiges fonciers sont-ils la seule réponse à la pression démographique ou, au contraire, la saturation foncière que cette dynamique de peuplement engendre, permet-elle aux sociétés rurales de s'orienter vers une résilience agricole synonyme d'intensification et d'accroissement de la production agricole?
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Déforestation, migrations, saturation et réformes foncières: La Côte d’Ivoire entre résilience rurale et litiges fonciers |
English Title: | Deforestation, migration, saturation and land reforms: Côte d'Ivoire between resilience and rural land disputes |
Language: | French |
Keywords: | Droits et litiges fonciers, stratégie politique et réformes, transition Droits et litiges fonciers, stratégie politique et réformes, transition agraire, cycle de vie des cultures pérennes, rituel et espace sacré. |
Subjects: | C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C3 - Multiple or Simultaneous Equation Models ; Multiple Variables > C35 - Discrete Regression and Qualitative Choice Models ; Discrete Regressors ; Proportions C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C3 - Multiple or Simultaneous Equation Models ; Multiple Variables > C36 - Instrumental Variables (IV) Estimation O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O1 - Economic Development O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O1 - Economic Development > O13 - Agriculture ; Natural Resources ; Energy ; Environment ; Other Primary Products O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O1 - Economic Development > O15 - Human Resources ; Human Development ; Income Distribution ; Migration O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O1 - Economic Development > O17 - Formal and Informal Sectors ; Shadow Economy ; Institutional Arrangements Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q1 - Agriculture > Q15 - Land Ownership and Tenure ; Land Reform ; Land Use ; Irrigation ; Agriculture and Environment Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q3 - Nonrenewable Resources and Conservation > Q34 - Natural Resources and Domestic and International Conflicts |
Item ID: | 49938 |
Depositing User: | Dr Hugues K. KOUADIO |
Date Deposited: | 20 Sep 2013 04:18 |
Last Modified: | 28 Sep 2019 22:49 |
References: | 1. Abdulai, A., V. Owusu, & R. Goetz (2011) Land tenure differences and investment in land improvement measures: Theoretical and empirical analysis, Journal of Development Analysis, 96(1): 66-78. 2. Acemoglu, D., S. Johnson, & J. Robinson (2001). The colonial origins of comparative development: An empirical investigation, American Economic Review 91(5): 1369-1401. 3. Angelsen, A. (1999) Agricultural expansion and deforestation: Modelling the impact of population, market forces and property rights, Journal of Development Economics, 58: 185-218. 4. Besley, T. (1995) Property rights and investment incentives: Theory and evidence from Ghana. Journal of Political Economy, 103(5): 903-937. 5. Boserup, E. (1981) Population and technology. Basic Blackwell, Oxford, UK. 6. Brasselle, A., F. Gaspart, & J-P. Platteau (2002) Land tenure security and investment incentives: Puzzling evidence from Burkina Faso, Journal of Development Economics, 67(2): 373-418. 7. Chauveau, J-P. (2000) Question foncière et construction nationale en Côte d’Ivoire. Politique Africaine, 78: 94-125. 8. Chauveau, J-P. (2006) How does an institution evolve? Land, politics, and intergenerational relations and the institution of the tutorat among autochtons and immigrants. In R. Kuba & C. Lentz (eds), Land rights and the politics of belonging in West Africa. Leiden: Brill Academic Publisher. 9. Clastres, P. (1976) La question du pouvoir dans les sociétés primitives, Interrogations, 7: 3-8. 10. Colin, J-P. (2004) Côte d’Ivoire: land rights and practices and intrafamily relations - conceptual and methodological foundations of a comprehensive approach, Land Reform, 2: 54-66. 11. Colin, J-P., G. Kouame, & D. Soro (2005) Outside the autochton-migrant configuration: Access to land, and inter-ethnic relationships in a former pioneer area (Lower Côte d’Ivoire). Manuscript. 12. Deininger, K.D., & S. Jin (2006) Tenure security and land-related investment: Evidence from Ethiopia, European Economic Review, 50: 1245-1277. 13. Deininger, K., & D.A. Ali (2008) Do overlapping land rights reduce agricultural investment? Evidence from Uganda, American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 90(4): 869-882. 14. Easterly, W. (2008) Institutions: Top down or bottom up? American Economic Review, Papers and Proceedings, 98(2): 95-99. 15. Fenske, J. (2010) L’étranger: Status, property rights and investment incentives in Côte d’Ivoire, Land Economics, 86(4): 621-644. 16. Fenske, J. (2011) Land tenure and investment incentives: Evidence from West Africa, Journal of Development Economics, 95(2): 137-156. 17. Goldstein, M., & C. Udry (2008) The profits of power: Land rights and agricultural investment in Ghana, Journal of Political Economy, 116(6): 981-1022. 18. Gourou, P. (1991) L’Afrique tropicale. Nain ou géant agricole? Flammarion, Paris. 19. Legré, O.H. (2003) Le rôle de la chefferie traditionnelle dans la gestion foncière en Côte d'Ivoire. Regards sur... Le foncier rural en Côte d’Ivoire. Les Editions du CERAP, Abidjan. 20. McCallin, B., & M. Montemurro (2009) A qui sont ces terres? Conflits fonciers et déplacement des populations dans l'Ouest forestier de la Côte d’Ivoire. Internal Displacement Monitoring Centre, Geneva, Switzerland, www.internal-displacement.org. 21. Migot-Adholla, S.E., G. Benneh, F. Place, & S. Atsu (1994) Land, security of tenure, and productivity in Ghana. In J.W. Bruce & S.E. Migot-Adholla (Eds.), Searching for land tenure security in Africa. Dubuque, owa: Kendall/Hunt. 22. Pande, R., & C.R. Udry (2006) Institutions and development : A view from below. Advances in Economics and Econometrics: Theory and Applications, NinthWorld Congress. Cambridge; New york, NY, USA: Cambridge University Press. 23. Petithuguenin, P. (1998) The natural conditions for cocoa production in Côte d'Ivoire, Ghana and Indonesia, Plantations, recherche, développement (Novembre - Décembre), 393—411. 24. Place, F. (2009) Land tenure and agricultural productivity in Africa: A comparative analysis of the economics literature and recent policy strategies and reforms, World Development, 37(8): 1326-1336. 25. Place, F., & P. Hazell (1993) Productivity effects of indigenous land tenure systems in sub-saharan Africa, American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 75(1): 10-19. 26. Place, F., & K. Otsuka (2001) Tenure, agricultural investment, and productivity in the customary tenure sector of Malawi, Economic Development and Cultural Change, 50(1): 77-99. 27. Place, F., & K. Otsuka (2002) Land tenure systems and their impacts on agricultural investments and productivity in Uganda, The Journal of Development Studies, 38(6): 105-128. 28. Ruf, F. (1995) From forest rent to tree-capital: Basic laws of cocoa cycles. The economics of cocoa supply. Cambridge: Woodhead Publishing. 29. Schlager, E., & E. Ostrom (1992) Property rights regimes and natural resources: A conceptual analysis, Land Economics, 68(3): 249-262. 30. Schmid, A. (1987) Property, power and public choice. An inquiry into law and economics. Praeger, New York, 2nd Edition. 31. Sender, J., & D. Johnston (2004) Searching for a weapon of mass production in rural Africa: Unconvincing arguments for land reform, Journal of Agrarian Change, 4(1 & 2): 142-164. 32. Sikor, T., & D. Müller (2009) The limits of State-led land reform: An introduction, World Development, 37(8): 1307-1316. 33. Wooldridge, J.M. (2001) Econometric analysis of cross section and panel data. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. 34. World Development Report (2008) Agriculture for development. The World Bank, DC. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/49938 |