Ong, David (2008): Fishy Gifts: Bribing with Shame and Guilt.
This is the latest version of this item.
Download (854kB) | Preview
Gifts are often used where the institutions of contracting do not exist, or are underdeveloped, as in emerging markets, or otherwise unenforceable, as with illicit transactions in developed markets. The following is an analysis of gifts in the context of belief preferences with unobservable reciprocation. I show that if recipients are heterogeneously shame and guilt averse, the beliefs implied by a gift can induce a self-fulfilling reputation through their interaction. In particular, I show how a bribing firm, by varying the saliency of the bribe through cheap talk announcements or by varying the value of the gift, can induce free-riders (non-reciprocators) to reject and thus, reduce costs. In cases when the shame of accepting a possible bribe is too great, I show lowering the cost can invite free-riders to accept, and thus, reduce the shame of those who would reciprocate into accepting. The model was inspired by the gift giving practices of pharmaceutical firms to US doctors. I explain a perverse consequence of current policies to prevent reciprocation, and why the most obvious solution, a ban on gifts, has been adopted only by a handful of hospitals. I discuss implications for professional services where reciprocation is a credence good. To my knowledge, this is the first study of how the shame of accepting a gift may interact with the guilt of not reciprocating to select for reciprocation.
|Item Type:||MPRA Paper|
|Original Title:||Fishy Gifts: Bribing with Shame and Guilt|
|Keywords:||gifts, bribery, guilt, shame, gifts, drug firms, doctors, social norms, indirect speech, psychological trust game, contracting|
|Subjects:||I - Health, Education, and Welfare > I1 - Health > I11 - Analysis of Health Care Markets
D - Microeconomics > D8 - Information, Knowledge, and Uncertainty > D86 - Economics of Contract: Theory
M - Business Administration and Business Economics ; Marketing ; Accounting ; Personnel Economics > M3 - Marketing and Advertising > M31 - Marketing
H - Public Economics > H5 - National Government Expenditures and Related Policies > H51 - Government Expenditures and Health
H - Public Economics > H7 - State and Local Government ; Intergovernmental Relations > H75 - State and Local Government: Health ; Education ; Welfare ; Public Pensions
I - Health, Education, and Welfare > I1 - Health > I18 - Government Policy ; Regulation ; Public Health
M - Business Administration and Business Economics ; Marketing ; Accounting ; Personnel Economics > M3 - Marketing and Advertising > M37 - Advertising
D - Microeconomics > D8 - Information, Knowledge, and Uncertainty > D82 - Asymmetric and Private Information ; Mechanism Design
C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C7 - Game Theory and Bargaining Theory > C72 - Noncooperative Games
|Depositing User:||David Ong|
|Date Deposited:||05 Dec 2011 16:30|
|Last Modified:||20 Jun 2016 01:30|
Adair, R. & Holmgren, L. (2005), 'Do drug samples influence resident prescribing behavior? A randomized trial', The American Journal of Medicine 118(8), 881--884.
Battigalli, P. & Dufwenberg, M. (2009), 'Dynamic psychological games', Journal of Economic Theory 144(1), 1--35.
Battigalli, P. & Dufwenberg, M. (2007), 'Guilt in games', The American economic review 97(2), 170--176.
Brennan, T.; Rothman, D.; Blank, L.; Blumenthal, D.; Chimonas, S.; Cohen, J.; Goldman, J.; Kassirer, J.; Kimball, H.; Naughton, J. & others (2006), 'Health industry practices that create conflicts of interest', JAMA: the journal of the American Medical Association 295(4), 429.
Charness, G. & Dufwenberg, M. (2006), 'Promises and partnership', Econometrica 74(6), 1579--1601.
Chew, L.; O'Young, T.; Hazlet, T.; Bradley, K.; Maynard, C. & Lessler, D. (2000), 'A physician survey of the effect of drug sample availability on physicians' behavior', Journal of general internal medicine 15(7), 478--483.
Cho, I. & Kreps, D. (1987), 'Signaling games and stable equilibria', The Quarterly Journal of Economics 102(2), 179.
Dana, J. & Loewenstein, G. (2003), 'A social science perspective on gifts to physicians from industry', JAMA: the journal of the American Medical Association 290(2), 252.
Fong, Y.; Huang, C. & Offerman, T. (2007), 'Guilt driven reciprocity in a psychological signaling game', .
Foundation, K. F. (2007), 'Prescription drug trends', Kaiser Family Foundation Washington eDC DC.
Fugh-Berman, A. & Ahari, S. (2007), 'Following the script: how drug reps make friends and influence doctors', PLoS Medicine 4(4), e150.
Greene, J. (2007), 'Pharmaceutical marketing research and the prescribing physician', Annals of internal medicine 146(10), 742.
Gul, F. & Pesendorfer, W. (2010), 'Interdependent Preference Models as a Theory of Intentions', Technical report, Working paper.
Madhavan, S.; Amonkar, M.; Elliott, D.; Burke, K. & Gore, P. (1997), 'The gift relationship between pharmaceutical companies and physicians: an exploratory survey of physicians', Journal of clinical pharmacy and therapeutics 22(3), 207--218.
Malmendier, U. & Schmidt, K. (2010), 'You Owe Me', Unpublished Manuscript.
Morgan, M.; Dana, J.; Loewenstein, G.; Zinberg, S. & Schulkin, J. (2006), 'Interactions of doctors with the pharmaceutical industry', Journal of medical ethics 32(10), 559.
Norris, P.; Herxheimer, A.; Lexchin, J. & Mansfield, P. (2005), 'Drug Promotion: What We Know, What We Have Yet to Learn: Reviews of Materials in the WHO/HAI Database on Drug Promotion', WHO, Geneva.
Ong, D. (2011), 'Fishy Gifts: Bribing with Shame and Guilt', Mimeo.
Ong, D. (2011), 'Pro Bono Work and Honor in Expert Fields', Mimeo.
Orlowski, J. & Wateska, L. (1992), 'The effects of pharmaceutical firm enticements on physician prescribing patterns. There's no such thing as a free lunch.', Chest 102(1), 270.
Rabin, M. (1993), 'Incorporating fairness into game theory and economics', The American Economic Review, 1281--1302.
Randall, M.; Rosenbaum, J.; Rohrbaugh, R. & Rosenheck, R. (2005), 'Attitudes and behaviors of psychiatry residents toward pharmaceutical representatives before and after an educational intervention', Academic Psychiatry 29(1), 33.
Reuben, E.; Sapienza, P. & Zingales, L. (2009), 'Is mistrust self-fulfilling?', Economics Letters 104(2), 89--91.
Ross, J.; Lackner, J.; Lurie, P.; Gross, C.; Wolfe, S. & Krumholz, H. (2007), 'Pharmaceutical company payments to physicians', JAMA: the journal of the American Medical Association 297(11), 1216.
Steinbrook, R. (2009), 'Physician–Industry Relations—Will Fewer Gifts Make a Difference?', New England Journal of Medicine 360(6), 557--559.
Steinbrook, R. (2006), 'For sale: physicians' prescribing data', New England Journal of Medicine 354(26), 2745--2747.
Steinman, M.; Shlipak, M. & McPhee, S. (2001), 'Of principles and pens: attitudes and practices of medicine housestaff toward pharmaceutical industry promotions* 1', The American journal of medicine 110(7), 551--557.
Tadelis, S. (2007), The power of shame and the rationality of trust, in 'Available at SSRN: http://ssrn. com/abstract'.
Tangney, J. & Dearing, R. (2003), Shame and guilt, The Guilford Press.
Watch, C. (2001), 'Rx R&D Myths: The Case Against The Drug Industry’s R&D “Scare Card”', julio de.
Wazana, A. (2002), 'National survey of physicians: part II, doctors and prescription drugs', Kaiser Family Foundation, Washington, DC.
Wazana, A. (2000), 'Physicians and the pharmaceutical industry', JAMA: the journal of the American Medical Association 283(3), 373.
Available Versions of this Item
Fishy Gifts: Bribing with Shame and Guilt. (deposited 31 Aug 2009 14:39)
Fishy Gifts: Bribing with Shame and Guilt. (deposited 02 Sep 2009 06:47)
Fishy Gifts: Bribing with Shame and Guilt. (deposited 30 Dec 2009 10:18)
- Fishy Gifts: Bribing with Shame and Guilt. (deposited 05 Dec 2011 16:30) [Currently Displayed]
- Fishy Gifts: Bribing with Shame and Guilt. (deposited 30 Dec 2009 10:18)
- Fishy Gifts: Bribing with Shame and Guilt. (deposited 02 Sep 2009 06:47)