Giannakopoulos, Nicholas and Laliotis, Ioannis (2017): Decentralized Bargaining and the Greek Labour Relations Reform (Law 4024/2011).
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_76502.pdf Download (955kB) | Preview |
Abstract
We investigate decentralized collective bargaining in Greece (2002-2016) under the industrial relations reform implemented in 2011. We match administrative data on firm-level contracts with non-participating firms to estimate determinants of decentralized bargaining before and after the reform. Decentralized bargaining increased in the post-reform period depending on firm size, industry and location. Nominal wage floors downgraded after 2011 in contacts signed by association of persons rather than trade unions. A base wage premium of 22 percent is found in favour of trade unions. Firm-level bargaining with trade unions is expected to promote decentralized bargaining with outcomes linked to firm-specific characteristics.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Decentralized Bargaining and the Greek Labour Relations Reform (Law 4024/2011) |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | Labour relations; Decentralized collective bargaining; Nominal wages; Reform; Greece |
Subjects: | J - Labor and Demographic Economics > J3 - Wages, Compensation, and Labor Costs > J31 - Wage Level and Structure ; Wage Differentials J - Labor and Demographic Economics > J4 - Particular Labor Markets > J41 - Labor Contracts J - Labor and Demographic Economics > J5 - Labor-Management Relations, Trade Unions, and Collective Bargaining > J52 - Dispute Resolution: Strikes, Arbitration, and Mediation ; Collective Bargaining |
Item ID: | 76502 |
Depositing User: | Dr. Nicholas Giannakopoulos |
Date Deposited: | 01 Feb 2017 09:19 |
Last Modified: | 26 Sep 2019 16:54 |
References: | Avouyi-Dovi S., Fougère D. and Gautier E, 2013, “Wage Rigidity, Collective Bargaining, and the Minimum Wage:Evidence from French Agreement Data,” The Review of Economics and Statistics, 95(4), 1337-1351. Breda, T. (2015) Firms' Rents, Workers' Bargaining Power and the Union Wage Premium, The Economic Journal, Vo. 125 (589), 1616–1652. Card, D., and de la Rica, S. (2006). ‘Firm-level contracting and the structure of wages in Spain’. Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 59 (4): 573–92. Christofides NL, Stengos T (2003) Wage rigidity in Canadian collective bargaining agreements. Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 56(3):429–448 Fougère, D., E. Gautier and S. Roux (2016) Understanding Wage Floor Setting in Industry-Level Agreements: Evidence from France, IZA Discussion Papers, No. 10290, October. Daouli JJ, Demoussis M, Giannakopoulos N, Laliotis I (2013) Firm-level collective bargaining and wages in Greece: a quantile decomposition analysis. British Journal of Industrial Relations, 51(1):80–103 Daouli, J., M. Demoussis, N. Giannakopoulos, and I. Laliotis (2016) "The 2011 Industrial Relations Reform and Nominal Wage Adjustments in Greece" Journal of Labor Research, vol. 37, 460-483. Druant M, Fabiani S, Kezdi G, Lamo A, Martins F, Sabbatini R (2012) Firms’ price and wage adjustment in Europe: survey evidence on nominal stickiness. Labour Economics, 19:772–782. Guertzgen, N. (2009) Rent-sharing and Collective Bargaining Coverage: Evidence from LinkedEmployer–Employee Data, Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 111(2), 323–349. Heckman, J. J., 1979. Sample selection bias as a specification error. Econometrica, 47, l, 153 161. Le Bihan H, Montornès J, Heckel T (2012) Sticky wages: evidence from quarterly microeconomic data. American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics 4(3):1–32 Puhani, P. A., 2000. The Heckman correction for sample selection and its critique. Journal of Economic Surveys, 14, 1, 53-68. van Ours et al., (2016) Recommendations Expert Group for the Review of the Greek Labour Market, Review of Greek Labour Market Institutions, Ministry of Labour, Social Security and Welfare, September 2016, Athens. Voskeritsian H, Kornelakis A (2014) The transformation of employment regulation in Greece: towards and dysfunctional liberal market economy? Relation Industrielles/Industrial Relations, 69(2):344–365. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/76502 |