Simultaneous and Temporal Valuation Contrasted

Freeman, Alan and Kliman, Andrew (1998): Simultaneous and Temporal Valuation Contrasted.

Abstract

This joint paper was presented to the Marx International II conference in Paris, 30th September-2nd October 1998. It sets out the principal propositions of the Temporal Single System Interpretation of Marx’s theory of value in a systematic and comprehensive way, making it a reference document of this school of thought. It establishes many theorems that underpin subsequent debates, for example (1) An early systematic refutation of the Fundamental Marxist Theorem (FMT) for the simultaneous interpretation and a demonstration that this yields negative profits with positive surplus value under quite normal conditions of capitalist reproduction; (2) An explanation of why simultaneous valuation cannot support Marx’s theory of the tendency of the rate of profit to fall whilst temporal valuation does; (3) A demonstration that under simultaneous valuation, the value of the product is not in general equal to the time of labour whereas under the temporal interpretation it is always so.

The remainder of this paper is taken directly from the original except where defunct web links have been amended or removed. The original abstract has been included as part of the paper.

(Original Abstract:) Contrary to popular belief, under simultaneous valuation - the universal official definition of value - exploitation (surplus-labor) is neither necessary nor sufficient for profit to exist. Surplus-labour cannot therefore be the sole source of profit, if the official definition of Marx’s values is accepted.

We show this, and then present an alternative interpretation of Marx's value theory - the “temporal single-system” interpretation, according to which exploitation is indeed the sole source of profit, that is, it is a necessary and sufficient condition for profit. We also show that other important “errors” attributed to Marx no longer exist under this interpretation.

A universal claim of economics - that simultaneous valuation represents Marx’s own value theory - is invalidated by these two findings. All conclusions and debates concerning “Marx’s” theory that have hitherto been treated as settled must therefore be re-examined, since they apply not to Marx’s theory but to a different theory, advanced in the 20th Century in a continuous tradition passing from von Bortkiewicz, via Sweezy, Seton, Morishima, and others to Sraffa and his successors. This tradition is a valid contribution to economics, but it is illegitimate to conclude from its acknowledged defects that Marx’s own theory is erroneous, inadequate, flawed, or superseded.

On the other hand, many of the most puzzling yet empirically evident features of modern capitalism are explained better than by such value categories. These include cyclic crisis as an endogenous consequence of accumulation, growing inequality between nations, the social regress which generally accompanies technical progress, and liquidity preference, re-interpreted as a dynamic consequence of value movement in a money economy. Economics’ refusal to discuss - indeed, its effective suppression of - a coherent theoretical approach which successfully interprets real-world phenomena that mainstream theory cannot account for, means that it cannot be considered a scientific discipline and its claims to authority as a source of objective truth cannot be accepted.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Institution: The University of Greenwich
• Language: English
• Keywords: Value; TSSI; temporalism; rate of profit; Marx; MELT; Okishio
• Subjects: B - History of Economic Thought, Methodology, and Heterodox Approaches > B1 - History of Economic Thought through 1925 > B12 - Classical (includes Adam Smith); B - History of Economic Thought, Methodology, and Heterodox Approaches > B1 - History of Economic Thought through 1925 > B14 - Socialist ; Marxist; B - History of Economic Thought, Methodology, and Heterodox Approaches > B2 - History of Economic Thought since 1925 > B24 - Socialist ; Marxist ; Sraffian; B - History of Economic Thought, Methodology, and Heterodox Approaches > B4 - Economic Methodology > B40 - General; B - History of Economic Thought, Methodology, and Heterodox Approaches > B5 - Current Heterodox Approaches > B50 - General; B - History of Economic Thought, Methodology, and Heterodox Approaches > B5 - Current Heterodox Approaches > B51 - Socialist ; Marxian ; Sraffian

References

Abraham-Frois, G. and Berrebi, E. (1979), Theory of Value, Prices and Accumulation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Bortkiewicz, L. von (1952), ‘Value and Price in the Marxian System’(part I), in International Economic Papers, 1952(2), 5-60.

Dmitriev, V. K. 1974. Economic Essays on Value, Competition and Utility (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).

Duménil , Gérard and Lévy, Dominique (1998), “The conservation of value: a rejoinder to Alan Freeman”, forthcoming in Review of Radical Political Economy. An earlier draft is available as an IWGVT working paper.

Duménil, G. 1983. Beyond the Transformation Riddle: A labor theory of value. Science and Society 47:4.

Ernst, John R. (1982), ‘Simultaneous Valuation Extirpated: A Contribution to the Critique of the Neo-Ricardian Concept of Value’, Review of Radical Political Economics, 14(2) pp85-94.

Foley, D. K. 1982. The Value of Money, the Value of Labor Power, and the Marxian Transformation Problem, Review of Radical Politi¬cal Economics 14:2.

Foley, D. K. 1997. Recent Developments in the Labor Theory of Value. Presented at Eastern Economic Association conference, April, Washington, D.C.

Freeman and Carchedi (1996) (eds) Marx and Non-Equilibrium Economics, Cheltenham: Elgar.

Freeman, Alan (1996) ‘Price, value and profit – a continuous, general, treatment’ in Freeman and Carchedi (1996)

Freeman, Alan (1997a) ‘The Poverty of Nations: Relative Surplus Value, Technical Change and Accumulation in the modern global market’ in LINKS (0000).

Freeman, Alan (1997b) ‘If they’re so rich, why aren’t they clever?’, paper to 1997 IWGVT conference

Freeman, Alan (1998) ‘What happens in recessions? A value-theoretic approach to Liquidity Preference’. paper to 1998 EEA conference

Giussani, P. 1991-92. The Determination of Prices of Production, International Journal of Political Economy 21:4.

Howard, M. C. and J. E. King. 1992. A History of Marxian Economics: Volume II, 1929-1990 (Princeton, NJ: Prince¬ton University Press).

Kaldor, N(1985) Economics without Equilibrium, New York: M.E.Sharpe

Kliman, A. and McGlone, T. (1988), ‘The Transformation non Problem and the non Transformation Problem’, Capital and Class, 35, Summer, pp56 83.

Kliman, A. J and T. McGlone. 1988. The Transformation Non-Problem and the Non- Transformation Problem, Capital and Class 35.

Kliman, Andrew (1988), ‘The Profit Rate Under Continuous Technologi¬cal Change’, Review of Radical Political Economics, 20:2 & 3.

Kliman, Andrew (1996) ‘Marx vs. the "20th-century Marxists": a Reply to Laibman’, 1996 IWGVT paper .

Kliman, A. J. 1997. A Contribution to the Ongoing Inquiry into the Existence of Marx's Marxism. Submitted for discussion to the International Working Group in Value Theory miniconference at the Eastern Economic Association conference, April, Washington, D.C.

Kliman, Andrew (1998) ‘The significance of the inconsistency allegations’, 1998 IWGVT conference paper.

Kristjansen, Dave (1998) ‘Effective Demand and the Market Price of Production’, 1998 IWGVT conference paper

Kuhn, Thomas S. (1962) The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press.

Lee, Chai-On. 1993. Marx's Labour Theory of Value Revisited, Cambridge Journal of Economics 17:4.

Louça, Francisco (1996a). ‘A Flecha e ao alvo do Tempo – Paradoxos Economicos’, Revista Critica de Ciências Sociais No 46, October 1996. http://www.ces.fe.uc.pt/publicacoes/rccs/artigos/46/Francisco%20Louca%20-%20A%20Flecha%20e%20o%20Alvo%20do%20Tempo%20-%20Paradoxos%20Economicos.pdf

Louça, Francisco (1996a). Turbulence in Economics: An Evolutionary Appraisal of Cycles and Complexity. Aldershot and London: Edward Elgar.

Maldonado-Filho, E. 1997. Release and Tying up of Productive Capital and the "Transformation Problem." Presented at Eastern Economic Association conference, April, Washington, D.C.

Maldonado-Filho, Eduardo

Morgan, Mary (1994) ‘The stamping out of process theory in econometrics’ in Blaug and de Marchi (1994) (eds) ‘Appraising Economic Theories’, Cheltenham:Elgar

Morishima, M. 1973. Marx’s Economics: A Dual Theory of Value and Growth (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).

Morgan, Mary (1994) ‘The stamping out of process theory in econometrics’ in Blaug and de Marchi (1994) (eds) ‘Appraising Economic Theories’, Cheltenham:Elgar

Moseley, Fred (1993), ‘Marx’s Logical Method and the “Transformation Problem”’, in Moseley (ed.) (1993), Marx’s Method in Capital: a reexamination. Atlantic Highlands, N.J.: Humanities.

Naples, Michele I. (1989), ‘A Radical Economic Revision of the Transformation Problem’, Review of Radical Political Economics, 21(1 2), pp137 158.

Naples, Michele I. (1996) ‘’ in Freeman and Carchedi (1996)

Okishio, N. 1993a. A Mathematical Note on Marxian Theorems. In Nobuo Okishio — Essays on Political Economy: Collected Papers, M. Krüger and P. Flaschel, eds. (Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang).

Okishio, N. 1993b. Three Topics on Marxian Fundamental Theorem. In Nobuo Okishio — Essays on Political Economy: Collected Papers, M. Krüger and P. Flaschel, eds. (Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang).

Van Parijs, P (1980) ‘The Falling-Rate-ofProfit Theory of Crisis: a Rational Reconstruction by Way of Obituary’, Review of Radical Political Economics, 12 (1), Spring, pp1-16

Ramos, A. 1997. Labor, Money, Labor-Saving Innovation, and the Falling Rate of Profit. Presented at Eastern Economic Association Convention, April, Washington, D.C.

Ramos, A. and A. Rodriguez. 1996. The Transformation of Values into Prices of Production: A different reading of Marx's texts, in A. Freeman and G. Carchedi, eds., Marx and Non-equilibrium Economics (Cheltenham, U.K.: Edward Elgar).

Robinson, Joan (1980). Collected Economic Papers V. Boston : MIT Press

Rodriguez, Adolfo(1996) ‘Money, the postulates of invariance and the transformation of Marx into Ricardo’, in Freeman and Carchedi (1996)

Roemer, J. 1981. Analytical Foundations of Marxian Economic Theory (Cam¬bridge: Cambridge University Press).

Sambursky, S(0000) The Physical World of the Greeks

Steedman, Ian (1977), Marx after Sraffa. London: New Left Books.

Thompson (1995) ‘Technical Change, Accumulation and the Rate of Profit’, Review of Radical Political Economy Vol 26(4) pp97-126

Walras, L. (1984) Éléments d’Économie politique pure, Translated by Jaffé as Elements of Pure Economics or the Theory of Social Wealth, London: George Allen and Unwin and Philadelphia: Orion Editions.

Weintraub, E.R. (1983) ‘On the existence of a competitive equilibrium, 1930-1954’, Journal of Economic Literature XXI

Wolff, R., Roberts, B. and Callari, A. (l982), ‘Marx’s (not Ricardo’s) “Transformation Problem”: A Radical Reconceptualization’, History of Political Economy, Vol 14 No. 4., pp 564-582.

Wolff, R., A. Callari, and B. Roberts. 1984. A Marxian Alternative to the Traditional Transformation Problem. Review of Radical Political Economics 16:2&3.

Bridel, Pascal (1997) Money and General Equilibrium Theory: from Walras to Pareto. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar