Capital, technical progress and international trade

Rahim, Sikander (2018): Capital, technical progress and international trade.

Abstract

(Abstract) CAPITAL, TECHNICAL PROGRESS AND INTERNATIONAL TRADE Much has been written about the objection originally formulated by Piero Sraffa to the use of production functions and aggregate capital and of the disputes that ensued, but there seems to be no systematic explanation in one place of why this objection is crucial to the foundations of economic theory and why the various attempts to escape it fail. This paper is an attempt provide one. First, it presents the reasoning of the objection and shows how the arguments against it are either fallacious or too restricted to be useful. Second, it shows how technical progress and international trade give two more reasons for the same objection, which, though logically independent, only became apparent because of the first. From these it follows that neither technical progress nor international trade can be plausibly described or explained if capital goods are not treated as heterogeneous goods manufactured with the use of capital goods. This leads to a more realistic depiction of technical progress as the outcome of the R&D of competing firms. (For brevity, government activities are left out.) The implications for international trade are described briefly. This paper is not a survey; it is confined to the minimum needed to establish its contentions. Its discussion of the disputes has mostly been said before, but it covers some gaps that seem to have been overlooked. It adds to the discussion in that the disputes did not take up the implications of technical progress and international trade.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: Capital theory, technical progress, R&D, international trade
• Subjects: B - History of Economic Thought, Methodology, and Heterodox Approaches > B5 - Current Heterodox Approaches > B51 - Socialist ; Marxian ; Sraffian; F - International Economics > F1 - Trade > F10 - General; F - International Economics > F1 - Trade > F11 - Neoclassical Models of Trade; O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O3 - Innovation ; Research and Development ; Technological Change ; Intellectual Property Rights > O31 - Innovation and Invention: Processes and Incentives; O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O3 - Innovation ; Research and Development ; Technological Change ; Intellectual Property Rights > O32 - Management of Technological Innovation and R&D; O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O3 - Innovation ; Research and Development ; Technological Change ; Intellectual Property Rights > O34 - Intellectual Property and Intellectual Capital

References

Abramovitz, Moses. “Economic Growth in the United States.” The American Economic Review 52, no. 4 (1962): 762–82.

Aghion, Philippe, and Peter Howitt. “A Model of Growth Through Creative Destruction.” Econometrica 60, no. 2 (1992): 323–51. https://doi.org/10.2307/2951599.

Arrow, Kenneth Joseph., and Frank Horace. Hahn. General competitive analysis. Amsterdam: North-Holland, 1983.

Brown, E. H. Phelps. “The Meaning of the Fitted Cobb-Douglas Function.” The Quarterly Journal of Economics 71, no. 4 (1957): 546–60. https://doi.org/10.2307/1885710.

Burmeister, Edwin. “Wicksell Effects.” In Capital Theory, by John. Eatwell, Murray. Milgate, and Peter. Newman, 257–61. The New Palgrave, n.d.

Chamberlin, Edward. The Theory of Monopolistic Competition. Cambridge: Harvard Univ. Pr., 1933.

Champernowne, D. G. “The Production Function and the Theory of Capital: A Comment.” The Review of Economic Studies 21, no. 2 (1953): 112–35. https://doi.org/10.2307/2296004.39

Cohen, Avi J., and G. C. Harcourt. “Retrospectives: Whatever Happened to the Cambridge Capital Theory Controversies?” The Journal of Economic Perspectives 17, no. 1 (2003): 199–214.

Denison, Edward Fulton. “Some Major Issues in Productivity Analysis: An Examination of Estimates by Jorgenson and Griliches.” Survey of Current Business 52, no. 5. Part II (May 1972): 37–63.

Ethier, Wilfred. “The Theorems of International Trade in Time-Phased Economies.” Journal of International Economics 9, no. 2 (May 1, 1979): 225–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1996(79)90005-9.

Felipe, Jesus, and Franklin M. Fisher. “Aggregation in Production Functions: What Applied Economists Should Know.” Metroeconomica 54, no. 2&3 (2003): 208–62.

Garegnani, P. “Heterogeneous Capital, the Production Function and the Theory of Distribution.” The Review of Economic Studies 37, no. 3 (1970): 407–36. https://doi.org/10.2307/2296729.

Arrow, Kenneth Joseph., and Frank Horace. Hahn. 1983. General competitive analysis. Amsterdam: North-Holland.

Hahn, Frank. 1982. “The Neo-Ricardians.” Cambridge Journal of Economics 6 (4): 353–74.

Helpman, Elhanan., and Paul R. Krugman. Market Structure and Foreign Trade: Increasing Returns, Imperfect Competitition and the International Economy. Cambridge (Massachusetts) [etc.]: MIT, 1993.

Howitt, Peter. “Steady Endogenous Growth with Population and R. & D. Inputs Growing.” Journal of Political Economy 107, no. 4 (1999): 715–30. https://doi.org/10.1086/250076.

Jones, Charles I. “R & D-Based Models of Economic Growth.” Journal of Political Economy 103, no. 4 (1995): 759–84.

Jorgenson, D. W., and Z. Griliches. “The Explanation of Productivity Change.” The Review of Economic Studies 34, no. 3 (1967): 249–83. https://doi.org/10.2307/2296675.

Jorgenson, Dale W., and Zvi Griliches. “Issues in Growth Accounting: A Reply to Edward F. Denison.” Survey of Current Business 52, no. 5. Part II (May 1972): 65–94.

Lancaster, Kelvin J. “A New Approach to Consumer Theory.” Journal of Political Economy Journal of Political Economy 74, no. 2 (1966): 132–57.

Levhari, David. “A Nonsubstitution Theorem and Switching of Techniques.” The Quarterly Journal of Economics 79, no. 1 (1965): 98–105. https://doi.org/10.2307/1880514.

Mazzucato, Mariana. The Entrepreneurial State : Debunking Public vs. Private Sector Myths, 2015.

Pasinetti, Luigi L. “On Concepts and Measures of Changes in Productivity.” The Review of Economics and Statistics 41, no. 3 (1959): 270–86. https://doi.org/10.2307/1927453.

———. “Switches of Technique and the ‘Rate of Return’ in Capital Theory.” The Economic Journal 79, no. 315 (1969): 508–31. https://doi.org/10.2307/2230379.

Read, L. M. “The Measure of Total Factor Productivity Appropriate to Wage-Price Guidelines.” The Canadian Journal of Economics / Revue Canadienne d’Economique 1, no. 2 (1968): 349–58. https://doi.org/10.2307/133503.

Robinson, Joan. The Economics of Imperfect Competition. London: Macmillan, 1933.

———. “The Production Function and the Theory of Capital.” The Review of Economic Studies 21, no. 2 (1953): 81–106. https://doi.org/10.2307/2296002.

———. “The Production Function and the Theory of Capital--A Reply.” The Review of Economic Studies 23, no. 3 (1955): 247–247. https://doi.org/10.2307/2295732.

Rodrik, Dani. What Does the Political Economy Literature on Trade Policy (Not) Tell Us That We Ought to Know? Cambridge, Mass.: National Bureau of Economic Research, 1994.40

Romer, Paul. “New Goods, Old Theory, and the Welfare Costs of Trade Restrictions.” Journal of Development Economics 43, no. 1 (February 1, 1994): 5–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-3878(94)90021-3.

Romer, Paul M. “Endogenous Technological Change.” Journal of Political Economy 98, no.5 (1990): S71–102.

Rymes, Thomas K. On Concepts of Capital and Technical Change. Cambridge: University Press, 1980.

Samuelson, Paul A. “Parable and Realism in Capital Theory: The Surrogate Production Function.” The Review of Economic Studies 29, no. 3 (1962): 193–206. https://doi.org/10.2307/2295954.

Schwartz, Jacob T. Lectures on the Mathematical Method in Analytical Economics. New York: Gordon and Breach, 1961.

Segerstrom, Paul S., and James M. Zolnierek. “The R&D Incentives of Industry Leaders.”International Economic Review 40, no. 3 (1999): 745–66.

Solow, Robert M. Capital Theory and the Rate of Return. Professor F. de Vries Lectures. Amsterdam: North-Holland Publishing Company, 1963.

———. “Substitution and Fixed Proportions in the Theory of Capital.” The Review of Economic Studies 29, no. 3 (June 1962): 207–18.

———. “Technical Change and the Aggregate Production Function.” The Review of Economics and Statistics 39, no. 3 (1957): 312–20. https://doi.org/10.2307/1926047.

———. “Technical Progress, Capital Formation, and Economic Growth.” The American Economic Review 52, no. 2 (1962): 76–86.

———. “The Production Function and the Theory of Capital.” The Review of Economic Studies 23, no. 2 (1955): 101–8. https://doi.org/10.2307/2296293.

Sraffa, Piero. “Production of Commodities by Means of Commodities: Prelude to a Critique of Economic Theory,” 1959.

Sraffa, Piero. “The Laws of Returns under Competitive Conditions.” The Economic Journal 36, no. 144 (1926): 535–50. https://doi.org/10.2307/2959866.

Stokey, Nancy L. “Learning by Doing and the Introduction of New Goods.” Journal of Political Economy 96, no. 4 (1988): 701–17.

Vanek, Jaroslav. “The Factor Proportions Theory: The N-Factor Case.” Kyklos 21 (1968):749–54.

Young, Alwyn. “Growth Without Scale Effects.” Journal of Political Economy 106, no. 1 (1998): 41–63. https://doi.org/10.1086/250002.