High Performing Peers and Female STEM Choices in School

Mouganie, Pierre and Wang, Yaojing (2017): High Performing Peers and Female STEM Choices in School.

Abstract

Women have historically been underrepresented in science, technology, engineering and math (STEM) jobs. There are concerns that the persistence of this gap over time is in part due to path dependence and the historical lack of high-performing women in these fields. This paper uses administrative data from China to examine the extent to which the presence of high-performing peers in mathematics affects the likelihood that women choose a science track during high school. Results indicate that exposure to a higher proportion of high-performing females increases girls' likelihood of majoring in STEM, while exposure to more high-performing males reduces it. There is little evidence that boys' major decisions are affected by their peers. Our results indicate that high-achieving girls in quantitative fields may have a role model or affirmation effect that encourages their female classmates to pursue a path in science.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: STEM, Peer Quality, Gender Effects, China
• Subjects: I - Health, Education, and Welfare > I2 - Education and Research Institutions > I20 - General; I - Health, Education, and Welfare > I2 - Education and Research Institutions > I26 - Returns to Education; J - Labor and Demographic Economics > J0 - General > J01 - Labor Economics: General; J - Labor and Demographic Economics > J7 - Labor Discrimination > J70 - General

References

Anelli, M., and Peri, G., Forthcoming. The Effects of High School Peers' Gender on College Major, College Performance and Income. \emph{The Economic Journal}.

Bages, C., Verniers, C., and Martinot, D., 2016. Virtues of a Hardworking Role Model to Improve Girls' Mathematics Performance. \emph{Psychology of Women Quarterly} 40 (1), 55-64.

Beede, D. N., Julian, T. A., Langdon, D., McKittrick, G., Khan, B., and Doms, M. E., 2011. Women in STEM: A gender gap to innovation. \emph{Economics and Statistics Administration Issue Brief} (04-11).

Blickenstaff, Clark J., 2005. Women and science careers: leaky pipeline or gender filter? \emph{Gender and education} 17 (4), 369-386.

Carrell, S.E., Page, M. E., West, J. E., 2010. Sex and Science: How Professor Gender Perpetuates the Gender Gap. \emph{Quarterly Journal of Economics}, 125(3), 1101-1144.

Crocker, J., and Major. B., 1989. Social Stigma and Self-esteem: The Self Protective Properties of Stigma. \emph{Psychological Review}, 96(4), 608-630.

Cunha, F. and Heckman, J., 2007. The Technology of Skill Formation. \emph{American Economic Review}, 97(2), 31-47.

Paredes, V., 2014. A Teacher like Me or a Student Like Me? Role Model versus Teacher Bias Effect". \emph{Economics of Education Review}, 39, 38-49.

Eble, A., and Hu, F., 2017. Role Models, the Formation of Beliefs, and Girls' Math Ability: Evidence from Random Assignment of Students in Chinese Middle Schools. \emph{Working Paper}.

Eccles, J. S., and Wang M. 2016. What Motivates Females and Males to pursue Careers in Mathematics and Science. \emph{International Journal of Behavioral Development}, 40 (2), 100-106.

Fischer, S., 2017. The Downside of Good Peers: How Classroom Composition Differently Affects Men's and Women's STEM persistence. \emph{Labour Economics}, 44, 151-160.

Guo, C., Tsang, C. M., and Dink, X., 2010. Gender Disparities in Science and Engineering in Chinese Universities. \emph{Economics of Education Review}, 29, 225-235.

Hoekstra, M., Mouganie, P., and Wang, Y., Forthcoming. Peer Quality and the Academic Benefits to Attending Better Schools. \emph{Journal of Labor Economics}.

Hoxby, C., 2000. Peer Effects in the Classroom: Learning from Gender and Race Variation. \emph{NBER Working Paper No. w7867}.

Hill, A. J., 2017. The Positive Influence of Female College Students on Their Male Peers. {Labour Economics}, 44, 151-160.

Hyde, J. S., Lindberg, S. M., Linn, M. C., Ellis, A. B., and Williams, C. C., 2008. Gender similarities characterize math performance. \emph{Science}, 321(5888), 494-495.

Zhang L., and H.Zhen., 2011. A Study on the Dilemma The Female University Students in Science and Technology Encountered during Their Learning. \emph{Tsinghua Journal of Education}, 32(5).

Lavy, V., and Schlosser, A., 2011. Mechanisms and impacts of gender peer effects at school. \emph{American Economic Journal: Applied Economics.} 3, 1-33.

Manski, C., 1993. Identification of Endogenous Social Effects: The Reflection Problem. \emph{The Review of Economic Studies}, 60 (3), 531-542.

Ost, B., 2010. The role of peers and grades in determining major persistence in the Sciences. {Economics of Education Review}, 29(6), 923-934.

Schneeweis, N. and Zweim\"uller, M., 2012. Girls, Girls, Girls: Gender Composition and Female School Choice. \emph{Economics of Education Review}. 31(4): 482-500.

Turner, S. E., and Bowen, W. G., 1999. Choice of major: The changing (unchanging) gender gap. \emph{Industrial \& Labor Relations Review}, 52(2), 289-313.

The U.S. News/Raytheon STEM Index Shows Gender and Racial Gaps Widening in STEM Fields. (2015). U.S. News.

Zafar, B., 2013. College major choice and the gender gap. \emph{Journal of Human Resources}, 48(3), 545-595.

Zolitz, F., and Feld, J., 2017. The Effect of Peer Gender on Major Choice and Occupational Segregation. \emph{Working Paper.}