Skill Biased Technical Change: Wage Effects from a Panel of Occupational Task Measures

Ross, Matthew (2014): Skill Biased Technical Change: Wage Effects from a Panel of Occupational Task Measures.

Abstract

At the heart of the Skill Biased Technical Change literature is a discussion of the temporal impact of technological change on wages. The narrative describes technological change as allowing for the increased codification of routine tasks which enables capital to become more easily substituted for occupations with a high degree of engagement in these tasks. Existing empirical analyses have focused on the impact of SBTC by examining repeated cross-sections of individuals using constant measures of occupational task requirements. That approach is unable to explore how wages respond to the time variant components of occupational task requirements. This analysis expands the existing literature by examining wage effects using a panel of occupational task requirements constructed from 19 releases of the O*Net database. The panel of occupational task requirements is combined with a micropanel of workers and used to estimate the returns to differential task requirements both within and across occupations. These estimates confirm previous empirical findings that have relied on repeated cross sections but show that controlling for individual fixed effects reduces the magnitude of estimates across occupations. In addition, the analysis develops a structurally derived fixed effects model that helps to provide evidence that the same wage effects are absent for changes to tasks within occupations. The within occupation estimates do, however, illustrate how cross-occupational dynamics and employment transitions might be playing a role in the observed cross-sectional estimates.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: Skill Biased Technical Change, O*Net, Task Measures, Wages, Employment Dynamics
• Subjects: J - Labor and Demographic Economics > J2 - Demand and Supply of Labor > J20 - General; J - Labor and Demographic Economics > J2 - Demand and Supply of Labor > J23 - Labor Demand; J - Labor and Demographic Economics > J2 - Demand and Supply of Labor > J24 - Human Capital ; Skills ; Occupational Choice ; Labor Productivity; J - Labor and Demographic Economics > J3 - Wages, Compensation, and Labor Costs; J - Labor and Demographic Economics > J3 - Wages, Compensation, and Labor Costs > J30 - General; J - Labor and Demographic Economics > J3 - Wages, Compensation, and Labor Costs > J31 - Wage Level and Structure ; Wage Differentials; O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O3 - Innovation ; Research and Development ; Technological Change ; Intellectual Property Rights > O30 - General; O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O3 - Innovation ; Research and Development ; Technological Change ; Intellectual Property Rights > O31 - Innovation and Invention: Processes and Incentives; O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O3 - Innovation ; Research and Development ; Technological Change ; Intellectual Property Rights > O33 - Technological Change: Choices and Consequences ; Diffusion Processes

References

Abraham, K.G. and R. Shimer. “Changes in Unemployment Duration and Labor Force Attachment.” Pp. 367–420 in The Roaring Nineties: Can Full Employment be Sustained?, edited by A.B. Krueger and R. Solow. New York: Russell Sage Foundation. 2001.

Acemoglu, Daron and David Autor. "Skills, Tasks and Technologies: Implications for Employment and Earnings," Handbook of Labor Economics Volume 4. 2011.

Autor, David and Lawrence Katz and Alan Krueger. “Computing Inequality: Have Computers Changed the Labor Market”. The Quarterly Journal of Economics. November, 1998.

Autor, David and Frank levy and Richard Murnane. “The Skill Content of Recent Technological Change: An Empirical Exploration”. Quarterly Journal of Economics. November, 2003.

Autor, David and Lawrence Katz and Melissa Kearney. “Trends in U.S. Wage Inequality: Revising the Revisionists”. The Review of Economics and Statistics. May, 2008.

Autor, David. "The "Task Approach" to Labor Markets: An Overview," NBER Working Papers 18711, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc. 2013a.

Autor, David and Michael Handel. “Putting Tasks to the Test: Human Capital, Job Tasks, and Wages”. Journal of Labor Economics. April, 2013b.

Autor, David. “Polanyi’s Paradox and the Shape of Employment Growth”. Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City’s Economic Policy Discussion Paper. 2014.

Blanchard, O.J. and P. Diamond. “The Cyclical Behavior of the Gross Flows of U.S. Workers.” Brookings Papers on Economic Activity 2:85–143, 154–55. 1990.

Blinder, Alan. “How Many U.S. Jobs Might be Offshorable?”. CEPS Working Paper, No. 142. 2007.

Bradbury, K. “Riding Tides in the Labor Market: To What Degree Do Expansions Benefit the Disadvantaged?” New England Economic Review May/June:3–33. 2000.

Carneiro, Pedro and Sokbae Lee "Trends in Quality-Adjusted Skill Premia in the United States, 1960-2000," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 101(6), pages 2309-49. October, 2010.

Davis, S.J. and J. Haltiwanger. “Gross Job Creation, Gross Job Destruction, and Employment Reallocation.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 107:819–63. 1992.

Davis, S.J. and J. Haltiwanger. “On the Driving Forces behind Cyclical Movements in Employment and Job Reallocation.” American Economic Review 89:1234–58. 1999.

Davis, Steven J., R. Jason Faberman, and John Haltiwanger. “The Flow Approach to Labor Markets: New Evidence and Micro-Macro Links.” Journal of Economic Perspectives, 20(3): 3-26. 2006.

Fallick, Bruce and Charles A. Fleischman.“Employer-to-Employer Flows in the U.S. Labor Market: The Complete Picture of Gross Worker Flows,” Finance and Economics Discussion Series #2004-34, Federal Reserve Board, Washington, DC. 2004.

Firpo, Sergio and Nicole M. Fortin and Thomas Lemieux. “Occupational Tasks and Changes in the Wage Structure”. IZA Discussion Paper, No. 5542. 2011.

Gathmann, Christina and Uta Scho ̈nberg. “How General is Human Capital? A Task-Based Approach”. Journal of Labor Economics. 2010.

Jensen, Bradford and Lori G. Kletzer. “Measuring Tradable Services and the Task Content of Offshorable Service Jobs”. National Bureau of Economic Research: Labor in the New Economy. 2010.

Kambourov, Gueorgui and Iourii Manovskii. “Rising Occupational and Industry Mobility in the United States: 1968-97”. International Economic Review. February, 2008.

Katz, Lawrence and Kevin Murphy. “Changes in Relative Wages, 1963-1987: Supply and Demand Factors”. The Quarterly Journal of Economics. February, 1992.

Michaelides, Marios and Peter Muesder. “The Role of Industry and Occupation in U.S. Unemployment Differentials by Gender, Race, and Ethnicity: Recent Trends”. IMPAQ International Working Paper. September 2010.

Moscarini, Giuseppe and Kaj Thomsson. “Occupational and Job Mobility in the US”. Scandinavian Journal of Economics. 2007.

Yamaguchi, Shintaro. "Tasks and Heterogeneous Human Capital," Journal of Labor Economics. 2012.