Revisiting sulfur Kuznets curves with endogenous breaks modeling: Substantial evidence of inverted-Us/Vs for individual OECD countries

Liddle, Brantley and Messinis, George (2014): Revisiting sulfur Kuznets curves with endogenous breaks modeling: Substantial evidence of inverted-Us/Vs for individual OECD countries.

Abstract

This paper tests for a sulfur Kuznets curve by examining the sulfur emissions per capita-GDP per capita relationship individually, for 25 OECD countries over 1950-2005 using a reduced-form, linear model that allows for multiple endogenously determined breaks. This approach addresses several important econometric and modeling issues, e.g., (i) it is highly flexible and can approximate complicated nonlinear relationships without presuming a priori any particular relationship; (ii) it avoids the nonlinear transformations of potentially nonstationary income. The predominant post-1950 income-sulfur emissions relationship—the case for 24 of the 25 countries studied—was either (i) inverted-Vs, where the emissions-income relationship became negative, or (ii) decoupling, where income no longer affected emissions in a long-run, statistically significant way. Seventeen of the 21 transitional breaks uncovered occurred over 1965-1978; hence, in concert with previous work, we conclude that shared timing among countries is important in income-environment transitions.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: Sulfur emissions; Environmental Kuznets curve; OECD countries; nonlinear flexible form; multiple endogenous breaks; income-emission relationships
• Subjects: C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C2 - Single Equation Models ; Single Variables > C22 - Time-Series Models ; Dynamic Quantile Regressions ; Dynamic Treatment Effect Models ; Diffusion Processes; C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C5 - Econometric Modeling > C50 - General; O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O4 - Economic Growth and Aggregate Productivity > O44 - Environment and Growth; Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q5 - Environmental Economics > Q53 - Air Pollution ; Water Pollution ; Noise ; Hazardous Waste ; Solid Waste ; Recycling; Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q5 - Environmental Economics > Q56 - Environment and Development ; Environment and Trade ; Sustainability ; Environmental Accounts and Accounting ; Environmental Equity ; Population Growth

References

Arai, Y. and Kurozumi, E. 2005. Testing for the null hypothesis of cointegration with structural breaks. CIRJE Discussion Papers F-319, University of Tokyo.

Bai, J. and Perron, P. 1998. Estimating and testing linear models with multiple structural changes. Econometrica, 66(1), 47-78.

Bai, J. and Perron, P. 2003. Computation and analysis of multiple structural change models. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 18, 1-22.

Bertinelli, L. and Strobl, E. 2005. The environmental Kuznets curve semi-parametrically revisited. Economics Letters 88, 350-357.

Carrion-i-Silvestre, J., Kim, D., and Perron, P. 2009. GLS-Based Unit Root Tests with Multiple Structural Breaks. Econometric Theory, 25, 1754-92.

Carson, R. 2010. “The Environmental Kuznets Curve: Seeking Empirical Regularity and Theoretical Structure.” Review of Environmental Economics and Policy, 4(1), 3-23.

de Bruyn, S., van den Bergh, C., and Opschoor, J. 1998. Economic growth and emissions: reconsidering the empirical basis of environmental Kuznets curves. Ecological Economics 25, 161-175.

Dijkgraaf, E. and Vollebergh, H. 2005. A test for parameter homogeneity in CO2 panel EKC estimations. Environmental and Resource Economics, 32, 229-239.

Dinda, S. 2004. Environmental Kuznets Curve Hypothesis: A Survey. Ecological Economics, 49, 431-455.

Easterly, W. (2001). The Lost Decades: Developing Countries’ Stagnation in Spite of Policy Reform 1980-1998. Journal of Economic Growth, 6, 135-157.

Fosten, J., Morley B., and Taylor, T. 2012. Dynamic misspecification in the environmental Kuznets curve: Evidence from CO2 and SO2 emissions in the United Kingdom. Ecological Economics 76, 25-33.

Grossman, G.M. and Krueger, A.B. 1991. Environmental impacts of a North American Free Trade Agreement. National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper 3914, NBER, Cambridge, MA.

Harvey, D.I., Leybourne, S.J. and Tayloer, A.M.R. (2013), Testing for Unit Roots in the Possible Presence of Multiple Trend Breaks Using Minimum Dickey-Fuller Statistics, Journal of Econometrics, 177, 265-284.

Heston, A., Summers, R., and Aten, B. Penn World Table Version 7.1, Center for International Comparisons of Production, Income and Prices at the University of Pennsylvania, Nov 2012.

Kejriwal, M. (2008), Cointegration with structural breaks: An application to the Feldstein-Horioka puzzle, Studies in Nonlinear Dynamics & Econometrics, 12 (1), 1-37.

Kejriwal, M. and Lopez, C. 2013. Unit Roots, Level Shifts and Trend Breaks in Per Capita Output - A Robust Evaluation. Econometric Reviews, 32 (8), 892-927.

Kejriwal, M., and Perron, P. (2010), A Sequential Procedure to Determine the Number of Breaks in Trend with an Integrated or Stationary Noise Component, Journal of Time Series Analysis 31, 305-313.

Liddle, B. and Messinis, G. 2014. Revisiting carbon Kuznets curves with endogenous breaks modeling: Evidence of decoupling and saturation (but few inverted-Us) for individual OECD countries. USAEE Working Paper No. 14-178. Available via SSRN. http://ssrn.com/abstract=2513514

Millimet, D., List, J., and Stengos, T. 2003. The environmental Kuznets curve: real progress or misspecified models? Review of Economics and Statistics 85, 1038-1047.

Perman, R. and Stern, D. 2003. Evidence from panel unit root and cointegration tests that the environmental Kuznets curve does not exist. Australian Journal of Agriculture and Resource Economics 47, 325-347.

Pritchett, L. 1997. Divergence, Big Time. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 11(3), 3-17.

Rodrik, D. (1999). Where Did All the Growth Go? External Shocks, Social Conflict, and Growth Collapses. Journal of Economic Growth, 4, 385-412.

Shafik, N. 1994. Economic development and environmental quality: An econometric analysis. Oxford Economic Papers, 46, 757-773.

Selden, T. and Song, D. 1994. Environmental quality and development: Is there a Kuznets curve for air pollution? Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 29, 147-162.

Smith, S. J., J. van Aardenne, Z. Klimont, R. J. Andres, A. Volke, and S. Delgado Arias. 2011. Anthropogenic Sulfur Dioxide Emissions, 1850-2005: National and Regional Data Set by Source Category, Version 2.86. Palisades, NY: NASA Socioeconomic Data and Applications Center (SEDAC). http://dx.doi.org/10.7927/H49884X9.

Stern, D., Common, M., and Barbier, E. 1996. Economic growth and environmental degradation: the environmental Kuznets curve and sustainable development. World Development 24, 1151-1160.

Stern, D. and Common, M. 2001. Is there an environmental Kuznets curve for sulfur? Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 41, 162-178.

Stern, D. 2004. The rise and fall of the environmental Kuznets curve. World Development 32(8), 1419-1439.

Stern, D. 2006. Reversal of the trend in global anthropogenic sulfur emissions. Global Environmental Change 16, 207-220.

Stern, D. 2010. Between estimates of the emissions-income elasticity. Ecological Economics, 69, 2173-2182.

Vollebergh, H., Melenberg, B., and Dijkgraaf, E. 2009. Identifying reduced-form relations with panel data: the case of pollution and income. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 58, 27-42.

Wagner, Martin. 2008. The carbon Kuznets curve: A cloudy picture emitted by bad econometrics? Resource and Energy Economics 30, 3: 388-408.

Wang, Y-C. 2013. Functional sensitivity of testing the environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis. Resource and Energy Economics 35, 451-466.