Mihai, Florin-Constantin and Ichim, Pavel (2013): Landfills – territorial issues of cities from North-East Region, Romania. Published in: Forum Geografic. Geographical studies and environment protection research , Vol. 12, No. 2 (2013): pp. 201-2010.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_61369.pdf Download (1MB) | Preview |
Abstract
Landfilling prevails in waste management options in Romania like others new EU members, being contrary to the concept of waste hierarchy promoted in recent years by EC. Waste disposal is done usually in non-compliant landfills and Government established a program to close these sites. This paper aims to analyse the transition from traditional waste management systems to an integrated system at national, regional and local scale. Assessment of landfills location based on buffer analysis (using GIS techniques) is made according to the proximity of five critical factors (CF) such as: residential area, industry & commercial units, agricultural lands, rivers & lakes, forest and protected areas, all these factors being sensitive to pollution. Thus, most of these old sites are badly or improperly located related to surroundings and only few have an acceptable location in the study area! Therefore, the proposed method can be a necessary tool in EIA studies of these environmental threats at regional scale.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Landfills – territorial issues of cities from North-East Region, Romania |
English Title: | Landfills – territorial issues of cities from North-East Region, Romania |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | landfill, urban area, GIS, multi-scale analysis, waste management |
Subjects: | Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q0 - General > Q00 - General Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q0 - General > Q01 - Sustainable Development Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q5 - Environmental Economics Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q5 - Environmental Economics > Q51 - Valuation of Environmental Effects Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q5 - Environmental Economics > Q52 - Pollution Control Adoption and Costs ; Distributional Effects ; Employment Effects Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q5 - Environmental Economics > Q53 - Air Pollution ; Water Pollution ; Noise ; Hazardous Waste ; Solid Waste ; Recycling Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q5 - Environmental Economics > Q56 - Environment and Development ; Environment and Trade ; Sustainability ; Environmental Accounts and Accounting ; Environmental Equity ; Population Growth Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q5 - Environmental Economics > Q57 - Ecological Economics: Ecosystem Services ; Biodiversity Conservation ; Bioeconomics ; Industrial Ecology Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q5 - Environmental Economics > Q58 - Government Policy R - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics > R0 - General R - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics > R0 - General > R00 - General R - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics > R5 - Regional Government Analysis R - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics > R5 - Regional Government Analysis > R52 - Land Use and Other Regulations R - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics > R5 - Regional Government Analysis > R58 - Regional Development Planning and Policy |
Item ID: | 61369 |
Depositing User: | Dr. Florin-Constantin MIHAI |
Date Deposited: | 18 Jan 2015 14:18 |
Last Modified: | 28 Sep 2019 21:25 |
References: | D’Alisa,G., Di Nola,M.F.,Giampietro,M.,(2012). A multi-scale analysis of urban waste metabolism: density of waste disposed in Campania, Journal of Cleaner Production, 35, 59-70 Davies, A.R., (2008). Civil society activism and waste management in Ireland: The Carranstown anti-incineration campaign, Land Use Policy, 161-172 Keser S., Duzgun, S., Aksoy, A., (2012). Application of spatial and non-spatial data analysis in determination of the factors that impact municipal solid waste generation rates in Turkey, Waste Management, 32, 359–371 Lin H.Y., Chen, G.H. (2009). Regional optimization model for locating supplemental recycling depots, Waste management, 29, 1473-1479 Mazzanti, M., Montini, A., Nicolli, F., (2009). The dynamics of landfill diversion: Economic drivers, policy factors and spatial issues.Evidence from Italy using provincial panel data, Resources, Conservation and Recycling,54,53-61 Mihai F.C., (2013). Development of MSW collection services on regional scale: spatial analysis and urban disparities in North-East Region, Romania, AGD Environment and Landscape, 7 (1):13-18 Mihai F.C, Apostol L., Ursu A., Ichim P., (2013). Landfills as anthropogenic landforms in urban environment from Neamţ county. AES Bioflux 5 (2): 100-108. Mihai F.C., Apostol, L., Chelaru D.A., Ursu, A., (2013). EU acquis compliance on urban waste management. Case study: Piatra Neamt , Romania, Proccedings of 13th International Multidisciplinary Scientific GeoConference on Ecology, Economics, Education and Legislation, SGEM 2013, 16-22 June, Albena, Bulgaria,vol1: 423-430, (DOI:10.5593/SGEM2013/BE5.V1/S20.056) Mihai, F.C., & Lămășanu, A. (2013). Spatial analysis of dumpsites volumes from rural territory. Case study: Neamţ County, Romania. Forum geografic, 12 (1), 59-66. doi:10.5775/fg.2067-4635.2013.063.i. Mihai F.C., Apostol, L. (2012). Disparities in municipal waste management across EU-27. A geographical approach, Present Environment and Sustainable Development, 6 (1), 169-180 Mihai, F.C., Lămășanu, A., Apostol, L. (2012). Regional disparities in urban population access to sanitation services. Case study: Romania, Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, Special issue, 3 (6), 273-279 Mihai F.C, Apostol, L., Ursu, A., Ichim, P. (2012). Vulnerability of mountain rivers to waste dumping from Neamț County, Rom. Geographia Napocensis, 6 (2) ,51-59, Mihai F.C. (2012)a. Population access to waste collection services: urban vs rural areas in Romania, Bulletin USAMV Agriculture, 69 (2) 464-466 Mihai, F.C. (2012)b. Geography of waste as a new approach in waste management study, Papers of “ Dimitrie Cantemir” Geographical Seminar, 33, 39-46 Mihai F.C., Ghiurcă A.,Lămășanu, A. (2011). Estimation of urban waste generated and uncollected in Romania, Analele Universității Oradea, Fascicula: Protecția Mediului, 17(2), 719-724 Moeinaddini M., Khorasani, N., Danehkar A., Darvishsefat A. A., Zienalyan M., (2010). Siting MSW landfill using weighted linear combination and analytical hierarchy process (AHP) methodology in GIS environment (case study: Karaj), Waste Management, 30, 912–920 Pandey P.C., Sharma, L.K., Nathawat, M.S. (2012). Geospatial strategy for sustainable management of municipal solid waste for growing urban environment, Environ Monit Assess, 184, 2419–2431, DOI 10.1007/s10661-011-2127-2 Passarini F.,Vassura, I., Monti, F., Morselli. L., Villani, B., (2011).Indicators of waste management efficiency related to different territorial conditions, Waste Management, 31,785–792. Sauri-Riancho, M. R., Vargas , C. D. D., Victoria, E.M., Marrufo , G.M., Lara, C. R., Novelo, M R.I. (2011), Locating hazardous waste treatment facilities and disposal sites in the State of Yucatan, Mexico. Environ Earth Sci 63:351–362 DOI 10.1007/s12665-010-0706-0 Sener S., Sener E., Nas B., Karaguzel, R., (2010). Combining AHP with GIS for landfill site selection: A case study in the Lake Beysehir Catchment area (Konya, Turkey), Waste Management , 30, 2037–2046 Sumathi V.R., Natesan, U., Sarkar, C. (2008). GIS-based approach for optimized siting of municipal solid waste landfill, Waste Management, 28 ,2146–2160 Wolsink M., (2010). Contested environmental policy infrastructure: Socio-political acceptance of renewable energy, water, and waste facilities, Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 30,302–311 Yashon O., Emmanuel C. K.,Ryutaro T.,(2011).MCDA-GIS integrated approach for optimized landfill site selection for growing urban regions: an application ofneighborhood-proximity analysis, Annals of GIS, 17:1, 43-62 ANPM,2011, Raport national privind starea mediului APM Constanta, 2003. Raport anual privind starea factorilor de mediu in județul Constanta. ARPM Bacău,2006, Planul regional de gestionare a deșeurilor în regiunea 1N-E Consiliul Judetean Prahova, 2008, Planul județean de gestionare a deșeurilor in județul Prahova, Council Directive 99/31/EC of 26 April 1999 on the landfill of waste Hotararea de Guvern nr.345/2005 privind depozitarea deșeurilor ORDIN nr. 757 din 26 noiembrie 2004 pentru aprobarea Normativului tehnic privind depozitarea deșeurilor ORDIN nr. 536 din 23 iunie 1997 pentru aprobarea Normelor de igienă și a recomandarilor privind mediul de viață al populației (actualizat pâna la data de 30 aprilie 2008*). |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/61369 |