Possebom, Vitor (2018): Sharp bounds on the MTE with sample selection.
This is the latest version of this item.
PDF
MPRA_paper_91828.pdf Download (2MB) |
Abstract
I propose a Generalized Roy Model with sample selection that can be used to analyze treatment effects in a variety of empirical problems. First, I decompose, under a monotonicity assumption on the sample selection indicator, the MTR function for the observable outcome when treated as a weighted average of (i) the MTR on the outcome of interest for the always-observed sub-population and (ii) the MTE on the observable outcome for the observed-only-when-treated sub-population, and show that such decomposition can provide point-wise sharp bounds on the MTE of interest for the always-observed sub-population. Moreover, I impose an extra mean dominance assumption and tighten the previous bounds. I, then, show how to point-identify those bounds when the support of the propensity score is continuous. After that, I show how to (partially) identify the MTE of interest when the support of the propensity score is discrete. At the end, I estimate bounds on the MTE of the Job Corps Training Program on hourly wages for the always-employed sub-population and find that it is decreasing with the likelihood of attending the program for the Non-Hispanic group. For example, I find that the ATT is between $.38 and $1.17 while the ATU is between $.73 and $3.14.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Sharp bounds on the MTE with sample selection |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | Marginal Treatment Effect; Sample Selection; Selection into Treatment; Partial Identification; Principal Stratification; Program Evaluation; Training Programs |
Subjects: | C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C3 - Multiple or Simultaneous Equation Models ; Multiple Variables > C31 - Cross-Sectional Models ; Spatial Models ; Treatment Effect Models ; Quantile Regressions ; Social Interaction Models C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C3 - Multiple or Simultaneous Equation Models ; Multiple Variables > C35 - Discrete Regression and Qualitative Choice Models ; Discrete Regressors ; Proportions C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C3 - Multiple or Simultaneous Equation Models ; Multiple Variables > C36 - Instrumental Variables (IV) Estimation J - Labor and Demographic Economics > J3 - Wages, Compensation, and Labor Costs > J38 - Public Policy |
Item ID: | 91828 |
Depositing User: | Vitor Possebom |
Date Deposited: | 30 Jan 2019 15:05 |
Last Modified: | 27 Sep 2019 02:23 |
References: | Ahn, H. & Powell, J. L. (1993), ‘Semiparametric Estimation of Censored Selection Models with a Nonparametric Selection Mechanism’, Journal of Econometrics 58 Altonji, J. (1993), ‘The Demand for and Return to Education When Education Outcomes are Uncertain’, Journal of Labor Economics 11(1) Angelucci, M., Karlan, D. & Zinman, J. (2015), ‘Microcredit Impacts: Evidence from a Randomized Microcredit Program Placement Experiment by Comportamos Banco’, American Economic Journal: Applied Economics 7(1) Angrist, J., Bettinger, E. & Kremer, M. (2006), ‘Long-Term Educational Consequences of Secondary School Vouchers: Evidence from Administrative Records in Colombia’, The American Economic Review 96(3) Angrist, J., Lang, D. & Oreopoulos, P. (2009), ‘Incentives and Services for College Achievement: Evidence from a Randomized Trial’, American Economic Journal: Applied Economics 1(1) Behaghel, L., Crepon, B., Gurgand, M. & Barbanchon, T. L. (2015), ‘Please Call Again: Correcting Nonresponse Bias in Treatment Effect Models’, The Review of Economics and Statistics 97(5) Bhattacharya, J., Shaikh, A. M. & Vytlacil, E. (2008), ‘Treatment Effect Bounds under Monotonicity Assumptions: An Application to Swan-Ganz Catheterization’, The American Economic Review: Papers and Proceedings 98(2) Bhattacharya, J., Shaikh, A. M. & Vytlacil, E. (2012), ‘Treatment Effect Bounds: An Application to Swan-Ganz Catheterization’, Journal of Econometrics 168(2) Blanco, G., Chen, X., Flores, C. A. & Flores-Lagunes, A. (2017), Bounding Average and Quantile Effects of Training on Employment and Unemployment Durations under Selection, Censoring, and Noncompliance. Available at: http://conference.iza.org/conference_ files/EVAL_2017/blanco_g7367.pdf. Blanco, G., Flores, C. A. & Flores-Lagunes, A. (2013), ‘Bounds on Average and Quantile Treatment Effects of Job Corps Training on Wages’, Journal of Human Resources 48(3) Blundell, R., Gosling, A., Ichimura, H. & Meghir, C. (2007), ‘Changes in the Distribution of Male and Female Wages Accounting for Employment Composition Using Bounds’, Econometrica 75(2) Brinch, C. N., Mogstad, M. & Wiswall, M. (2017), ‘Beyond LATE with a Discrete Instrument’, Journal of Political Economy 125(4) Card, D. (1999), The Causal Effect of Education on Earnings, in O. Ashenfelter & D. Card, eds, ‘Handbook of Labor Economics’, Vol. 3A, Elsevier, pp. pp. 1801{1863. Carneiro, P., Heckman, J. J. & Vytlacil, E. (2011), ‘Estimating Marginal Returns to Education’, The American Economic Review 101(6) CASS (1984), ‘Myocardial Infarction and Mortality in the Coronary Artery Surgery Study (CASS) Randomized Trial’, The New England Journal of Medicine 310(12) Chen, X. & Flores, C. A. (2015), ‘Bounds on Treatment Effects in the Presence of Sample Selection and Noncompliance: The Wage Effects of Job Corps’, Journal of Business and Economic Statistics 33(4) Chen, X., Flores, C. A. & Flores-Lagunes, A. (2017), ‘Going beyond LATE: Bounding Average Treatment Effects of Job Corps Training’, Journal of Human Resources . Chen, X., Hong, H. & Tarozzi, A. (2008), ‘Semiparametric Efficiency in GMM Models with Auxiliary Data’, The Annals of Statistics 36(2) Chesher, A. (2010), ‘Instrumental Variable Models for Discrete Outcomes’, Econometrica 78(2) Chetty, R., Friedman, J. N., Hilger, N., Saez, E., Schanzenbach, D. W. & Yagan, D. (2011), ‘How Does Your Kindergarten Classroom Affect Your Earnings? Evidence from Project Star’, The Quarterly Journal of Economics 126(4) Chiburis, R. C. (2010), ‘Semiparametric Bounds on Treatment Effects’, Journal of Econometrics 159(2) DeMel, S., McKenzie, D. & Woodruff, C. (2013), ‘The Demand for, and Consequences of, Formalization among Informal First in Sri Lanka’, American Economic Journal: Applied Economics 5(2) Dobbie, W. & Jr., R. G. F. (2015), ‘The Medium-Term Impacts of High-Achieving Charter Schools’, Journal of Political Economy 123(5) Farber, H. S. (1993), ‘The Incidence and Costs of Job Loss: 1982-91’, Brookings Papers: Microeconomics Frangakis, C. & Rubin, D. (2002), ‘Principal Stratification in Causal Inference’, Biometrics 58(1) Fricke, H., Frolich, M., Huber, M. & Lechner, M. (2015), Endogeneity and NonResponse Bias in Treatment Evaluation: Nonparametric Identification of Causal Effects by Instruments. Frolich, M. & Huber, M. (2014), ‘Treatment Evaluation with Multiple Outcome Periods Under Endogeneity and Attrition’, Journal of the American Statistical Association 109(508) Heckman, J. J. (1979), ‘Sample Selection Bias as a Specification Error’, Econometrica 47(1) Heckman, J. J. & Borjas, G. J. (1980), ‘Does unemployment cause future unemployment? definitions, questions and answers from a continuous time model of heterogeneity and state dependence’, Economica 47(187) Heckman, J. J., Urzua, S. & Vytlacil, E. (2006), ‘Understanding Instrumental Variables in Models with Essential Heterogeneity’, The Review of Economics and Statistics 88(3) Heckman, J. J. & Vytlacil, E. (2001a), Instrumental Variables, Selection Models, and Tight Bounds on the Average Treatment Effect, in M. Lechner & J. Pfeifer, eds, ‘Econometric Evaluation of Labour Market Policies’, Vol. 13 of ZEW Economic Studies, Physica, Heidelberg. Heckman, J. J. & Vytlacil, E. (2005), ‘Structural Equations, Treatment Effects and Econometric Policy Evaluation’, Econometrica 73(3), pp. 669{738. Heckman, J., LaLonde, R. & Smith, J. (1999), The Economics and Econometrics of Active Labor Market Programs, in O. Ashenfelter & D. Card, eds, ‘Handbook of Labor Economics’, Vol. 3A, Elsevier Heckman, J. & Vytlacil, E. (1999), ‘Local Instrumental Variables and Latent Variable Models for Identifying and Bounding Treatment Effects’, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 96 Heckman, J. & Vytlacil, E. (2001b), ‘Policy-Relevant Treatment Effects’, American Economic Review: Papers and Proceedings 91(2) Helland, E. & Yoon, J. (2017), ‘Estimating the Effects of the English Rule on Litigation Outcomes’, The Review of Economics and Statistics 99(4) Huber, M. (2014), ‘Treatment Evaluation in the Presence of Sample Selection’, Econometric Reviews 33(8) Huber, M., Laffers, L. & Mellace, G. (2017), ‘Sharp IV Bounds on Average Treatment Effects on the Treated and Other Populations under Endogeneity and Noncompliance’, Journal of Applied Econometrics 32 Huber, M. & Mellace, G. (2015), ‘Sharp Bounds on Causal Effects under Sample Selection’, Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics 77(1) Imai, K. (2008), ‘Sharp Bounds on the Causal Effects in Randomized Experiments with Truncation- by- Death’, Statistics and Probability Letters 78(2) Imbens, G. W. & Angrist, J. D. (1994), ‘Identification and Estimation of Local Average Treatment Effects’, Econometrica 62(2) Jacobson, L. S., LaLonde, R. J. & Sullivan, D. G. (1993), ‘Earnings Losses of Displaced Workers’, The American Economic Review 83(4) Krueger, A. B. & Whitmore, D. M. (2001), ‘The Effect of Attending a Small Class in the Early Grades on College-Test Taking and Middle School Test Results: Evidence from Project STAR’, The Economic Journal 111(468) Lechner, M. & Mell, B. (2010), Partial Idendification of Wage Effects of Training Programs. Available at: https://ideas.repec.org/p/bro/econwp/2010-8.html. Lee, D. S. (2009), ‘Training, Wages, and Sample Selection: Estimating Sharp Bounds on Treatment Effects’, The Review of Economic Studies 76 Lee, S. & Salanie, B. (2016), Identifying Effects of Multivalued Treatments. Machado, C., Shaikh, A. M. & Vytlacil, E. (2018), Instrumental Variables and the Sign of the Average Treatment Effect. Forthcoming on the Journal of Econometrics. Manski, C. F. (1990), ‘Nonparametric Bounds on Treatment Effects’, American Economic Review 80(2) Manski, C. F. (1997), ‘Monotone Treatment response’, Econometrica 65(6) Manski, C. F. & Pepper, J. V. (2000), ‘Monotone Instrumental Variables: With an Application to the Returns to Schooling’, Econometrica 68(4) Mealli, F. & Pacini, B. (2013), ‘Using Secondary Outcomes to Sharpen Inference in Randomized Experiments with Noncompliance’, Journal of the American Statistical Association 108(503) Mogstad, M., Santos, A. & Torgovitsky, A. (2017), Using Instrumental Variables for Inference about Policy Relevant Treatment Effects. NBER Working Paper 23568. Newey, W. K., Powell, J. L. & Vella, F. (1999), ‘Nonparametric Estimation of Triangular Simultaneous Equations Models’, Econometrica 67(3) Rubin, D. (1974), ‘Estimating Causal Effects of Treatments in Randomized and Nonrandomized Studies’, Journal of Educational Psychology 66(5) Shaikh, A. & Vytlacil, E. (2011), ‘Partial Identification in Triangular Systems of Equations with Binary Dependent Variables’, Econometrica 79(3) Steinmayr, A. (2014), When a Random Sample is not Random: Bounds on the Effect of Migration on Children Left Behind. Working Paper. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (2004), The Health Consequences of Smoking: A Report of the Surgeon General, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, Office on Smoking and Health. Available at: https: //www.cdc.gov/tobacco/data_statistics/sgr/2004/index.htm. Vytlacil, E. (2002), ‘Independence, Monotonicity and Latent Index Models: An Equivalence Result’, Econometrica 70(1) |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/91828 |
Available Versions of this Item
-
Sharp bounds on the MTE with sample selection. (deposited 07 Nov 2018 02:24)
- Sharp bounds on the MTE with sample selection. (deposited 30 Jan 2019 15:05) [Currently Displayed]