Conditional Preference for Flexibility: Eliciting Beliefs from Behavior

Sadowski, Philipp (2008): Conditional Preference for Flexibility: Eliciting Beliefs from Behavior.

Abstract

Following Kreps (1979), we consider a decision maker with uncertain beliefs about her own future taste. This uncertainty leaves the decision maker with preference for flexibility: When choosing among menus containing alternatives for future choice, she weakly prefers larger menus. Existing representations accommodating this choice pattern cannot distinguish tastes (indexed by a subjective state space) and beliefs (a probability measure over the subjective states) as different concepts, making it impossible to relate parameters of the representation to choice behavior. We allow choice among menus to depend on exogenous states, interpreted as information. Our axioms yield a representation that uniquely identifies beliefs, provided the impact of information on choice is rich. The result is suggested as a choice theoretic foundation for the assumption, commonly made in the incomplete contracting literature, that contracting parties, who know each other's ranking of contracts, also share beliefs about each others future tastes in the face of unforeseen contingencies.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: Preference for Flexibility; Uniqueness; Contracts; Subjective Uncertainty
• Subjects: D - Microeconomics > D8 - Information, Knowledge, and Uncertainty > D86 - Economics of Contract: Theory; D - Microeconomics > D8 - Information, Knowledge, and Uncertainty > D84 - Expectations ; Speculations; D - Microeconomics > D8 - Information, Knowledge, and Uncertainty > D81 - Criteria for Decision-Making under Risk and Uncertainty; D - Microeconomics > D8 - Information, Knowledge, and Uncertainty > D82 - Asymmetric and Private Information ; Mechanism Design; D - Microeconomics > D8 - Information, Knowledge, and Uncertainty > D83 - Search ; Learning ; Information and Knowledge ; Communication ; Belief ; Unawareness; D - Microeconomics > D8 - Information, Knowledge, and Uncertainty > D80 - General; D - Microeconomics > D0 - General > D01 - Microeconomic Behavior: Underlying Principles

References

Anscombe, Francis J. and Robert J. Aumann (1963), "A Definition of Subjective Probability." Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 34, 199-205.

Billingsley, Patrick (1995), Probability and Measure. John Wiley and Sons, New York, 3rd edition.

Dekel, Eddie, Barton L. Lipman and Aldo Rustichini (1998-a), "Recent Developments in Modeling Unforeseen Contingencies." European Economic Review, Vol. 42, 523-542.

------ (1998-b), "Standard State-Space Models Preclude Unawareness." Econometrica, Vol 66, No. 1, 159-173.

------ (2001), "Representing Preferences with a Unique Subjective State Space." Econometrica, Vol 69, No. 4, 891-934.

Dekel, Eddie, Barton L. Lipman, Aldo Rustichini and Todd Sarver (2007), "Representing Preferences with a Unique Subjective State Space: Corrigendum." Econometrica, Vol. 75, No.2, 591-600.

Epstein, Larry G. (2006), "An axiomatic model of non-Bayesian updating." Review of Economic Studies, Vol. 73, 413-436.

Epstein, Larry G. and Kyoungwon Seo (2007), "Subjective States: a more Robust Model." mimeo.

Fishburn, Peter C. (1970), Utility Theory for Decision Making. John Wiley and Sons, New York. Reprinted by Krieger Press, Huntington, New York, 1979.

Grant, Simon and Edi Karni (2005), "Why does it Matter that Beliefs and Valuations be Correctly Represented?" International Economic Review, Vol. 46, No. 3, 917-934.

Gul, Faruk and Wolfgang Pesendorfer (2001), "Temptation and Self-Control." Econometrica, Vol.69, No. 6, 1403-1435.

Hart, Oliver and John Moore (1999), "Foundations of Incomplete Contracts." Review of Economic Studies, Vol. 66, No.1, 115-138.

Karni, Edi and Philippe Mongin (2000), "On the Determination of Subjective Probability by Choice." Management Science, 46, 233-248.

Karni, Edi (2006), "Bayesian Decision Theory and the Representation of Beliefs." mimeo.

Kopylov, Igor (2007), "Temptation, Guilt, and Finite Subjective State Spaces." mimeo.

Kreps, David M. (1979), "A Representation Theorem for "Preference for Flexibility."" Econometrica, Vol. 47, No.3, 565-577.

------ (1988), Notes on the Theory of Choice. Westviev Press, Boulder, CO.

------ (1992), "Static Choice and Unforeseen Contingencies," in Partha Dasgupta, Douglas Gale, Oliver Hart and Eric Maskin, editors, Economic Analysis of Markets and Games: Essays in Honor of Frank Hahn. MIT Press, 259-281.

Maskin, Eric and Jean Tirole (1999), "Unforeseen Contingencies and Incomplete Contracts." Review of Economic Studies, 66, 83-114.

Nehring, Klaus (1996), "Preference for Flexibility and Freedom of Choice in a Savage Framework." UC-Davis working paper.

------ (1999), "Preference for Flexibility in a Savage Framework." Econometrica, Vol. 67, No.1, 101-119.

Ozdenoren, Emre (2002), "Completing the State Space with Subjective States." Journal of Economic Theory, Vol. 105, No. 2, 531-539.

Salant, Yuval and Ariel Rubinstein (2007), "(A,f), Choice with Frames." mimeo.

Savage, Leonard J. (1954), The Foundations of Statistics. John Wiley and Sons, New York. Revised edition, Dover, New York, 1972.

Sher, Shlomi and Craig R.M. McKenzie (2006), "Information leakage from logically equivalent frames." Cognition, 101, 467-494.

Tirole, Jean (1999), "Incomplete Contracts: Where do we Stand?" Econometrica, Vol. 67, No.4, 741-781.

Von Neumann, John and Oscar Morgenstern (1944), Theory of Games and Economic Behavior. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.