16+1, a New Issue in China-EU Relations?

Iulia Monica, Oehler-Șincai (2018): 16+1, a New Issue in China-EU Relations? Published in: Working paper series of the China-CEE Institute Budapest (2018): pp. 1-11.

Abstract

The present paper investigates the positions of individual member states, European institutions and organizations towards the 16+1 cooperation framework. At the institutional level, the European Commission’s Joint communication on elements for a new EU strategy on China of June 2016, the reports and joint statements of the European Economic and Social Committee and China Economic and Social Council (May 2016 and June 2017) and European Parliament publications underline: the absence of a common EU-level strategy on recent large scale Chinese initiatives and some member states pursue individual economic interests, which do not correspond to those of the EU as a whole; 16+1 format as “controversial”, as its arrangements are “in conflict with the EU law” which leads to the “erosion of EU norms”; the necessity to “cooperate with the Commission, the EEAS and other Member States to help ensure that relevant aspects to the EU are in line with EU law, rules and policies, and that the overall outcome is beneficial for the EU as a whole”. We analyze the concerns and make specific proposals so that the 16+1 format might cease to be an issue in China-EU relations.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: China, Central and Eastern Europe CEE, 16+1, European Commission, European Parliament, European External Action Service EEAS, China-Europe Land-Sea Express Passage.
• Subjects: F - International Economics > F0 - General > F00 - General; F - International Economics > F0 - General > F01 - Global Outlook; F - International Economics > F0 - General > F02 - International Economic Order and Integration; F - International Economics > F5 - International Relations, National Security, and International Political Economy > F50 - General; F - International Economics > F5 - International Relations, National Security, and International Political Economy > F53 - International Agreements and Observance ; International Organizations; F - International Economics > F6 - Economic Impacts of Globalization > F60 - General

References

1. Chen, X. (coordinator) (2017). How Hungary Perceives the Belt and Road Initiative and China-CEEC Cooperation, China Social Sciences Press, National Think Tank (1), Beijing.

2. Economy, E.C. (2018), The Third Revolution – Xi Jinping and the New Chinese State, Oxford University Press.

3. European Commission (2017), On Significant Distortions in the Economy of the People’s Republic of China for the purpose of trade defence investigations, Brussels, December 20, SWD (2017) 483 final/2.

4. The European Union Chamber of Commerce in China (2017), European Business in China – Position Paper 2017/2018.

5. García-Herrero, A., Kwok, K.C., Liu, X., Summers, T., Zhang, Y. (2017), EU-China Economic Relations to 2025 – Building a Common Future, A common report by Bruegel, Chatham House, China Center for International Economic Exchanges and the Chinese University of Hong Kong, September.

6. Godement, F., Vasselier, A. (2017), China at the gates: A new power audit of EU-China relations, European Council on Foreign Relations, December 1.

7. Godement, F. (2017), The EU-China Summit: searching for common ground, European Council on Foreign Relations June 1.

8. Góralczyk, B. (2017). China’s interests in Central and Eastern Europe: enter the dragon, European View.

9. Grieger, G. (2017), China, the 16+1 cooperation format and the EU, European Parliament Research Service.

10. Hackaj, A. (2018), “China in Europe: A View from the Balkans”, in: Huang Ping, Liu Zuokui (editors-in-chief), How the 16+1 Cooperation promotes the Belt and Road Initiative, China-CEEC Think Tanks Book Series, pp. 102-123.

11. Jakóbowski, J. (2018), Chinese-led Regional Multilateralism in Central and Eastern Europe, Africa and Latin America: 16 + 1, FOCAC, and CCF, Journal of Contemporary China.

12. Liu, Z., Ju, W., Ma, J. (2018), The Development and Evaluation Report of China-CEEC Think Tanks Exchange and Cooperation 2015-2016, Editor-in-chief Huang Ping, China-CEEC Think Tanks Book Series.

13. Long, J., Dai, Y. (2018), The EU’s Policy towards China in 2017, in: China Policies of the EU and Its Members 2017 – Two patterns of differentiated cooperation, Center for China-EU Relations, Fudan University, Shanghai Institute for European Studies, January, pp. 2-10.

14. Long, J. (2016), “The Transition of EU’s Attitude towards 16+1”, in: Andžāns, M. (editor), Afterthoughts: Riga 2016 International Forum of China and Central and Eastern European Countries, pp. 25-28.

15. Mierzejewski, D. (2017), Poland external relations briefing: Poland and Budapest 16+1 Summit, November.

16. Nölke, A., Vliegenthart, A. (2009), Enlarging the Varieties of Capitalism – The Emergence of Dependent Market Economies in East Central Europe, World Politics 61, No. 4, October, 670-702.

17. Oehler-Şincai, I. M. (2018), The 16+1 Process: Correlations between the EU Dependence/Attitude Matrix and the Cooperation Intensity with China, forthcoming.

18. Oehler-Şincai, I.M., Lianu, C., Ilie, C., Rădulescu, I. (2017), Romanian Attitudes and Perceptions towards the 16+1 Cooperation Platform, China-CEE Institute, No. 6, November 15.

19. Scimia, E. (2017), ‘Multilateralism first’ at center of China-EU relations, Asia Times, April 22.

20. Shi, Z., Trigas, V. (2013), China and Europe: Partners or Competitors?, Carnegie Europe.

21. Song, L. (2018), The Policy of CEECs towards China in 2017 – Supporting the “Belt and Road” Initiative, in: China Policies of the EU and Its Members 2017 – Two patterns of differentiated cooperation, Center for China-EU Relations, Fudan University, Shanghai Institute for European Studies, January, pp. 33-38.

22. State Council of the People’s Republic of China (2011), China’s Peaceful Development, Information Office, September, Beijing.

23. Sverdrup-Thygeson, B., Yennie Lindgren, W., Lanteigne, M. (editors) (2017), China and Nordic Diplomacy, Routledge, London.

24. Teokarević, J. (2016). Serbia: Perspectives on Eurasian Integration, European Council on Foreign Relations, June 8.

25. Turcsányi, R. Q. (2017a), Growing Tensions between China and the EU Over 16+1 Platform, The Diplomat, November 29.

26. Turcsányi, R. Q. (2017b), Slovakia’s Overdue China Strategy, The Diplomat, November 03.

27. Turcsányi, R. Q. (2014), Central and Eastern Europe’s Courtship with China: Trojan Horse within the EU?, European Institute for Asian Studies, EU-Asia at a Glance, January.

28. Wu, G., Lansdowne, H. (editors) (2008), China Turns to Multilateralism – Foreign Policy and Regional Security, Routledge, London and New York.

29. Zalan, E. (2017), Hungary-Serbia Railway Launched at China Summit, November 29, EUObserver.