Chaudhuri, Sarbajit and Biswas, Anindya (2015): Public Subsidy on Education and Welfare in Small OECD Countries: A Theoretical and Empirical Reconciliation.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_61593.pdf Download (85kB) | Preview |
Abstract
As per the conventional wisdom there should be provision for public assistance for skill acquirement for achieving higher economic growth in the future. However, empirical observations on small OECD countries over the period 2001-2011 tell somewhat a different story. This study makes an attempt in explaining those atypical findings, first theoretically by means of a simple dynamic two-sector, specific factor general equilibrium framework with endogenous skill formation and provision for public subsidy on education and then empirically with the help of conventional unbalanced panel data models. The analysis questions the desirability of the public subsidy policy on education in improving intertemporal social welfare in a small open developed economy.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Public Subsidy on Education and Welfare in Small OECD Countries: A Theoretical and Empirical Reconciliation |
English Title: | Public Subsidy on Education and Welfare in Small OECD Countries: A Theoretical and Empirical Reconciliation |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | Skill formation, Education Subsidy, Intertemporal Social Welfare, General Equilibrium, Unbalanced Panel Data |
Subjects: | D - Microeconomics > D5 - General Equilibrium and Disequilibrium > D58 - Computable and Other Applied General Equilibrium Models I - Health, Education, and Welfare > I2 - Education and Research Institutions > I24 - Education and Inequality I - Health, Education, and Welfare > I2 - Education and Research Institutions > I28 - Government Policy J - Labor and Demographic Economics > J3 - Wages, Compensation, and Labor Costs > J31 - Wage Level and Structure ; Wage Differentials |
Item ID: | 61593 |
Depositing User: | Sarbajit Chaudhuri |
Date Deposited: | 27 Jan 2015 08:27 |
Last Modified: | 28 Sep 2019 10:13 |
References: | Autor, D. H. (2014): ‘Skills, education, and the rise of earnings inequality among the “other 99 percent”’, Science 344(6186), 843-851. Becker, G. S. (1964): Human Capital. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Beyer, H., Rojas, P. and Vergara, R. (1999): ‘Trade liberalization and wage inequality’, Journal of Development Economics, 59(1): 103-123. Brown, P., Green, A., and Lauder, H. (2001): High Skills: Globalization, Competitiveness, and Skill Formation. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Chaudhuri, S. and Mukhopadhyay, U. (2014): FDI in Developing Countries: A Theoretical Evaluation, Springer, IN. Chaudhuri, S. and Mukhopadhyay, U. (2009): Revisiting the Informal Sector: A General Equilibrium Approach, Springer, New York, USA . Crouch, C., Finegold, D., and Sako, M. (1999): Are Skills the Answer: The Political Economy of Skill Creation in Advanced Industrial Countries. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Currie, J. and Harrison, A. (1997): ‘Trade reform and labor market adjustment in Morocco’, Journal of Labour Economics. Feenstra, R.C. and Hanson, G.H. (1997): ‘Foreign direct investment and relative wages: evidence from Mexico's maquiladoras’, Journal of International Economics, 42: 371-394. Harrison, A. and Hanson, G. (1999): ‘Who gains from trade reform? Some remaining puzzles’, Journal of Development Economics, 59(1): 125-154. Heckman, J. and Krueger, A. (2003): Inequality in America: What role for human capital policies? MIT Press, Cambridge, MA. Robbins, D. (1995): ‘Trade, trade liberalization and inequality in Latin America and East Asia: Synthesis of seven country studies’, HIID. Vanhuysse, P. (2007): The new political economy of skill formation, Public Administration Review 67. Wood, A. (1997): ‘Openness and wage inequality in developing countries: the Latin American challenge to East Asian conventional wisdom”, World Bank Research Observer, January. World Bank, (2014). World Development Indicators. Washington, DC. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/61593 |